IMPROVING DIVERSE PARTICIPATION IN CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS.

Ruben Mesa, Rebecca T Jones
{"title":"IMPROVING DIVERSE PARTICIPATION IN CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS.","authors":"Ruben Mesa,&nbsp;Rebecca T Jones","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite significant improvement in overall cancer mortality (>30% since 1991), these survival benefits have not been experienced by all groups uniformly especially in those of diverse heritage. Drivers of cancer health inequity are multi-factorial including more adverse social determinants of health, later stage cancer presentation, decreased health care access, decreased health literacy, and cultural barriers to prompt cancer care. Adding to these disparities is the historical inclusion of primarily well-insured Caucasian patients into cancer clinical trials leading to deep gaps in understanding both the efficacy and safety of new therapies in the actual populations for which these medications will be used. The need for trial accruals to reflect the U.S. population (i.e., diverse) is essential across diseases, but especially those in which certain minority populations are overrepresented (Latinos and hepatocellular carcinoma, African Americans and myeloma and prostate cancer). Strategies and new legislation to increase diversity in trial accruals are outlined and discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23186,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10493734/pdf/tacca1330000149.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite significant improvement in overall cancer mortality (>30% since 1991), these survival benefits have not been experienced by all groups uniformly especially in those of diverse heritage. Drivers of cancer health inequity are multi-factorial including more adverse social determinants of health, later stage cancer presentation, decreased health care access, decreased health literacy, and cultural barriers to prompt cancer care. Adding to these disparities is the historical inclusion of primarily well-insured Caucasian patients into cancer clinical trials leading to deep gaps in understanding both the efficacy and safety of new therapies in the actual populations for which these medications will be used. The need for trial accruals to reflect the U.S. population (i.e., diverse) is essential across diseases, but especially those in which certain minority populations are overrepresented (Latinos and hepatocellular carcinoma, African Americans and myeloma and prostate cancer). Strategies and new legislation to increase diversity in trial accruals are outlined and discussed.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高癌症临床试验的多样性。
尽管癌症总死亡率显著提高(自1991年以来超过30%),但并非所有群体都能统一体验到这些生存益处,尤其是那些具有不同遗传背景的群体。癌症健康不平等的驱动因素是多因素的,包括健康的更不利的社会决定因素、癌症后期的表现、获得医疗保健的机会减少、健康知识下降以及促使癌症治疗的文化障碍。历史上将主要保险良好的高加索患者纳入癌症临床试验,这加剧了这些差异,导致在实际使用这些药物的人群中,对新疗法的疗效和安全性的理解存在严重差距。对反映美国人口(即多样化)的试验积累的需求在各种疾病中至关重要,但尤其是某些少数群体人口比例过高的疾病(拉丁裔和肝细胞癌、非裔美国人、骨髓瘤和癌症前列腺癌)。概述并讨论了增加审判应计项目多样性的战略和新立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
CLINICAL REASONING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: CAN AI REALLY THINK? Former Officers 1884 Through 2023. GENETIC DETERMINANTS OF THROMBOSIS. OFFICERS AND COUNCIL FALL 2024. PHENOTYPING REPAIR AFTER ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY: PRECISION MEDICINE TO CLINICAL TRIALS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1