Health Topics Emerged From Brief Motivational Interviewing: A randomized clinical trial.

Michelle Arnett, Danna R Paulson, Michael D Evans, Christine Blue, Yvette G Reibel
{"title":"Health Topics Emerged From Brief Motivational Interviewing: A randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Michelle Arnett,&nbsp;Danna R Paulson,&nbsp;Michael D Evans,&nbsp;Christine Blue,&nbsp;Yvette G Reibel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> The goal of this study was to analyze transcription of audio recordings to determine health topics that emerged from brief-motivational interviewing (MI) compared to traditional oral hygiene instructions (OHI).<b>Methods</b> Fifty-eight periodontal maintenance patients were randomized to a brief-MI or traditional OHI group for a longitudinal 1-year clinical trial. Both groups received four patient education sessions per their assigned group. Audio recordings were transcribed and coded. The overarching themes and subthemes emerged were quantified and reported as the number of instances per participant. Global scores and behavioral counts were compared across baseline, 4, 8, and 12-month research visits using mixed-effect models.<b>Results</b> Of the six overarching themes, the brief-MI group evoked more topics toward total health. Oral home care behaviors (15 vs 10.2) and oral diseases/conditions (3.3 vs 1.9) were discussed more in the brief-MI group compared to the traditional OHI group. This positive outcome for the average number of times a health topic was discussed in the brief-MI group compared to the traditional OHI group continued for the remaining major themes: lifestyle behaviors (1.0 vs 0.4), nutrition (2.6 vs 0.8), emotional/mental health (1.8 vs 0.8) and general health (1.2 vs 0.4).<b>Conclusion</b> This study identified that brief-MI was a more successful communication approach to increase discussions of oral home care behaviors, oral diseases/conditions, lifestyle behaviors, nutrition, emotional/mental health and general health compared to traditional OHI in individuals with periodontitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":52471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","volume":"97 5","pages":"116-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The goal of this study was to analyze transcription of audio recordings to determine health topics that emerged from brief-motivational interviewing (MI) compared to traditional oral hygiene instructions (OHI).Methods Fifty-eight periodontal maintenance patients were randomized to a brief-MI or traditional OHI group for a longitudinal 1-year clinical trial. Both groups received four patient education sessions per their assigned group. Audio recordings were transcribed and coded. The overarching themes and subthemes emerged were quantified and reported as the number of instances per participant. Global scores and behavioral counts were compared across baseline, 4, 8, and 12-month research visits using mixed-effect models.Results Of the six overarching themes, the brief-MI group evoked more topics toward total health. Oral home care behaviors (15 vs 10.2) and oral diseases/conditions (3.3 vs 1.9) were discussed more in the brief-MI group compared to the traditional OHI group. This positive outcome for the average number of times a health topic was discussed in the brief-MI group compared to the traditional OHI group continued for the remaining major themes: lifestyle behaviors (1.0 vs 0.4), nutrition (2.6 vs 0.8), emotional/mental health (1.8 vs 0.8) and general health (1.2 vs 0.4).Conclusion This study identified that brief-MI was a more successful communication approach to increase discussions of oral home care behaviors, oral diseases/conditions, lifestyle behaviors, nutrition, emotional/mental health and general health compared to traditional OHI in individuals with periodontitis.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简短动机访谈引发的健康话题:一项随机临床试验。
目的本研究的目的是分析录音的转录,以确定与传统口腔卫生指导(OHI)相比,简短动机访谈(MI)产生的健康主题。两组都接受了四次患者教育。录音被转录并编码。出现的总体主题和子主题被量化并报告为每个参与者的实例数量。使用混合效应模型比较基线、4个月、8个月和12个月研究访问的总体得分和行为计数。结果在六个总体主题中,简短MI组唤起了更多关于全面健康的主题。与传统OHI组相比,短暂MI组对口腔家庭护理行为(15 vs 10.2)和口腔疾病/状况(3.3 vs 1.9)的讨论更多。与传统OHI组相比,简短MI组讨论健康主题的平均次数的积极结果继续用于其余主要主题:生活方式行为(1.0 vs 0.4)、营养(2.6 vs 0.8)、,情绪/心理健康(1.8 vs 0.8)和一般健康(1.2 vs 0.4)。结论本研究发现,与传统的牙周炎患者OHI相比,简短MI是一种更成功的沟通方式,可以增加对口腔家庭护理行为、口腔疾病/状况、生活方式行为、营养、情绪/心理卫生和一般健康的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Hygiene is the refereed, scientific publication of the American Dental Hygienists’ Association. It promotes the publication of original research related to the practice and education of dental hygiene. It supports the development and dissemination of a dental hygiene body of knowledge through scientific inquiry in basic, applied, and clinical research.
期刊最新文献
Advances and Challenges in Pediatric Oral Health. DIY Orthodontic Relapse Correction Gone Wrong: A case study. Fluoride in 2025. The Role of Reporting Guidelines in Research Publication. Improving Dental Hygiene Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Confidence Toward Prenatal Oral Health Through Experiential Learning: A pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1