A Psychometric Evaluation of the Nurse Practitioner Self-efficacy Scale.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Nursing Administration Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1097/NNA.0000000000001351
Katie Azama
{"title":"A Psychometric Evaluation of the Nurse Practitioner Self-efficacy Scale.","authors":"Katie Azama","doi":"10.1097/NNA.0000000000001351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, a psychometric evaluation of the Nurse Practitioner Self-efficacy Scale (NPSES) was conducted.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-efficacy is an important concept for optimal nurse practitioner (NP) performance and retention. The NPSES may serve as a valuable instrument to support NP practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive cross-sectional study evaluated the NPSES responses from 230 NPs. Confirmatory factor analysis, reliability, and t tests were used to analyze the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis revealed acceptable goodness of fit for an 8-factor model (root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.05, comparative fit index = 0.97, Tucker Lewis index = 0.96). Reliability estimates resulted in acceptable internal consistency (coefficient α = 0.94). The t tests comparing more and less experienced NPs resulted in higher scores in more experienced NPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This validation study showed that the NPSES is a psychometrically-sound instrument to assess NP self-efficacy. The NPSES is a cost-effective and convenient method to measure self-efficacy, a valuable concept for NP practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Administration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001351","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this study, a psychometric evaluation of the Nurse Practitioner Self-efficacy Scale (NPSES) was conducted.

Background: Self-efficacy is an important concept for optimal nurse practitioner (NP) performance and retention. The NPSES may serve as a valuable instrument to support NP practice.

Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study evaluated the NPSES responses from 230 NPs. Confirmatory factor analysis, reliability, and t tests were used to analyze the results.

Results: Confirmatory factor analysis revealed acceptable goodness of fit for an 8-factor model (root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.05, comparative fit index = 0.97, Tucker Lewis index = 0.96). Reliability estimates resulted in acceptable internal consistency (coefficient α = 0.94). The t tests comparing more and less experienced NPs resulted in higher scores in more experienced NPs.

Conclusion: This validation study showed that the NPSES is a psychometrically-sound instrument to assess NP self-efficacy. The NPSES is a cost-effective and convenient method to measure self-efficacy, a valuable concept for NP practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
执业护士自我效能感量表的心理测量评估。
目的:对执业护士自我效能感量表(NPSES)进行心理测量评估。背景:自我效能感是最佳执业护士(NP)表现和保留的一个重要概念。NPSES可以作为一个有价值的工具来支持NP实践。方法:本描述性横断面研究评估了230名NPs的NPSES反应。采用验证性因素分析、信度和t检验对结果进行分析。结果:验证性因素分析显示,8因素模型的拟合优度可接受(近似均方根误差=0.05,比较拟合指数=0.97,Tucker Lewis指数=0.96)。可靠性估计产生了可接受的内部一致性(系数α=0.94)。比较经验丰富和经验不足的NP的t检验导致经验丰富的NP得分更高结论:本验证研究表明,NPSES是一种评估NP自我效能的心理测量工具。NPSES是衡量自我效能的一种成本效益高、方便的方法,是NP实践的一个有价值的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​JONA™ is the authoritative source of information on developments and advances in patient care leadership. Content is geared to nurse executives, directors of nursing, and nurse managers in hospital, community health, and ambulatory care environments. Practical, innovative, and solution-oriented articles provide the tools and data needed to excel in executive practice in changing healthcare systems: leadership development; human, material, and financial resource management and relationships; systems, business, and financial strategies. All articles are peer-reviewed, selected and developed with the guidance of a distinguished group of editorial advisors.
期刊最新文献
National Incidence of Nurse Suicide and Associated Features. Exploring Reasons for Satisfaction with Job Assignments Among Travel Nurses. Institution-Wide Moral Distress Among Nurses. Measuring Professional Governance: The Swedish Version of the Verran Professional Governance Scale©. Advanced Practice Nurse-Led Research: Challenges and Approaches to Digital Health Programs' Evaluation Using Big Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1