Which factors influence the approach to shared decision-making among surgeons performing complex operations?

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Communication in Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1080/17538068.2023.2267827
Elizabeth Palmer Kelly, Laura J Rush, Halia L Melnyk, Jennifer L Eramo, Ann Scheck McAlearney, Timothy M Pawlik
{"title":"Which factors influence the approach to shared decision-making among surgeons performing complex operations?","authors":"Elizabeth Palmer Kelly, Laura J Rush, Halia L Melnyk, Jennifer L Eramo, Ann Scheck McAlearney, Timothy M Pawlik","doi":"10.1080/17538068.2023.2267827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shared decision-making (SDM) aims to create a context in which patients and surgeons work together to explore treatment options and goals of care. The objective of the current study was to characterize demographic factors, behaviors, and perceptions of patient involvement among surgeons relative to SDM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a cross-sectional survey methodology, surgeon demographics, behaviors, and perceptions of patient involvement were assessed. Surgeon approaches to SDM were measured using a 100-point scale ranging from 'patient-led' (0) to 'surgeon-led' (100).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 241 respondents, most were male (<i>n</i> = 123, 67.2%) and White (<i>n</i> = 124, 69.3%); roughly one-half of surgeons had been in practice ≥10 years (<i>n</i> = 120, 52.4%). Surgeon approaches to SDM ranged from 0 to 81.0, with a median rating of 50.0 (IQR: 35.5, 62.0). Reported approaches to SDM were associated with years in practice, sharing information, and perceptions of patient involvement. Surgeons in practice 10 + years most frequently utilized a 'Shared, Patient-led' approach to SDM (27.5%), while individuals with less experience more often employed a 'Shared, Surgeon-led' approach (33.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.031). Surgeons with a 'Patient-led' approach perceived patient involvement as most important (M = 3.82, SD = 0.16), while respondents who had a 'Surgeon-led' approach considered this less important (M = 3.57, SD = 0.38; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgeon factors including demographics, behaviors, and perceptions of patient involvement influenced SDM approaches. SDM between patients and surgeons should strive to be more dynamic and tailored to each specific patient's needs to promote optimal patient-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":38052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"77-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2023.2267827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) aims to create a context in which patients and surgeons work together to explore treatment options and goals of care. The objective of the current study was to characterize demographic factors, behaviors, and perceptions of patient involvement among surgeons relative to SDM.

Methods: Using a cross-sectional survey methodology, surgeon demographics, behaviors, and perceptions of patient involvement were assessed. Surgeon approaches to SDM were measured using a 100-point scale ranging from 'patient-led' (0) to 'surgeon-led' (100).

Results: Among 241 respondents, most were male (n = 123, 67.2%) and White (n = 124, 69.3%); roughly one-half of surgeons had been in practice ≥10 years (n = 120, 52.4%). Surgeon approaches to SDM ranged from 0 to 81.0, with a median rating of 50.0 (IQR: 35.5, 62.0). Reported approaches to SDM were associated with years in practice, sharing information, and perceptions of patient involvement. Surgeons in practice 10 + years most frequently utilized a 'Shared, Patient-led' approach to SDM (27.5%), while individuals with less experience more often employed a 'Shared, Surgeon-led' approach (33.3%, p = 0.031). Surgeons with a 'Patient-led' approach perceived patient involvement as most important (M = 3.82, SD = 0.16), while respondents who had a 'Surgeon-led' approach considered this less important (M = 3.57, SD = 0.38; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Surgeon factors including demographics, behaviors, and perceptions of patient involvement influenced SDM approaches. SDM between patients and surgeons should strive to be more dynamic and tailored to each specific patient's needs to promote optimal patient-centered care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪些因素影响执行复杂手术的外科医生之间共享决策的方法?
背景:共享决策(SDM)旨在创造一种环境,让患者和外科医生共同探索治疗方案和护理目标。本研究的目的是描述与SDM相关的外科医生对患者参与的人口统计因素、行为和感知。方法:使用横断面调查方法,评估外科医生的人口统计、行为和患者参与感知。采用100分量表,从“患者主导”(0)到“外科医生主导”(100),对SDM的外科医生方法进行了测量。结果:在241名受访者中,大多数是男性(n = 67.2%)和白色(n = 124,69.3%);大约一半的外科医生执业时间≥10年(n = 120,52.4%)。外科医生对SDM的方法从0到81.0不等,中位评分为50.0(IQR:35.5,62.0)。报告的SDM方法与多年的实践、信息共享和对患者参与的感知有关。外科医生实践10 + 年中最常采用“共享、患者主导”的SDM方法(27.5%),而经验较少的人更常采用“分享、外科医生主导”的方法(33.3%,p = 0.031)。采用“患者主导”方法的外科医生认为患者参与是最重要的(M = 3.82,标准差 = 0.16),而采用“外科医生主导”方法的受访者认为这不那么重要(M = 3.57,标准差 = 0.38;p 结论:外科医生因素,包括人口统计学、行为和对患者参与的感知,影响SDM方法。患者和外科医生之间的SDM应努力更加动态,并根据每个特定患者的需求进行定制,以促进以患者为中心的最佳护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Communication in Healthcare
Journal of Communication in Healthcare Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Open access to pathology reports: potential harms and proposed solutions. The promise of AI in healthcare: transforming communication and decision-making for patients. Doctor on call: physician smartphone use during medical consultations. Public health professionals' views on climate change, advocacy, and health. Adaptation in communication technology utilization: caring for individuals with chronic conditions in South Asia during the Covid-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1