SMT-based verification of program changes through summary repair.

IF 0.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS Formal Methods in System Design Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1007/s10703-023-00423-0
Sepideh Asadi, Martin Blicha, Antti E J Hyvärinen, Grigory Fedyukovich, Natasha Sharygina
{"title":"SMT-based verification of program changes through summary repair.","authors":"Sepideh Asadi,&nbsp;Martin Blicha,&nbsp;Antti E J Hyvärinen,&nbsp;Grigory Fedyukovich,&nbsp;Natasha Sharygina","doi":"10.1007/s10703-023-00423-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article provides an innovative approach for verification by model checking of programs that undergo continuous changes. To tackle the problem of repeating the entire model checking for each new version of the program, our approach verifies programs incrementally. It reuses computational history of the previous program version, namely function summaries. In particular, the summaries are over-approximations of the bounded program behaviors. Whenever reusing of summaries is not possible straight away, our algorithm repairs the summaries to maximize the chance of reusability of them for subsequent runs. We base our approach on satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) to take full advantage of lightweight modeling approach and at the same time the ability to provide concise function summarization. Our approach leverages pre-computed function summaries in SMT to localize the checks of changed functions. Furthermore, to exploit the trade-off between precision and performance, our approach relies on the use of an SMT solver, not only for underlying reasoning, but also for program modeling and the adjustment of its precision. On the benchmark suite of primarily Linux device drivers versions, we demonstrate that our algorithm achieves an order of magnitude speedup compared to prior approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":12430,"journal":{"name":"Formal Methods in System Design","volume":"60 3","pages":"350-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10564826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formal Methods in System Design","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10703-023-00423-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides an innovative approach for verification by model checking of programs that undergo continuous changes. To tackle the problem of repeating the entire model checking for each new version of the program, our approach verifies programs incrementally. It reuses computational history of the previous program version, namely function summaries. In particular, the summaries are over-approximations of the bounded program behaviors. Whenever reusing of summaries is not possible straight away, our algorithm repairs the summaries to maximize the chance of reusability of them for subsequent runs. We base our approach on satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) to take full advantage of lightweight modeling approach and at the same time the ability to provide concise function summarization. Our approach leverages pre-computed function summaries in SMT to localize the checks of changed functions. Furthermore, to exploit the trade-off between precision and performance, our approach relies on the use of an SMT solver, not only for underlying reasoning, but also for program modeling and the adjustment of its precision. On the benchmark suite of primarily Linux device drivers versions, we demonstrate that our algorithm achieves an order of magnitude speedup compared to prior approaches.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过汇总修复对程序更改进行基于SMT的验证。
本文通过对不断变化的程序进行模型检查,提供了一种创新的验证方法。为了解决为每个新版本的程序重复整个模型检查的问题,我们的方法递增地验证程序。它重用了以前程序版本的计算历史,即函数摘要。特别地,这些摘要是有界程序行为的过度近似。每当不能立即重用摘要时,我们的算法就会修复摘要,以最大限度地提高它们在后续运行中的可重用性。我们的方法基于可满足性模理论(SMT),以充分利用轻量级建模方法,同时提供简洁的函数摘要。我们的方法利用SMT中预先计算的函数摘要来本地化更改函数的检查。此外,为了利用精度和性能之间的权衡,我们的方法依赖于SMT求解器的使用,不仅用于底层推理,还用于程序建模和精度调整。在主要由Linux设备驱动程序版本组成的基准套件上,我们证明了与以前的方法相比,我们的算法实现了一个数量级的加速。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Formal Methods in System Design
Formal Methods in System Design 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The focus of this journal is on formal methods for designing, implementing, and validating the correctness of hardware (VLSI) and software systems. The stimulus for starting a journal with this goal came from both academia and industry. In both areas, interest in the use of formal methods has increased rapidly during the past few years. The enormous cost and time required to validate new designs has led to the realization that more powerful techniques must be developed. A number of techniques and tools are currently being devised for improving the reliability, and robustness of complex hardware and software systems. While the boundary between the (sub)components of a system that are cast in hardware, firmware, or software continues to blur, the relevant design disciplines and formal methods are maturing rapidly. Consequently, an important (and useful) collection of commonly applicable formal methods are expected to emerge that will strongly influence future design environments and design methods.
期刊最新文献
Abstraction Modulo Stability PAC statistical model checking of mean payoff in discrete- and continuous-time MDP A verified durable transactional mutex lock for persistent x86-TSO Formally understanding Rust’s ownership and borrowing system at the memory level The hexatope and octatope abstract domains for neural network verification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1