Kathleen Fischer, Michael Metz, Michael Sekula, Diksha Katwal, David Hannigan, Tarin Williams
{"title":"Effect of educational intervention on computer-aided-design and computer-aided-manufacturing technology to preclinical dental students","authors":"Kathleen Fischer, Michael Metz, Michael Sekula, Diksha Katwal, David Hannigan, Tarin Williams","doi":"10.1111/eje.12953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the effectiveness of a video presentation instruction compared to the prevailing traditional lecture provided in the preclinical classroom when introducing computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study was conducted as a controlled educational trial (single-blind) on 120 first-year dental students. Students were assigned to two learning groups: the control (<i>n</i> = 60, traditional lecture) and the intervention (<i>n</i> = 60, video presentation). Both groups completed a self-efficacy scale (SES) survey before instruction. Then, the intervention group actively participated in a one-session video presentation while the control group was given a traditional lecture. After the presentations, student knowledge was assessed with a hands-on simulated exercise that was scored out of 60 points. At last, students completed a post-instruction student perception and attitude (SPA) survey. Inferential hypothesis testing was conducted with two-sample <i>t</i>-tests, and significance was defined as <i>p</i> ≤ .05.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were no significant differences in the student pre-instruction SES scores between the control and intervention groups. After the video learning, CAD/CAM knowledge application during the hands-on simulated exercise showed significantly higher results in the intervention group as the assessment scores from the intervention group averaged 13.6 ± 2.0 points higher than the control group (<i>p</i> < .001). The results from the post-instruction SPA survey showed no statistically significant difference between groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>With the video presentation technique, our first-year dental students were able to greatly enhance their CAD/CAM application skills. The results from this study could be applied at other dental educational institutions with potential similar outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":"28 1","pages":"320-327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eje.12953","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
This study evaluated the effectiveness of a video presentation instruction compared to the prevailing traditional lecture provided in the preclinical classroom when introducing computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology.
Materials and Methods
This study was conducted as a controlled educational trial (single-blind) on 120 first-year dental students. Students were assigned to two learning groups: the control (n = 60, traditional lecture) and the intervention (n = 60, video presentation). Both groups completed a self-efficacy scale (SES) survey before instruction. Then, the intervention group actively participated in a one-session video presentation while the control group was given a traditional lecture. After the presentations, student knowledge was assessed with a hands-on simulated exercise that was scored out of 60 points. At last, students completed a post-instruction student perception and attitude (SPA) survey. Inferential hypothesis testing was conducted with two-sample t-tests, and significance was defined as p ≤ .05.
Results
There were no significant differences in the student pre-instruction SES scores between the control and intervention groups. After the video learning, CAD/CAM knowledge application during the hands-on simulated exercise showed significantly higher results in the intervention group as the assessment scores from the intervention group averaged 13.6 ± 2.0 points higher than the control group (p < .001). The results from the post-instruction SPA survey showed no statistically significant difference between groups.
Conclusion
With the video presentation technique, our first-year dental students were able to greatly enhance their CAD/CAM application skills. The results from this study could be applied at other dental educational institutions with potential similar outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the European Journal of Dental Education is to publish original topical and review articles of the highest quality in the field of Dental Education. The Journal seeks to disseminate widely the latest information on curriculum development teaching methodologies assessment techniques and quality assurance in the fields of dental undergraduate and postgraduate education and dental auxiliary personnel training. The scope includes the dental educational aspects of the basic medical sciences the behavioural sciences the interface with medical education information technology and distance learning and educational audit. Papers embodying the results of high-quality educational research of relevance to dentistry are particularly encouraged as are evidence-based reports of novel and established educational programmes and their outcomes.