Favorable impact of a novel endoscopic auxiliary system (NEAS) on fluoroscopy-guided lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones: A pilot study

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Digestive Diseases Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1111/1751-2980.13234
Yu Qing Mao, Jian Bo Ni, Yi Neng Yu, Kui Peng, Ying Qu, You Chen Xia, Sheng Zheng Luo, Seng Wang Fu, Ni Xie, Lun Gen Lu, Xin Jian Wan, Bai Wen Li
{"title":"Favorable impact of a novel endoscopic auxiliary system (NEAS) on fluoroscopy-guided lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones: A pilot study","authors":"Yu Qing Mao,&nbsp;Jian Bo Ni,&nbsp;Yi Neng Yu,&nbsp;Kui Peng,&nbsp;Ying Qu,&nbsp;You Chen Xia,&nbsp;Sheng Zheng Luo,&nbsp;Seng Wang Fu,&nbsp;Ni Xie,&nbsp;Lun Gen Lu,&nbsp;Xin Jian Wan,&nbsp;Bai Wen Li","doi":"10.1111/1751-2980.13234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Laser lithotripsy under fluoroscopic guidance is difficult to perform and risky due to its invisibility. In this study we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of a novel endoscopic auxiliary system (NEAS)-assisted lithotripsy under fluoroscopy for treating difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with difficult CBD stones who were treated with NEAS-assisted laser lithotripsy (NEAS group) or conventional mechanical lithotripsy (ML) under fluoroscopy (ML group) were retrospectively evaluated. The primary outcome was the complete stone clearance rate and the secondary outcomes included operation time, complications, and medical cost.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventeen patients were treated with NEAS-assisted laser lithotripsy and 144 patients underwent ML. Using the propensity score matching analysis, 17 pairs of cases treated with NEAS-assisted lithotripsy and ML were included. Patients in the NEAS group showed a higher stone clearance rate than the ML group (94.1% vs 58.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.039), as well as shorter operation time (41.9 min vs 49.4 min, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and lower medical cost (USD 4607 vs USD 5014, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the two groups (5.9% vs 17.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.601).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>NEAS-assisted fluoroscopy-guided laser lithotripsy is feasible and safe, which may be a promising technique in fluoroscopy-guided laser lithotripsy for difficult CBD stones.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15564,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digestive Diseases","volume":"24 11","pages":"630-637"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1751-2980.13234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Laser lithotripsy under fluoroscopic guidance is difficult to perform and risky due to its invisibility. In this study we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of a novel endoscopic auxiliary system (NEAS)-assisted lithotripsy under fluoroscopy for treating difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones.

Methods

Patients with difficult CBD stones who were treated with NEAS-assisted laser lithotripsy (NEAS group) or conventional mechanical lithotripsy (ML) under fluoroscopy (ML group) were retrospectively evaluated. The primary outcome was the complete stone clearance rate and the secondary outcomes included operation time, complications, and medical cost.

Results

Seventeen patients were treated with NEAS-assisted laser lithotripsy and 144 patients underwent ML. Using the propensity score matching analysis, 17 pairs of cases treated with NEAS-assisted lithotripsy and ML were included. Patients in the NEAS group showed a higher stone clearance rate than the ML group (94.1% vs 58.8%, P = 0.039), as well as shorter operation time (41.9 min vs 49.4 min, P < 0.001) and lower medical cost (USD 4607 vs USD 5014, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the two groups (5.9% vs 17.6%, P = 0.601).

Conclusion

NEAS-assisted fluoroscopy-guided laser lithotripsy is feasible and safe, which may be a promising technique in fluoroscopy-guided laser lithotripsy for difficult CBD stones.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型内窥镜辅助系统(NEAS)对荧光镜引导下胆管结石碎石术的有利影响:一项初步研究。
目的:由于荧光镜下激光纤维的不可见性,在荧光镜引导下进行激光碎石术既困难又危险。本研究旨在探讨一种新型内窥镜辅助系统(NEAS)辅助碎石在荧光镜下治疗难治性胆总管(CBD)结石的可行性。方法:对接受NEAS辅助激光碎石术(NEAS组)或荧光镜下常规机械碎石术(ML组)治疗的难治性CBD结石患者进行回顾性评价。主要结果是结石完全清除率,次要结果包括手术时间、并发症和费用。结果:17例患者接受了NEAS辅助激光碎石术治疗,144例患者接受ML.采用倾向评分匹配设计,我们选择了17对接受NEAS辅助碎石术和ML.NEAS组患者的结石清除率高于ML组(94.1%vs.58.8%,p = 0.039),以及更短的手术时间(41.9分钟vs.49.4分钟,P结论:我们的研究表明,NEAS辅助荧光镜引导的激光碎石术是可行和安全的,这可能是一种很有前途的荧光镜引导下的激光碎石术治疗难治CBD结石的技术。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Digestive Diseases
Journal of Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Digestive Diseases is the official English-language journal of the Chinese Society of Gastroenterology. The journal is published twelve times per year and includes peer-reviewed original papers, review articles and commentaries concerned with research relating to the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, liver, biliary tract and pancreas.
期刊最新文献
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Affect Post-Progression Survival of Specific Patient Subgroups With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Study Cohorts' Analysis. Ethnic Minority Disparities in the Epidemiology of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in a Representative Area of China. Association of Poor Sleep Quality With Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Climate Sustainability as a Catalyst for Quality and Excellence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Narrative Review. Sarcopenia as a Risk Factor for Mortality in NAFLD: How Should We Diagnose It?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1