Andrea Olsen, Alexandra Lebedeva, Polina Nosova, Vladislav Nikulin, Margarita Sharova, Ekaterina Ignatova, Vladislav Mileyko, Maxim Ivanov
{"title":"Impact of the STK11/KRAS co-mutation on the response to immunotherapy in a real-world pan-cancer cohort.","authors":"Andrea Olsen, Alexandra Lebedeva, Polina Nosova, Vladislav Nikulin, Margarita Sharova, Ekaterina Ignatova, Vladislav Mileyko, Maxim Ivanov","doi":"10.1177/03008916231204441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors are highly effective in treating various cancers. We analyzed the significance of the <i>KRAS/STK11</i> co-mutation in relation to the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in pan-cancer patient cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from open-access research: MSK-IMPACT (molecular profiling data from patients receiving systemic antitumor therapy) and MSK-TMB (molecular profiling data from patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors). In both studies, high throughput sequencing was used for molecular profiling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10,336 patients receiving antitumor therapy (MSK-IMPACT study) and 1661 patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (MSK-TMB study) were included in the analysis. Co-mutation <i>STK11/KRAS</i> was found in 156 (1.5%) and 46 (2.8%) patients in the two studies, respectively. Most patients with the <i>STK11/KRAS</i> co-mutation had non-small cell lung cancer (83% and 85% in the two studies, respectively). Among non-small cell lung cancer patients, the <i>STK11</i> mutation was associated with a worse outcome for patients receiving systemic antitumor therapy, but not immune checkpoint inhibition therapy (HR for OS 1.90 [95% CI 1.36-2.65] and 1.44 [95% CI 0.88-2.37]). Co-mutation <i>STK11/KRAS</i> was also not associated with patient outcome in any of the studies (HR for OS 0.93 [95% CI 0.56-1.52] and 1.09 [95% CI 0.54-2.19]). High tumor mutational burden was associated with better outcome in the cohort of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. An analogous analysis among patients in the pan-cancer cohort (excluding patients with non-small cell lung cancer) showed <i>STK11</i> mutations and high tumor mutational burden have a predictive role for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, but not <i>STK11/KRAS</i> co-mutation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Co-mutation <i>STK11/KRAS</i> is common among patients with non-small cell lung cancer and is not an independent predictive marker for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Further studies are required to clarify the role of <i>STK11</i> mutations in immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment response.</p>","PeriodicalId":23349,"journal":{"name":"Tumori","volume":" ","pages":"146-152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumori","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916231204441","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are highly effective in treating various cancers. We analyzed the significance of the KRAS/STK11 co-mutation in relation to the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in pan-cancer patient cohort.
Methods: We analyzed data from open-access research: MSK-IMPACT (molecular profiling data from patients receiving systemic antitumor therapy) and MSK-TMB (molecular profiling data from patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors). In both studies, high throughput sequencing was used for molecular profiling.
Results: A total of 10,336 patients receiving antitumor therapy (MSK-IMPACT study) and 1661 patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (MSK-TMB study) were included in the analysis. Co-mutation STK11/KRAS was found in 156 (1.5%) and 46 (2.8%) patients in the two studies, respectively. Most patients with the STK11/KRAS co-mutation had non-small cell lung cancer (83% and 85% in the two studies, respectively). Among non-small cell lung cancer patients, the STK11 mutation was associated with a worse outcome for patients receiving systemic antitumor therapy, but not immune checkpoint inhibition therapy (HR for OS 1.90 [95% CI 1.36-2.65] and 1.44 [95% CI 0.88-2.37]). Co-mutation STK11/KRAS was also not associated with patient outcome in any of the studies (HR for OS 0.93 [95% CI 0.56-1.52] and 1.09 [95% CI 0.54-2.19]). High tumor mutational burden was associated with better outcome in the cohort of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. An analogous analysis among patients in the pan-cancer cohort (excluding patients with non-small cell lung cancer) showed STK11 mutations and high tumor mutational burden have a predictive role for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, but not STK11/KRAS co-mutation.
Conclusions: Co-mutation STK11/KRAS is common among patients with non-small cell lung cancer and is not an independent predictive marker for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Further studies are required to clarify the role of STK11 mutations in immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment response.
期刊介绍:
Tumori Journal covers all aspects of cancer science and clinical practice with a strong focus on prevention, translational medicine and clinically relevant reports. We invite the publication of randomized trials and reports on large, consecutive patient series that investigate the real impact of new techniques, drugs and devices inday-to-day clinical practice.