Biomechanical effect of increased number of suture strands on rotator cuff repair in a bovine model.

Jiaqi Cheng, Zhijie Li, Chunbing Luo, Hui Ben, Yucheng Sun
{"title":"Biomechanical effect of increased number of suture strands on rotator cuff repair in a bovine model.","authors":"Jiaqi Cheng, Zhijie Li, Chunbing Luo, Hui Ben, Yucheng Sun","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2023.23042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate if there was a link between the biomechanical properties and the number of suture strands in repairing a rotator cuff (RC) tear in a bovine model using the transosseous technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-four fresh tendons from bovine (mean age: 7.1 ± 0.5 months; range 6.5-7.5 months) and 1 humeral head from porcine (8.5 months) were used in this study. All the specimens had no apparent abnormalities. Using the transosseous structure, the RC tendon was detached from the greater tuberosity and randomly assigned to 3-strand, 4-strand, 5-strand, and 6-strand groups, with the glenohumeral abducted at 0° and 90°. Biomechanical tests were conducted to compare the groups' differences in the failure mode, pull-toextension load in the 1-, 2-, and 3-mm formations, and the maximum load. The analysis of variance test was performed to compare the results. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed among the groups concerning the tendon characteristics (all P ≥ .05). At 90° shoulder abduction, a significant difference was detected in the load between 3- and 5-strand groups for 1-mm gap formation (P=.049). No statistical differences were noted in the load at the gap displacements in the 1-, 2-, and 3-mm formations at 0° and 90° shoulder abduction (all P > .05). The maximum failure load and extension in maximal tension increased with the number of sutures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The maximum load and ultimate extension increase with the number of sutures at both positions. The number of sutures was not an influencing factor of gap formation. Regarding the tear size and tension of the RC, choosing the appropriate number of strands individually instead of excessively increasing the number of sutures is advocated for RC repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10837599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2023.23042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate if there was a link between the biomechanical properties and the number of suture strands in repairing a rotator cuff (RC) tear in a bovine model using the transosseous technique.

Methods: Fifty-four fresh tendons from bovine (mean age: 7.1 ± 0.5 months; range 6.5-7.5 months) and 1 humeral head from porcine (8.5 months) were used in this study. All the specimens had no apparent abnormalities. Using the transosseous structure, the RC tendon was detached from the greater tuberosity and randomly assigned to 3-strand, 4-strand, 5-strand, and 6-strand groups, with the glenohumeral abducted at 0° and 90°. Biomechanical tests were conducted to compare the groups' differences in the failure mode, pull-toextension load in the 1-, 2-, and 3-mm formations, and the maximum load. The analysis of variance test was performed to compare the results. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

Results: No significant difference was observed among the groups concerning the tendon characteristics (all P ≥ .05). At 90° shoulder abduction, a significant difference was detected in the load between 3- and 5-strand groups for 1-mm gap formation (P=.049). No statistical differences were noted in the load at the gap displacements in the 1-, 2-, and 3-mm formations at 0° and 90° shoulder abduction (all P > .05). The maximum failure load and extension in maximal tension increased with the number of sutures.

Conclusion: The maximum load and ultimate extension increase with the number of sutures at both positions. The number of sutures was not an influencing factor of gap formation. Regarding the tear size and tension of the RC, choosing the appropriate number of strands individually instead of excessively increasing the number of sutures is advocated for RC repair.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增加缝合线股数对牛肩袖修复的生物力学影响。
目的:本研究旨在探讨在使用经骨技术修复牛肩袖(RC)撕裂的模型中,生物力学特性与缝合线数量之间是否存在联系。方法:采用牛新鲜肌腱54根(平均年龄7.1±0.5个月,6.5-7.5个月)和猪肱骨头1根(8.5个月)。所有标本均无明显异常。使用经骨结构,将RC肌腱从大结节上分离,并随机分为3股、4股、5股和6股组,肩关节在0°和90°处外展。进行生物力学测试,比较各组在失败模式、1、2和3毫米编队中的拉趾伸展负荷以及最大负荷方面的差异。进行方差分析检验以比较结果。统计学显著性设置为P<.05。结果:各组肌腱特征无显著差异(均P≥.05)。在90°肩外展时,3组和5组之间1 mm间隙形成的载荷存在显著差异(P=.049),在0°和90°肩外展时形成3mm(均P>0.05)。最大失效载荷和最大张力下的延伸随着缝合次数的增加而增加。结论:两个位置的最大负荷和极限伸展都随着缝合次数的增加而增加。缝合线的数量不是间隙形成的影响因素。关于RC的撕裂尺寸和张力,建议单独选择适当数量的股线,而不是过度增加缝合线的数量来进行RC修复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of spinopelvic relationship among Turkish orthopedic surgeons in total joint replacement: a survey. Asymptomatic iatrogenic bilateral occlusion of vertebral artery after atlantoaxial fusion: a case report. Bibliometric analysis of the Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica from 2013 to 2022. Comparison of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis and mosaicplasty in the treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus. Comparison of mechanical stability of modified pedicle screw fixator and unilateral lumbopelvic fixation for treating sacroiliac joint disruption: A finite element analysis study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1