Barriers to penicillin allergy de-labeling in the inpatient and outpatient settings: a qualitative study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1186/s13223-023-00842-y
Esra Alagoz, Megan Saucke, Prakash Balasubramanian, Paul Lata, Tyler Liebenstein, Sujani Kakumanu
{"title":"Barriers to penicillin allergy de-labeling in the inpatient and outpatient settings: a qualitative study.","authors":"Esra Alagoz, Megan Saucke, Prakash Balasubramanian, Paul Lata, Tyler Liebenstein, Sujani Kakumanu","doi":"10.1186/s13223-023-00842-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Penicillin allergy is the most commonly reported drug allergy in the US. Despite evidence demonstrating that up to 90% of labels are incorrect, scalable interventions are not well established. As part of a larger mixed methods investigation, we conducted a qualitative study to describe the barriers to implementing a risk-based penicillin de-labeling protocol within a single site Veteran's hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted individual and group interviews with multidisciplinary inpatient and outpatient healthcare teams. The interview guides were developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explore workflows and contextual factors influencing identification and evaluation of patients with penicillin allergy. Three researchers iteratively developed the codebook based on TDF domains and coded the data using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 20 clinicians. Participants included three hospitalists, five inpatient pharmacists, one infectious disease physician, two anti-microbial stewardship pharmacists, four primary care providers, two outpatient pharmacists, two resident physicians, and a nurse case manager for the allergy service. The factors that contributed to barriers to penicillin allergy evaluation and de-labeling were classified under six TDF domains; knowledge, skills, beliefs about capabilities, beliefs about consequences, professional role and identity, and environmental context and resources. Participants from all groups acknowledged the importance of penicillin de-labeling. However, they lacked confidence in their skills to perform the necessary evaluations, such as test dose challenges. The fear of inducing an allergic reaction and adding further complexity to patient care exacerbated their reluctance to de-label patients. The lack of ownership of de-labeling initiative was another significant obstacle in establishing consistent clinical workflows. Additionally, heavy workloads, competing priorities, and ease of access to alternative antibiotics prevented the prioritization of tasks related to de-labeling. Space limitations and nursing staff shortages added to challenges in outpatient settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrated that barriers to penicillin allergy de-labeling fall under multiple behavioral domains. Better role clarification, opportunities to develop necessary skills, and dedicated resources are needed to overcome these barriers. Future interventions will need to employ a systemic approach that addresses each of the behavioral domains influencing penicillin allergy de-labeling with stakeholder engagement of the inpatient and outpatient health care teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":51302,"journal":{"name":"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology","volume":"19 1","pages":"88"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-023-00842-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Penicillin allergy is the most commonly reported drug allergy in the US. Despite evidence demonstrating that up to 90% of labels are incorrect, scalable interventions are not well established. As part of a larger mixed methods investigation, we conducted a qualitative study to describe the barriers to implementing a risk-based penicillin de-labeling protocol within a single site Veteran's hospital.

Methods: We conducted individual and group interviews with multidisciplinary inpatient and outpatient healthcare teams. The interview guides were developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explore workflows and contextual factors influencing identification and evaluation of patients with penicillin allergy. Three researchers iteratively developed the codebook based on TDF domains and coded the data using thematic analysis.

Results: We interviewed 20 clinicians. Participants included three hospitalists, five inpatient pharmacists, one infectious disease physician, two anti-microbial stewardship pharmacists, four primary care providers, two outpatient pharmacists, two resident physicians, and a nurse case manager for the allergy service. The factors that contributed to barriers to penicillin allergy evaluation and de-labeling were classified under six TDF domains; knowledge, skills, beliefs about capabilities, beliefs about consequences, professional role and identity, and environmental context and resources. Participants from all groups acknowledged the importance of penicillin de-labeling. However, they lacked confidence in their skills to perform the necessary evaluations, such as test dose challenges. The fear of inducing an allergic reaction and adding further complexity to patient care exacerbated their reluctance to de-label patients. The lack of ownership of de-labeling initiative was another significant obstacle in establishing consistent clinical workflows. Additionally, heavy workloads, competing priorities, and ease of access to alternative antibiotics prevented the prioritization of tasks related to de-labeling. Space limitations and nursing staff shortages added to challenges in outpatient settings.

