Use of polyglycolic acid-hyaluronic acid/β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold with or without mesenchymal stem cells found ineffective in treating osteochondral lesions in rabbit knees.

Erdem Er, Arman Vahabi, Elcil Kaya Biçer, Özlem Yılmaz, Semih Aydoğdu
{"title":"Use of polyglycolic acid-hyaluronic acid/β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold with or without mesenchymal stem cells found ineffective in treating osteochondral lesions in rabbit knees.","authors":"Erdem Er, Arman Vahabi, Elcil Kaya Biçer, Özlem Yılmaz, Semih Aydoğdu","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2023.23054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this experimental animal study, a novel bilayered scaffold used in the treatment of osteochondral defects in rabbit knees was evaluated. This novel scaffold's upper (cartilage) layer consists of polyglycolic acid and hyaluronic acid, and the lower (bone) layer consists of β-tricalcium phosphate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this novel scaffold, combined with or without mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), in the treatment of osteochondral defects in rabbit knees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Osteochondral defects were created in the left femoral trochlea of 30 rabbits. In group A, defects were treated with scaffold combined with MSCs; in group B, defects were treated with cell-free scaffolds; and group C was a control group with defects left untreated. In the 12th week, animals were sacrificed for macroscopic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) macroscopic scores were 4.95 for group A, 6.16 for group B, and 8.25 for group C. The mean Oswestry Arthroscopic Scores (OAS) were 1.65 for group A, 3.39 for group B, and 6.05 for group C. The macroscopic scores were significantly higher in group C than group A for ICRS scores and group A and group B for OAS (P < .001, P < .000, P < .022).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In essence, our findings indicate that the newly developed osteochondral scaffold, when tested in a rabbit model, is not as effective as expected in repairing full-thickness osteochondral defects, with or without the supplementation of MSCs. Further investigation is required to enhance the effectiveness of this novel combination.</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10724785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2023.23054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this experimental animal study, a novel bilayered scaffold used in the treatment of osteochondral defects in rabbit knees was evaluated. This novel scaffold's upper (cartilage) layer consists of polyglycolic acid and hyaluronic acid, and the lower (bone) layer consists of β-tricalcium phosphate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this novel scaffold, combined with or without mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), in the treatment of osteochondral defects in rabbit knees.

Methods: Osteochondral defects were created in the left femoral trochlea of 30 rabbits. In group A, defects were treated with scaffold combined with MSCs; in group B, defects were treated with cell-free scaffolds; and group C was a control group with defects left untreated. In the 12th week, animals were sacrificed for macroscopic evaluation.

Results: The mean International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) macroscopic scores were 4.95 for group A, 6.16 for group B, and 8.25 for group C. The mean Oswestry Arthroscopic Scores (OAS) were 1.65 for group A, 3.39 for group B, and 6.05 for group C. The macroscopic scores were significantly higher in group C than group A for ICRS scores and group A and group B for OAS (P < .001, P < .000, P < .022).

Conclusion: In essence, our findings indicate that the newly developed osteochondral scaffold, when tested in a rabbit model, is not as effective as expected in repairing full-thickness osteochondral defects, with or without the supplementation of MSCs. Further investigation is required to enhance the effectiveness of this novel combination.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用聚乙醇酸-透明质酸/β-磷酸三钙支架,无论是否使用间充质干细胞,对治疗兔膝关节骨软骨损伤无效。
目的:在实验动物研究中,评价了一种新型双层支架治疗兔膝关节骨软骨缺损的效果。这种新型支架的上层(软骨)由聚乙醇酸和透明质酸组成,下层(骨)由β-磷酸三钙组成。本研究的目的是评估这种新型支架结合或不结合间充质干细胞(MSC)治疗兔膝骨软骨缺损的疗效。方法:对30只兔左股骨滑车进行骨软骨缺损修复。A组采用支架结合骨髓间充质干细胞治疗缺损;B组采用无细胞支架治疗;而C组是未经处理的缺陷的对照组。在第12周,处死动物进行宏观评估。结果:国际软骨修复学会(ICRS)的平均宏观评分A组为4.95分,B组为6.16分,C组为8.25分。Oswestry关节镜评分(OAS)A组为1.65分、B组为3.39分、C组为6.05分。C组的宏观评分显著高于A组的ICRS评分以及A组和B组的OAS评分(P<.001,P<.000,P<.022)。结论:从本质上讲,我们的研究结果表明,当在兔模型中测试时,新开发的骨软骨支架在修复全层骨软骨缺损方面不如预期有效,添加或不添加MSC。需要进一步的研究来提高这种新型组合的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surgical outcomes of cable plate fixation in treatment of Vancouver type B1 and type C periprosthetic femoral fractures: a retrospective case series. A comprehensive review of scapulothoracic abnormal motion (STAM): evaluation, classification, and treatment strategies. Review of the treatment options and results of earthquake-related pelvic injuries after the Türkiye earthquake on 6th February. Treatment outcomes of concomitant ipsilateral neck and trochanteric fractures using Gamma3 nails with U-blade lag screws. Clinical effect of posterior-only approach debridement, intervertebral fusion, and internal fixation for upper thoracic tuberculosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1