Straw vs Cup Use in Patients with Symptoms of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.

Spartan medical research journal Pub Date : 2020-01-30
Bo Pang, Paul Cox, Julianna Codino, Austin Collum, Jake Sims, Adam Rubin
{"title":"Straw vs Cup Use in Patients with Symptoms of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.","authors":"Bo Pang, Paul Cox, Julianna Codino, Austin Collum, Jake Sims, Adam Rubin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>This study aims to determine whether straw or cup use is superior for the control of a single thin liquid bolus in patients with symptoms of oropharyngeal dysphagia to liquids.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study. Patients were studied at a Professional Voice and Swallowing Center by a laryngologist between April 2017 and April 2018. Twenty-five patients, 18 years of age or older, who presented with symptoms of oropharyngeal dysphagia the clinic were included in the study. Each patient complained of difficulty with choking on liquids. Informed consent was obtained from each patient. Patients that were unable to follow one to two step commands and patients with dysphagia that lack oral strength or respiratory strength to facilitate straw or cup usage were not included. Patients with dysphagia that are tracheostomy tube dependent were also not included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average PAS for straw versus cup drinking at 10mL was 1.08 and 1.04 respectively with a p-value of 0.33. For straw versus cup at 20mL, the PAS was 1.04 and 1.26 respectively with a p-value of 0.13. For 30mL, the PAS was 1.0 and 1.4 for straw and cup use respectively with a p-value of 0.16. And for 40mL, the PAS was 1.0 and 1.09 with a p-value of 0.27.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No statistical significant difference was demonstrated in risk of penetration or aspiration of thin liquids between cup and straw usage in patients with mild oropharyngeal dysphagia.</p>","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":"4 2","pages":"11591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spartan medical research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: This study aims to determine whether straw or cup use is superior for the control of a single thin liquid bolus in patients with symptoms of oropharyngeal dysphagia to liquids.

Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study. Patients were studied at a Professional Voice and Swallowing Center by a laryngologist between April 2017 and April 2018. Twenty-five patients, 18 years of age or older, who presented with symptoms of oropharyngeal dysphagia the clinic were included in the study. Each patient complained of difficulty with choking on liquids. Informed consent was obtained from each patient. Patients that were unable to follow one to two step commands and patients with dysphagia that lack oral strength or respiratory strength to facilitate straw or cup usage were not included. Patients with dysphagia that are tracheostomy tube dependent were also not included.

Results: The average PAS for straw versus cup drinking at 10mL was 1.08 and 1.04 respectively with a p-value of 0.33. For straw versus cup at 20mL, the PAS was 1.04 and 1.26 respectively with a p-value of 0.13. For 30mL, the PAS was 1.0 and 1.4 for straw and cup use respectively with a p-value of 0.16. And for 40mL, the PAS was 1.0 and 1.09 with a p-value of 0.27.

Conclusions: No statistical significant difference was demonstrated in risk of penetration or aspiration of thin liquids between cup and straw usage in patients with mild oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有口咽吞咽困难症状的患者使用吸管与杯子。
背景:本研究旨在确定在有口咽液体吞咽困难症状的患者中,吸管或杯子的使用是否优于单次薄液体推注的控制。方法:这是一项前瞻性、随机、单盲研究。2017年4月至2018年4月,一名喉科医生在专业声音和吞咽中心对患者进行了研究。25名患者,18岁或以上,在临床上出现口咽吞咽困难症状,被纳入研究。每个病人都抱怨液体窒息困难。获得每位患者的知情同意书。无法遵循一到两步命令的患者以及缺乏口腔力量或呼吸力量以促进吸管或杯子使用的吞咽困难患者不包括在内。依赖气管造口管的吞咽困难患者也不包括在内。结果:10mL吸管和杯子的平均PAS分别为1.08和1.04,p值为0.33。对于20mL的吸管和杯子,PAS分别为1.04和1.26,p值为0.13。对于30mL,吸管和杯子使用的PAS分别为1.0和1.4,p值为0.16。40mL时,PAS分别为1.0和1.09,p值为0.27。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Porosities of 3D Printed Titanium Implants on the Tensile Properties: Correspondence. Clinical predictors of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections: A healthcare system analysis. Bridging Innovation and Clinical Insights: Reflections on Healthcare Research and Emergency Medicine. Corticosteroid Prescribing Patterns in the Emergency Department for Acute COPD Exacerbations: A Retrospective Analysis Following an Educational Intervention. A Resident-Led Quality Improvement Project in a Community Based Hospital Emergency Department - The Benefits of Simplified Plan-Do-Study-Act/Patient-Safety Quality Improvement Projects Regardless of Staffing Levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1