Quality evaluation of pregnancy-related mobile applications in South Korea: a descriptive study.

IF 1 Q3 NURSING Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-26 DOI:10.4069/kjwhn.2023.06.20
Hyunjin Cho, Feiyan Yi, Sukhee Ahn
{"title":"Quality evaluation of pregnancy-related mobile applications in South Korea: a descriptive study.","authors":"Hyunjin Cho, Feiyan Yi, Sukhee Ahn","doi":"10.4069/kjwhn.2023.06.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to describe the characteristics of mobile applications (apps) related to pregnancy in South Korea and evaluate their quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search for pregnancy-related apps available in Korea in two app stores as of April 29, 2022. The quality of apps was assessed using the Korean translation of the Mobile Application Rating Scale for objective quality with four subdomains (engagement, function, aesthetics, and information) and four items for subjective quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 163 apps were selected and reviewed. Both the objective and subjective quality of the apps were found to be desirable, with scores exceeding 3 out of 5 (range, 34-82). All subdomain scores in the objective quality assessment were also desirable. Among the four objective quality subdomains, aesthetics received the highest scores, followed by information, function, and engagement. In terms of subjective quality, the scores for a comprehensive overall evaluation, continuous use, and recommendation exceeded 3 out of 5, with the exception of payment. Only a small number of apps (n=4, 2.9%) were backed by a reliable authority, such as an expert review. Significant differences were observed in the objective quality of apps across different content categories (F=3.86, p=.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most pregnancy-related apps had desirable levels of objective and subjective quality. However, app content experts seldom provide reviews. It is crucial for nurses to recommend apps to expectant mothers that offer dependable content, regularly updated with the latest information.</p>","PeriodicalId":30467,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2023.06.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to describe the characteristics of mobile applications (apps) related to pregnancy in South Korea and evaluate their quality.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search for pregnancy-related apps available in Korea in two app stores as of April 29, 2022. The quality of apps was assessed using the Korean translation of the Mobile Application Rating Scale for objective quality with four subdomains (engagement, function, aesthetics, and information) and four items for subjective quality.

Results: In total, 163 apps were selected and reviewed. Both the objective and subjective quality of the apps were found to be desirable, with scores exceeding 3 out of 5 (range, 34-82). All subdomain scores in the objective quality assessment were also desirable. Among the four objective quality subdomains, aesthetics received the highest scores, followed by information, function, and engagement. In terms of subjective quality, the scores for a comprehensive overall evaluation, continuous use, and recommendation exceeded 3 out of 5, with the exception of payment. Only a small number of apps (n=4, 2.9%) were backed by a reliable authority, such as an expert review. Significant differences were observed in the objective quality of apps across different content categories (F=3.86, p=.003).

Conclusion: Most pregnancy-related apps had desirable levels of objective and subjective quality. However, app content experts seldom provide reviews. It is crucial for nurses to recommend apps to expectant mothers that offer dependable content, regularly updated with the latest information.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国妊娠相关移动应用程序的质量评估:一项描述性研究。
目的:本研究旨在描述韩国与怀孕相关的移动应用程序的特征,并评估其质量。方法:我们对截至2022年4月29日在韩国两家应用商店提供的与怀孕相关的应用程序进行了系统搜索。应用程序的质量是使用移动应用程序评定量表的韩语翻译进行评估的,该量表包含四个子域(参与度、功能、美学和信息)和四个主观质量项目。结果:总共有163个应用程序被选中并进行了审查。应用程序的客观和主观质量都是令人满意的,得分超过了5分之3(范围34-82)。客观质量评估中的所有子域得分也是可取的。在四个客观质量子域中,美学得分最高,其次是信息、功能和参与度。在主观质量方面,除付费外,综合综合评价、持续使用和推荐的得分超过了5分中的3分。只有少数应用程序(n=4.29%)得到了可靠权威机构的支持,如专家评审。不同内容类别的应用程序的客观质量存在显著差异(F=3.86,p=0.003)。结论:大多数妊娠相关应用程序的主观和客观质量都达到了理想水平。然而,应用程序内容专家很少提供评论。护士向准妈妈推荐提供可靠内容并定期更新最新信息的应用程序至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing
Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
28
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of suicide statistics and trends between 2011 and 2021 among Korean women An explanatory model of quality of life in high-risk pregnant women in Korea: a structural equation model Authenticity and rizz – What do they have to do with journal editors and researchers? How do mothers with young children perceive endocrine-disrupting chemicals?: an exploratory qualitative study Factors influencing health-related quality of life in older adult women with sarcopenia: analysis of the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1