Mission possible: open innovation in nursing and patient care services at Massachusetts General Hospital.

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Leader Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1136/leader-2023-000777
Hiyam M Nadel, Nour Al-Sultan, Alex Berger, Paula McCree, Gaurdia Banister, Olivia Jung
{"title":"Mission possible: open innovation in nursing and patient care services at Massachusetts General Hospital.","authors":"Hiyam M Nadel, Nour Al-Sultan, Alex Berger, Paula McCree, Gaurdia Banister, Olivia Jung","doi":"10.1136/leader-2023-000777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although front-line nurses and staff are uniquely positioned to identify the inefficiencies and gaps in care delivery, formal processes are not always in place to hear from those very employees.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We established a scalable process that embodies open innovation principles, to broaden and distribute the innovation locus.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.</p><p><strong>Particpitants: </strong>We invited 8800+ nurses and other direct caregivers to participate in organisational problem solving.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>We solicited employees to (1) identify pain points and develop solutions and (2) crowd vote to indicate which ideas they want to see implemented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>177 employees submitted 225 ideas, and 928 cast a vote. The 40 participants who submitted top-voted ideas were invited to develop a detailed implementation plan; of those, 27 submitted one. Four ideas emerged as winners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Formulating a clear call for ideas, securing leadership buy-in and generating excitement about the process were essential to our efforts. Challenges associated with opening the innovation process involved managing a large volume of participants and submissions, and providing on-the-go training to nurses and staff who were not used to being asked to participate in organisational problem solving.</p>","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":" ","pages":"162-166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2023-000777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Although front-line nurses and staff are uniquely positioned to identify the inefficiencies and gaps in care delivery, formal processes are not always in place to hear from those very employees.

Design: We established a scalable process that embodies open innovation principles, to broaden and distribute the innovation locus.

Setting: Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Particpitants: We invited 8800+ nurses and other direct caregivers to participate in organisational problem solving.

Interventions: We solicited employees to (1) identify pain points and develop solutions and (2) crowd vote to indicate which ideas they want to see implemented.

Results: 177 employees submitted 225 ideas, and 928 cast a vote. The 40 participants who submitted top-voted ideas were invited to develop a detailed implementation plan; of those, 27 submitted one. Four ideas emerged as winners.

Conclusions: Formulating a clear call for ideas, securing leadership buy-in and generating excitement about the process were essential to our efforts. Challenges associated with opening the innovation process involved managing a large volume of participants and submissions, and providing on-the-go training to nurses and staff who were not used to being asked to participate in organisational problem solving.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使命可能:马萨诸塞州总医院护理和患者护理服务的开放式创新。
目标:尽管一线护士和工作人员在识别护理提供中的低效和差距方面处于独特的地位,但并非总是有正式的流程来听取这些员工的意见。设计:我们建立了一个体现开放创新原则的可扩展流程,以拓宽和分布创新轨迹。地点:马萨诸塞州波士顿马萨诸塞州总医院。参与者:我们邀请了8800多名护士 以及其他直接照顾者参与组织问题解决。干预措施:我们邀请员工(1)确定痛点并制定解决方案,(2)进行集体投票,以表明他们希望看到哪些想法得到实施。结果:177名员工提交了225个想法,928人投票。40名提交了最高投票意见的参与者被邀请制定详细的实施计划;其中,27人提交了一份。四个想法脱颖而出。结论:制定明确的想法呼吁,确保领导层的支持,并对这一过程产生兴奋,对我们的努力至关重要。与开放创新流程相关的挑战包括管理大量参与者和提交材料,以及为不习惯被要求参与组织问题解决的护士和工作人员提供即时培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Leader
BMJ Leader Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Religious identity-based discrimination in the physician workforce: findings from a survey of Muslim physicians in the UK. Ten years on: The Snowy White Peaks of the NHS. Gender disparity in Canadian Institutes of Health Research funding within neurology. Impact of department chair gender on paid parental leave across American anaesthesiology residencies. 'Can you have it all?' Exploring perceived gender roles in leadership through the lens of the Chief Pharmaceutical Officer's clinical fellows 2023/24.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1