[Comparison of the Documented Dementia Diagnoses in German Primary Care with the Prevalence Estimate for 2021].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatrische Praxis Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-09 DOI:10.1055/a-2160-2864
Jens Bohlken, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Karel Kostev, Bernhard Michalowsky
{"title":"[Comparison of the Documented Dementia Diagnoses in German Primary Care with the Prevalence Estimate for 2021].","authors":"Jens Bohlken, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Karel Kostev, Bernhard Michalowsky","doi":"10.1055/a-2160-2864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A current prevalence estimate predicted the number of people with dementia (PwD) with 1.8 million in 2021. This estimation is based on data from different sources especially from field studies and does not reflect the recognized and documented cases in primary care. We, therefore, aim to compare the prevalence of diagnosed PwD in general practitioner (GP) practices with these estimates of the general population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The number of diagnosed PwD in 946 GP practices with 2.8 million patients in 2021 was compared with the prevalence estimate of the German Alzheimer Society for 83 million inhabitants in Germany.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>  Dementia diagnoses were documented less frequently in GP practices compared to the prevalence estimate (1.88% vs 2.16%), especially the age groups 80+years were less likely present in GP practices prevalence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is still potential for optimizing dementia diagnostics in primary care, especially in patients 80 or older.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2160-2864","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A current prevalence estimate predicted the number of people with dementia (PwD) with 1.8 million in 2021. This estimation is based on data from different sources especially from field studies and does not reflect the recognized and documented cases in primary care. We, therefore, aim to compare the prevalence of diagnosed PwD in general practitioner (GP) practices with these estimates of the general population.

Methods: The number of diagnosed PwD in 946 GP practices with 2.8 million patients in 2021 was compared with the prevalence estimate of the German Alzheimer Society for 83 million inhabitants in Germany.

Results:   Dementia diagnoses were documented less frequently in GP practices compared to the prevalence estimate (1.88% vs 2.16%), especially the age groups 80+years were less likely present in GP practices prevalence.

Discussion: There is still potential for optimizing dementia diagnostics in primary care, especially in patients 80 or older.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[德国初级保健中记录的痴呆症诊断与2021年患病率估计的比较]。
背景:目前的患病率估计预测,2021年痴呆症患者人数为180万。这一估计是基于不同来源的数据,特别是来自实地研究的数据,并没有反映出初级保健中公认和记录的病例。因此,我们的目的是将全科医生(GP)实践中诊断出的PwD的患病率与这些对普通人群的估计进行比较。方法:将2021年946家全科医生诊所280万名患者中确诊的PwD人数与德国阿尔茨海默病协会8300万居民的患病率估计值进行比较。结果:  与患病率估计相比(1.88%对2.16%),全科医生实践中痴呆症诊断的频率较低,尤其是80岁以上的年龄组在全科医生执业中的患病率较低。讨论:在初级保健中优化痴呆症诊断仍然有潜力,尤其是在80岁或以上的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatrische Praxis
Psychiatrische Praxis PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Sozialpsychiatrisch orientiert Aktuelle Originalarbeiten und fundierte Übersichten Pro-Kontra-Debatten zu Brennpunktthemen Informative Fallbeispiele Vorstellung internationaler Studien
期刊最新文献
[Institutionalised Pre-School Childcare and Reported Maltreatment: A Survey in East Germany]. [What does an Ideal Day Centre Look Like? The User Perspective on Day-Structuring Programmes for People with Mental Illness]. [Compensation for National Socialist Persecution as a Catalyst for a Paradigm Shift - A Contribution to the History of Psychiatry in the Early Federal Republic of Germany]. [IEHT vs. Regular Treatment - Are there Differences between the Two forms of Treatment in the Retrospective Course with regard to Individual Objective and Subjective Outcome Variables?] [Occupational Stressors and Resources of Peer Workers in Social Psychiatry].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1