Effect of educational intervention on computer-aided-design and computer-aided-manufacturing technology to preclinical dental students

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Dental Education Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1111/eje.12953
Kathleen Fischer, Michael Metz, Michael Sekula, Diksha Katwal, David Hannigan, Tarin Williams
{"title":"Effect of educational intervention on computer-aided-design and computer-aided-manufacturing technology to preclinical dental students","authors":"Kathleen Fischer,&nbsp;Michael Metz,&nbsp;Michael Sekula,&nbsp;Diksha Katwal,&nbsp;David Hannigan,&nbsp;Tarin Williams","doi":"10.1111/eje.12953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the effectiveness of a video presentation instruction compared to the prevailing traditional lecture provided in the preclinical classroom when introducing computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study was conducted as a controlled educational trial (single-blind) on 120 first-year dental students. Students were assigned to two learning groups: the control (<i>n</i> = 60, traditional lecture) and the intervention (<i>n</i> = 60, video presentation). Both groups completed a self-efficacy scale (SES) survey before instruction. Then, the intervention group actively participated in a one-session video presentation while the control group was given a traditional lecture. After the presentations, student knowledge was assessed with a hands-on simulated exercise that was scored out of 60 points. At last, students completed a post-instruction student perception and attitude (SPA) survey. Inferential hypothesis testing was conducted with two-sample <i>t</i>-tests, and significance was defined as <i>p</i> ≤ .05.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were no significant differences in the student pre-instruction SES scores between the control and intervention groups. After the video learning, CAD/CAM knowledge application during the hands-on simulated exercise showed significantly higher results in the intervention group as the assessment scores from the intervention group averaged 13.6 ± 2.0 points higher than the control group (<i>p</i> &lt; .001). The results from the post-instruction SPA survey showed no statistically significant difference between groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>With the video presentation technique, our first-year dental students were able to greatly enhance their CAD/CAM application skills. The results from this study could be applied at other dental educational institutions with potential similar outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":"28 1","pages":"320-327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eje.12953","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a video presentation instruction compared to the prevailing traditional lecture provided in the preclinical classroom when introducing computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology.

Materials and Methods

This study was conducted as a controlled educational trial (single-blind) on 120 first-year dental students. Students were assigned to two learning groups: the control (n = 60, traditional lecture) and the intervention (n = 60, video presentation). Both groups completed a self-efficacy scale (SES) survey before instruction. Then, the intervention group actively participated in a one-session video presentation while the control group was given a traditional lecture. After the presentations, student knowledge was assessed with a hands-on simulated exercise that was scored out of 60 points. At last, students completed a post-instruction student perception and attitude (SPA) survey. Inferential hypothesis testing was conducted with two-sample t-tests, and significance was defined as p ≤ .05.

Results

There were no significant differences in the student pre-instruction SES scores between the control and intervention groups. After the video learning, CAD/CAM knowledge application during the hands-on simulated exercise showed significantly higher results in the intervention group as the assessment scores from the intervention group averaged 13.6 ± 2.0 points higher than the control group (p < .001). The results from the post-instruction SPA survey showed no statistically significant difference between groups.

Conclusion

With the video presentation technique, our first-year dental students were able to greatly enhance their CAD/CAM application skills. The results from this study could be applied at other dental educational institutions with potential similar outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育干预对临床前牙科学生计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造技术的影响。
引言:本研究评估了在引入计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)技术时,与临床前课堂上流行的传统讲座相比,视频演示教学的有效性。材料和方法:本研究作为一项对照教育试验(单盲)在120名一年级牙科学生中进行。学生被分为两组:对照组(n = 60,传统讲座)和干预(n = 60、视频演示)。两组在教学前均完成了自我效能感量表(SES)调查。然后,干预组积极参与一次会议的视频演示,而对照组则进行传统讲座。演讲结束后,学生们通过动手模拟练习对知识进行了评估,得分为60分。最后,学生完成了一项课后学生感知与态度(SPA)调查。推断假设检验采用两个样本t检验,显著性定义为p ≤ .05.结果:对照组和干预组的学生课前SES得分无显著差异。视频学习后,干预组在动手模拟练习中的CAD/CAM知识应用显示出显著更高的结果,干预组的评估得分平均为13.6 ± 比对照组高2.0分(p 结论:通过视频演示技术,我们的一年级牙科学生能够大大提高他们的CAD/CAM应用技能。这项研究的结果可以应用于其他具有潜在类似结果的牙科教育机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the European Journal of Dental Education is to publish original topical and review articles of the highest quality in the field of Dental Education. The Journal seeks to disseminate widely the latest information on curriculum development teaching methodologies assessment techniques and quality assurance in the fields of dental undergraduate and postgraduate education and dental auxiliary personnel training. The scope includes the dental educational aspects of the basic medical sciences the behavioural sciences the interface with medical education information technology and distance learning and educational audit. Papers embodying the results of high-quality educational research of relevance to dentistry are particularly encouraged as are evidence-based reports of novel and established educational programmes and their outcomes.
期刊最新文献
The Graduating European Dentist Curriculum Framework: A 7-Year Review. Beyond the Drill: Understanding Empathy Among Undergraduate Dental Students. Future-Proofing Dentistry: A Qualitative Exploration of COVID-19 Responses in UK Dental Schools. Mapping the Landscape of Generative Language Models in Dental Education: A Comparison Between ChatGPT and Google Bard. Performance of a Generative Pre-Trained Transformer in Generating Scientific Abstracts in Dentistry: A Comparative Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1