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that barriers to penicillin allergy de-labeling fall under multiple behavioral domains. Better role clarification, opportunities to develop necessary skills, and dedicated resources are needed to overcome these barriers. Future interventions will need to employ a systemic approach that addresses each of the behavioral domains influencing penicillin allergy de-labeling with stakeholder engagement of the inpatient and outpatient health care teams.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院和门诊环境中青霉素过敏去标签的障碍:一项定性研究。
背景:青霉素过敏是美国最常见的药物过敏报告。尽管有证据表明高达90%的标签是不正确的,但可扩展的干预措施还没有建立起来。作为一项更大规模的混合方法调查的一部分,我们进行了一项定性研究,以描述在一家退伍军人医院内实施基于风险的青霉素去标签方案的障碍。方法:我们对多学科住院和门诊医疗团队进行了个人和小组访谈。访谈指南是使用理论领域框架(TDF)开发的,旨在探讨影响青霉素过敏患者识别和评估的工作流程和背景因素。三名研究人员基于TDF域迭代开发了代码簿,并使用主题分析对数据进行了编码。结果:我们采访了20名临床医生。参与者包括三名住院医生、五名住院药剂师、一名传染病医生、两名抗微生物管理药剂师、四名初级保健提供者、两名门诊药剂师、两名住院医生和一名过敏服务护士病例经理。导致青霉素过敏评估和去标记障碍的因素分为六个TDF结构域;知识、技能、对能力的信念、对后果的信念、职业角色和身份以及环境背景和资源。所有小组的参与者都承认青霉素去标签的重要性。然而,他们对自己进行必要评估的技能缺乏信心,例如测试剂量挑战。对引发过敏反应和增加患者护理复杂性的恐惧加剧了他们对患者标签的不情愿。缺乏去标签倡议的所有权是建立一致的临床工作流程的另一个重大障碍。此外,繁重的工作量、相互竞争的优先级以及替代抗生素的易用性阻碍了与去标签相关的任务的优先级。空间限制和护理人员短缺增加了门诊环境中的挑战。结论:我们的研究结果表明,青霉素过敏去标记的障碍属于多个行为领域。需要更好地阐明角色、发展必要技能的机会和专门的资源来克服这些障碍。未来的干预措施需要采用系统的方法,通过住院和门诊医疗团队的利益相关者参与,解决影响青霉素过敏去标签的每个行为领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
96
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology (AACI), the official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (CSACI), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and treatment of allergic and immunologic disease. By offering a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions, AACI provides a platform for the dissemination of allergy and clinical immunology research and reviews amongst allergists, pulmonologists, immunologists and other physicians, healthcare workers, medical students and the public worldwide. AACI reports on basic research and clinically applied studies in the following areas and other related topics: asthma and occupational lung disease, rhinoconjunctivitis and rhinosinusitis, drug hypersensitivity, allergic skin diseases, urticaria and angioedema, venom hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis and food allergy, immunotherapy, immune modulators and biologics, immune deficiency and autoimmunity, T cell and B cell functions, regulatory T cells, natural killer cells, mast cell and eosinophil functions, complement abnormalities.
期刊最新文献
Introduction from the editors. Nasal food challenge with hen's egg white allergen. Inborn errors of immunity (primary immunodeficiencies). Immunoglobulin replacement therapy in patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies: impact of infusion method on immunoglobulin-specific perceptions of quality of life and treatment satisfaction. Retraction Note: Clinical and immuno-proteomic approach on lantana camara pollen allergy-a major health hazard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1