"Fall Risk Scoring" in Outpatient Gait Analysis: Validation of a New Fall Risk Assessment for Nursing Home Residents.

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-09 DOI:10.1055/a-2151-4709
Eduard Witiko Unger, Tim Pohlemann, Marcel Orth, Mika F R Rollmann, Maximilian M Menger, Steven C Herath, Tina Histing, Benedikt J Braun
{"title":"\"Fall Risk Scoring\" in Outpatient Gait Analysis: Validation of a New Fall Risk Assessment for Nursing Home Residents.","authors":"Eduard Witiko Unger, Tim Pohlemann, Marcel Orth, Mika F R Rollmann, Maximilian M Menger, Steven C Herath, Tina Histing, Benedikt J Braun","doi":"10.1055/a-2151-4709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Falls in senior home residents are common. Individual preventive training can lower the fall risk. To detect the need for training, a systematic assessment of the individual fall risk is needed. The aim of this study was thus to assess whether a fall risk score based on free field insole measurements can distinguish between an at-risk group of senior home residents and a healthy young control group. A published fall risk score was used in senior home residents over the age of 75 and a young (< 40 years) control group to determine the individual fall risk. In addition, the fall events over 12 months were assessed. Statistical analysis including ROC analysis was performed to determine the ability of the score to detect participants at heightened fall risk. In total, 18 nursing home residents and 9 young control participants were included. Of the nursing home residents, 15 had at least one fall, with a total of 37 falls recorded over 12 months. In the control group, no falls were recorded. The fall risk score was significantly different between nursing home residents and the control group (9.2 + 3.2 vs. 5.7 ± 2.2). Furthermore, the score significantly differentiated fallers from non-fallers (10.3 ± 1.8 vs. 5.2 ± 2.5), with a cut-off > 7.5 (AUC: 0.95) and a sensitivity of 86.7% (specificity 83.3%). The fall risk score is able to detect the difference between senior nursing home residents and young, healthy controls, as well as between fallers and non-fallers. Its main proof of concept is demonstrated, as based on movement data outside special gait labs, and it can simplify the risk of fall determination in geriatric nursing home residents and can now be used in further, prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94274,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2151-4709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Falls in senior home residents are common. Individual preventive training can lower the fall risk. To detect the need for training, a systematic assessment of the individual fall risk is needed. The aim of this study was thus to assess whether a fall risk score based on free field insole measurements can distinguish between an at-risk group of senior home residents and a healthy young control group. A published fall risk score was used in senior home residents over the age of 75 and a young (< 40 years) control group to determine the individual fall risk. In addition, the fall events over 12 months were assessed. Statistical analysis including ROC analysis was performed to determine the ability of the score to detect participants at heightened fall risk. In total, 18 nursing home residents and 9 young control participants were included. Of the nursing home residents, 15 had at least one fall, with a total of 37 falls recorded over 12 months. In the control group, no falls were recorded. The fall risk score was significantly different between nursing home residents and the control group (9.2 + 3.2 vs. 5.7 ± 2.2). Furthermore, the score significantly differentiated fallers from non-fallers (10.3 ± 1.8 vs. 5.2 ± 2.5), with a cut-off > 7.5 (AUC: 0.95) and a sensitivity of 86.7% (specificity 83.3%). The fall risk score is able to detect the difference between senior nursing home residents and young, healthy controls, as well as between fallers and non-fallers. Its main proof of concept is demonstrated, as based on movement data outside special gait labs, and it can simplify the risk of fall determination in geriatric nursing home residents and can now be used in further, prospective studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊步态分析中的“跌倒风险评分”:疗养院居民跌倒风险评估的新验证。
老年家庭住户摔倒的情况很常见。个人预防性训练可以降低跌倒风险。为了发现训练的必要性,需要对个人跌倒风险进行系统评估。因此,本研究的目的是评估基于自由场地鞋垫测量的跌倒风险评分是否可以区分老年家庭居民的风险组和健康的年轻对照组。已公布的跌倒风险评分用于75岁以上的养老院居民和一名年轻人(7.5(AUC:0.95),敏感性为86.7%(特异性83.3%)。跌倒风险评分能够检测养老院老年居民和年轻健康对照之间以及跌倒者和非跌倒者之间的差异。它的主要概念验证是基于特殊步态实验室外的运动数据进行的,它可以简化老年疗养院居民跌倒风险的确定,现在可以用于进一步的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coiling of a Postinterventional Pseudoaneurysm After Distal Locking of a Proximal Femoral Nail. [Transtuberositary, Anterior Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy (TT-AOW-HTO) to Correct a Negative Slope]. GeriNOT in the Surgical Inpatient Setting. Development and Evaluation of the OF Pelvis Score for Osteoporotic Pelvic Ring Fractures - A Retrospective Assessment of Therapy Recommendations for 107 Patients. Comparison of Pre- and Postoperative Motor-proprioceptive Abilities in Patients with Gonarthrosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1