EFFECTS OF REHABILITATION PROGRAM FOCUSED ON IMPROVING REAL-LIFE DAILY ACTIVITIES OF PATIENTS WITH MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENTS OR DEMENTIA AND THEIR CAREGIVERS.

Yohei Otaka, Shin Kitamura, Megumi Suzuki, Akiko Maeda, Chinami Kato, Rena Ito, Asuka Hirano, Yuki Okochi, Koji Mizutani, Hiroshi Yoshino, Hajime Takechi
{"title":"EFFECTS OF REHABILITATION PROGRAM FOCUSED ON IMPROVING REAL-LIFE DAILY ACTIVITIES OF PATIENTS WITH MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENTS OR DEMENTIA AND THEIR CAREGIVERS.","authors":"Yohei Otaka,&nbsp;Shin Kitamura,&nbsp;Megumi Suzuki,&nbsp;Akiko Maeda,&nbsp;Chinami Kato,&nbsp;Rena Ito,&nbsp;Asuka Hirano,&nbsp;Yuki Okochi,&nbsp;Koji Mizutani,&nbsp;Hiroshi Yoshino,&nbsp;Hajime Takechi","doi":"10.2340/jrmcc.v6.12293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of a dyadic outpatient rehabilitation program focused on improving the real-life daily activities of patients with mild cognitive impairments or dementia and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Eight patients with mild cognitive impairments or dementia and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The rehabilitation program comprised eight 1-hour sessions by occupational therapists with patients and his/her caregivers. Patients were assessed for motor function, cognitive function, and quality of life, and their caregivers were assessed for depression and caregiver burden. Participants were assessed at pre-program and post-program, and 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scores of caregiver-assessed Quality of life in Alzheimer's disease scale in patients significantly improved at post-program (median [interquartile range], 30.0 [7.0]) compared with pre-program (27.0 [2.8], effect size = 0.77, <i>p</i> = 0.029). In caregivers, the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview scores decreased significantly at post-program (16.5 [13.0]) compared with pre-program (22.0 [17.5], effect size = 0.72, <i>p</i> = 0.042). There were no significant differences in other assessments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rehabilitation program focused on real daily activities and demonstrated to improve patients' quality of life and caregivers' depression and caring burden through patient-caregiver interaction. Future enhanced follow-up systems are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":73929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","volume":"6 ","pages":"12293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/68/3e/JRMCC-6-12293.PMC10566518.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrmcc.v6.12293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a dyadic outpatient rehabilitation program focused on improving the real-life daily activities of patients with mild cognitive impairments or dementia and their caregivers.

Design: Retrospective study.

Subjects: Eight patients with mild cognitive impairments or dementia and their caregivers.

Methods: The rehabilitation program comprised eight 1-hour sessions by occupational therapists with patients and his/her caregivers. Patients were assessed for motor function, cognitive function, and quality of life, and their caregivers were assessed for depression and caregiver burden. Participants were assessed at pre-program and post-program, and 3-month follow-up.

Results: The scores of caregiver-assessed Quality of life in Alzheimer's disease scale in patients significantly improved at post-program (median [interquartile range], 30.0 [7.0]) compared with pre-program (27.0 [2.8], effect size = 0.77, p = 0.029). In caregivers, the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview scores decreased significantly at post-program (16.5 [13.0]) compared with pre-program (22.0 [17.5], effect size = 0.72, p = 0.042). There were no significant differences in other assessments.

Conclusions: The rehabilitation program focused on real daily activities and demonstrated to improve patients' quality of life and caregivers' depression and caring burden through patient-caregiver interaction. Future enhanced follow-up systems are warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康复计划的效果集中在改善轻度认知障碍或痴呆患者及其护理人员的日常生活活动上。
目的:评估二元门诊康复计划的有效性,该计划旨在改善轻度认知障碍或痴呆患者及其护理人员的日常活动。设计:回顾性研究。受试者:8名轻度认知障碍或痴呆症患者及其护理人员。方法:康复计划由职业治疗师与患者及其护理人员进行8次1小时的治疗。对患者的运动功能、认知功能和生活质量进行评估,并对其护理人员的抑郁和护理负担进行评估。参与者在项目前和项目后以及3个月的随访中进行了评估。结果:与项目前(27.0[2.8],影响大小=0.77,p=0.029)相比,项目后患者阿尔茨海默病护理者评估的生活质量评分(中位数[四分位间距],30.0[7.0])显著提高,与项目前(22.0[17.5],效果大小=0.72,p=0.042)相比,项目后(16.5[13.0])的Zarit护理人员负担访谈得分显著下降。其他评估没有显著差异。结论:康复计划侧重于真实的日常活动,并证明通过患者与护理人员的互动可以改善患者的生活质量和护理人员的抑郁和护理负担。今后有必要加强后续行动系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CHARACTERIZATION OF BASELINE SYMPTOMS AND FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS IN A LARGE COHORT OF OUTPATIENTS ATTENDING A LONG COVID REHABILITATION CLINIC IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. EFFECTIVENESS OF RADIAL EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE THERAPY IN THE LOCAL MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTONIA (SPASTICITY AND DYSTONIA) IN PATIENTS WITH CEREBRAL PALSY. INPATIENT REHABILITATION AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF A CASE OF ANTI-SRP IMMUNE-MEDIATED NECROTIZING MYOPATHY. EXPLORING THE FEASIBILITY OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA INJECTIONS FOR INTERVERTEBRAL DISCOPATHY: A PILOT STUDY. FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH POST COVID-19 CONDITION AFTER A MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM ASSESSMENT: A PILOT STUDY.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1