The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Clinical Interventions in Aging Pub Date : 2019-09-10 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CIA.S214367
Lauren Yates, Emese Csipke, Esme Moniz-Cook, Phuong Leung, Holly Walton, Georgina Charlesworth, Aimee Spector, Eef Hogervorst, Gail Mountain, Martin Orrell
{"title":"The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia.","authors":"Lauren Yates,&nbsp;Emese Csipke,&nbsp;Esme Moniz-Cook,&nbsp;Phuong Leung,&nbsp;Holly Walton,&nbsp;Georgina Charlesworth,&nbsp;Aimee Spector,&nbsp;Eef Hogervorst,&nbsp;Gail Mountain,&nbsp;Martin Orrell","doi":"10.2147/CIA.S214367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Support after a diagnosis of dementia may facilitate better adjustment and ongoing management of symptoms. The aim of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) study was to develop a postdiagnostic social intervention to help people live as well and as independently as possible. The intervention facilitates engagement in evidence-based stimulating cognitive, physical and social activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Theories to promote adjustment to a dementia diagnosis, including theories of social learning and self-efficacy, were reviewed alongside self-management and the selective optimization model, to form the basis of the intervention. Analyses of two longitudinal databases of older adults, and qualitative analyses of interviews of older people, people with dementia, and their carers about their experiences of dementia, informed the content and focus of the intervention. Consensus expert review involving stakeholders was conducted to synthesize key components. Participants were sourced from the British NHS, voluntary services, and patient and public involvement groups. A tailored manual-based intervention was developed with the aim for this to be delivered by an intervention provider.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence-based stimulating cognitive, physical, and social activities that have been shown to benefit people were key components of the proposed PRIDE intervention. Thirty-two participants including people with dementia (n=4), carers (n=11), dementia advisers (n=14), and older people (n=3) provided feedback on the drafts of the intervention and manual. Seven topics for activities were included (eg, \"making decisions\" and \"getting your message across\"). The manual outlines delivery of the intervention over three sessions where personalized profiles and plans for up to three activities are developed, implemented, and reviewed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A manualized intervention was constructed based on robust methodology and found to be acceptable to participants. Consultations with stakeholders played a key role in shaping the manualized PRIDE intervention and its delivery. Unlike most social interventions for dementia, the target audience for our intervention is the people with dementia themselves.</p>","PeriodicalId":48841,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CIA.S214367","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S214367","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Objective: Support after a diagnosis of dementia may facilitate better adjustment and ongoing management of symptoms. The aim of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) study was to develop a postdiagnostic social intervention to help people live as well and as independently as possible. The intervention facilitates engagement in evidence-based stimulating cognitive, physical and social activities.

Methods: Theories to promote adjustment to a dementia diagnosis, including theories of social learning and self-efficacy, were reviewed alongside self-management and the selective optimization model, to form the basis of the intervention. Analyses of two longitudinal databases of older adults, and qualitative analyses of interviews of older people, people with dementia, and their carers about their experiences of dementia, informed the content and focus of the intervention. Consensus expert review involving stakeholders was conducted to synthesize key components. Participants were sourced from the British NHS, voluntary services, and patient and public involvement groups. A tailored manual-based intervention was developed with the aim for this to be delivered by an intervention provider.

Results: Evidence-based stimulating cognitive, physical, and social activities that have been shown to benefit people were key components of the proposed PRIDE intervention. Thirty-two participants including people with dementia (n=4), carers (n=11), dementia advisers (n=14), and older people (n=3) provided feedback on the drafts of the intervention and manual. Seven topics for activities were included (eg, "making decisions" and "getting your message across"). The manual outlines delivery of the intervention over three sessions where personalized profiles and plans for up to three activities are developed, implemented, and reviewed.

Conclusion: A manualized intervention was constructed based on robust methodology and found to be acceptable to participants. Consultations with stakeholders played a key role in shaping the manualized PRIDE intervention and its delivery. Unlike most social interventions for dementia, the target audience for our intervention is the people with dementia themselves.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进痴呆症独立性(PRIDE)干预措施的发展,以增强痴呆症的独立性。
目的:痴呆症诊断后的支持可能有助于更好地调整和持续管理症状。促进痴呆症独立性(PRIDE)研究的目的是开发一种诊断后的社会干预措施,以帮助人们尽可能地过上良好和独立的生活。干预有助于参与基于证据的刺激认知、身体和社会活动。方法:回顾促进对痴呆诊断的适应的理论,包括社会学习和自我效能理论,以及自我管理和选择性优化模型,以形成干预的基础。对两个老年人纵向数据库的分析,以及对老年人、痴呆症患者及其护理人员关于痴呆症经历的访谈的定性分析,为干预的内容和重点提供了信息。对利益攸关方进行了协商一致的专家审查,以综合关键组成部分。参与者来自英国国家医疗服务体系、志愿服务机构、患者和公众参与团体。制定了一项量身定制的基于手册的干预措施,目的是由干预提供者提供。结果:基于证据的刺激认知、身体和社会活动已被证明对人们有益,是拟议的PRIDE干预的关键组成部分。32名参与者,包括痴呆症患者(n=4)、护理人员(n=11)、痴呆症顾问(n=14)和老年人(n=3),对干预措施和手册草案提供了反馈。活动包括七个主题(例如,“做出决定”和“传达信息”)。该手册概述了在三次会议上进行干预的情况,其中制定、实施和审查了多达三项活动的个性化简介和计划。结论:基于稳健的方法构建了一个手动干预,并发现参与者可以接受。与利益攸关方的协商在制定PRIDE干预措施及其实施方面发挥了关键作用。与大多数针对痴呆症的社会干预不同,我们干预的目标人群是痴呆症患者自己。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Clinical Interventions in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
193
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.
期刊最新文献
Host Response in Critically Ill Patients Aged 65 Years or Older: A Prospective Study. The Monocyte-to-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio as a Novel Predictor of the Prevalence of Senile Osteoporosis. Development and Preliminary Psychometric Testing of a Brief Tool to Measure Medication Adherence in Older Populations. Effects on Physical Functioning and Fear of Falling of a 3-Week Balneotherapy Program Alone or Associated with a Physical Activity and Educational Program in Older Adult Fallers: A Randomized-Controlled Trial. Construction of a Home Hospice Care Program for Older Adults at the End of Life with Chronic Diseases in China: A Delphi Method.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1