A 5-Year Analysis of Age, Stature and Armspan in Mixed Martial Arts.

Christopher Kirk
{"title":"A 5-Year Analysis of Age, Stature and Armspan in Mixed Martial Arts.","authors":"Christopher Kirk","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2023.2252473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Athlete stature and armspan is anecdotally assumed to provide an advantage in mixed martial arts (MMA), despite an absence of supporting data. In contrast, winners of MMA bouts have been shown to be younger than bouts losers. Whilst absolute measurements of stature, armspan and armspan:stature scale (A:S) have been shown to not distinguish between winners and losers of MMA bouts, relative differences between competitors have not been analysed. This study aimed to analyse 5 years of athlete age and morphological data to replicate and expand previous studies to determine whether absolute and/or relative age and morphological variables effect winning and losing in MMA. <b>Methods</b> <b>and</b> <b>Results:</b> Bayes factor (BF>3) inferential analyses conducted on the cohort overall (n = 2,229 professional bouts), each year sampled and each individual body mass division found that only absolute (winners = 29.8 ± 4 years; losers = 30.7 ± 4.2 years) and relative age (winners = 0.82 ± 5.3 years younger than losers) differentiates between winners and losers across the whole cohort, in 4 of the 5 years, and in 4 of the 13 divisions sampled. Armspan appears to provide an advantage in heavyweight only (winners = 198.4 ± 6.6cm; losers = 196.1 ± 7.7cm), with greater A:S being a disadvantage (winners = 1.003 ± 0.022cm∙cm<sup>-1</sup>; losers = 1.010 ± 0.023 cm∙cm<sup>-1</sup>) in women's strawweight only. No variables had any effect on how bouts were won. <b>Conclusions:</b> These results confirm previous reports that the effect of athlete morphology is greatly overstated in MMA, appearing to be irrelevant in most divisions. Bout winners tend to be younger than losers, particularly in divisions displaying more diverse skill requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":94191,"journal":{"name":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2023.2252473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Athlete stature and armspan is anecdotally assumed to provide an advantage in mixed martial arts (MMA), despite an absence of supporting data. In contrast, winners of MMA bouts have been shown to be younger than bouts losers. Whilst absolute measurements of stature, armspan and armspan:stature scale (A:S) have been shown to not distinguish between winners and losers of MMA bouts, relative differences between competitors have not been analysed. This study aimed to analyse 5 years of athlete age and morphological data to replicate and expand previous studies to determine whether absolute and/or relative age and morphological variables effect winning and losing in MMA. Methods and Results: Bayes factor (BF>3) inferential analyses conducted on the cohort overall (n = 2,229 professional bouts), each year sampled and each individual body mass division found that only absolute (winners = 29.8 ± 4 years; losers = 30.7 ± 4.2 years) and relative age (winners = 0.82 ± 5.3 years younger than losers) differentiates between winners and losers across the whole cohort, in 4 of the 5 years, and in 4 of the 13 divisions sampled. Armspan appears to provide an advantage in heavyweight only (winners = 198.4 ± 6.6cm; losers = 196.1 ± 7.7cm), with greater A:S being a disadvantage (winners = 1.003 ± 0.022cm∙cm-1; losers = 1.010 ± 0.023 cm∙cm-1) in women's strawweight only. No variables had any effect on how bouts were won. Conclusions: These results confirm previous reports that the effect of athlete morphology is greatly overstated in MMA, appearing to be irrelevant in most divisions. Bout winners tend to be younger than losers, particularly in divisions displaying more diverse skill requirements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合武术中年龄、身材和臂展的5年分析。
目的:尽管缺乏支持数据,但据说运动员的身高和臂展在混合武术(MMA)中具有优势。相比之下,MMA比赛的获胜者被证明比比赛的失败者更年轻。虽然身高、臂展和臂展的绝对测量:身高量表(A:S)已被证明无法区分MMA比赛的赢家和输家,但尚未分析参赛者之间的相对差异。本研究旨在分析5年的运动员年龄和形态数据,以复制和扩展先前的研究,以确定绝对和/或相对年龄和形态变量是否影响MMA的输赢。方法和结果:对整个队列(n=2229场职业比赛)、每年抽样和每个个体体重划分进行的贝叶斯因子(BF>3)推断分析发现,在整个队列中,只有绝对(获胜者=29.8±4岁;失败者=30.7±4.2岁)和相对年龄(获胜者比失败者年轻0.82±5.3岁)区分赢家和输家,在5年中的4年中,以及在抽样的13个分区中的4个分区中。臂展似乎只在重量级比赛中占优势(获胜者=198.4±6.6厘米;失败者=196.1±7.7厘米),而在女子举重比赛中,较大的A:S是劣势(获胜者=1.003±0.022厘米∙cm-1;失败者=1.010±0.023厘米∙厘米-1)。没有任何变量对如何赢得比赛有任何影响。结论:这些结果证实了之前的报道,即MMA中运动员形态的影响被大大夸大,在大多数赛区似乎无关紧要。Bout获胜者往往比失败者年轻,尤其是在技能要求更多样化的部门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Mental Fatigue on Physical Performance and Its Relationship with Rating Perceived Effort and Enjoyment in Older Adults. Greater Excess Post-Exercise Oxygen Consumption and Fat Use Following Calisthenics vs. Oxygen Consumption Matched Steady-State Exercise. Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Adaptations to Systematically Varying Resistance Exercises. The Effect of Attention Focus Instructions on Strength and Balance in Subjects With Generalized Joint Hypermobility. Neural and Muscular Determinants of Performance Fatigability Are Independent of Work and Recovery Durations During High-Intensity Interval Exercise in Males.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1