Masking Ability of Monolithic CAD/CAM Laminate Veneers Over Different Resin Cement Shades and Substrate Colors.

Nazmiye Sen, Bulent Sermet
{"title":"Masking Ability of Monolithic CAD/CAM Laminate Veneers Over Different Resin Cement Shades and Substrate Colors.","authors":"Nazmiye Sen, Bulent Sermet","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the masking ability of monolithic CAD/CAM veneers placed over different resin cement shades and substrate colors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Veneers were milled from four different monolithic CAD/CAM restorative materials: feldspathic ceramic (VMII), lithium disilicate ceramic (Emax CAD), zirconiareinforced lithium silicate ceramic (VS), and high-translucency zirconia ceramic (YZ-XT). Veneers were luted on natural tooth-colored (ND1) or discolored substrates (ND3 or ND5) using two different resin cement shades (opaque white or translucent). Each CAD/CAM material, resin cement shade, and substrate combination comprised 9 sample veneers (N &#61; 216). Color parameters were obtained using a dental spectrophotometer before and after luting. Color differences (ΔE00) were calculated using CIEDE2000 formula and compared to perceptibility (P &#61; .81 ΔE00 units) and acceptability (AT &#61; 1.77 ΔE00 units) visual thresholds. Color variation data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni-Holm correction (α &#61; .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest ΔE00 value was obtained in the VMII group placed over a discolored substrate, followed by the Emax CAD, YZ-XT, and VS groups. The effect of material types on ΔE00 values was significantly observed when the veneers were luted on discolored substrates using translucent resin cement (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Restorative material type, substrate color, and resin cement shade affect the masking ability of monolithic CAD/CAM laminate veneers.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"540-546"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the masking ability of monolithic CAD/CAM veneers placed over different resin cement shades and substrate colors.

Materials and methods: Veneers were milled from four different monolithic CAD/CAM restorative materials: feldspathic ceramic (VMII), lithium disilicate ceramic (Emax CAD), zirconiareinforced lithium silicate ceramic (VS), and high-translucency zirconia ceramic (YZ-XT). Veneers were luted on natural tooth-colored (ND1) or discolored substrates (ND3 or ND5) using two different resin cement shades (opaque white or translucent). Each CAD/CAM material, resin cement shade, and substrate combination comprised 9 sample veneers (N = 216). Color parameters were obtained using a dental spectrophotometer before and after luting. Color differences (ΔE00) were calculated using CIEDE2000 formula and compared to perceptibility (P = .81 ΔE00 units) and acceptability (AT = 1.77 ΔE00 units) visual thresholds. Color variation data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni-Holm correction (α = .05).

Results: The highest ΔE00 value was obtained in the VMII group placed over a discolored substrate, followed by the Emax CAD, YZ-XT, and VS groups. The effect of material types on ΔE00 values was significantly observed when the veneers were luted on discolored substrates using translucent resin cement (P < .05).

Conclusions: Restorative material type, substrate color, and resin cement shade affect the masking ability of monolithic CAD/CAM laminate veneers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单片CAD-CAM层压板在不同树脂水泥色调和基底颜色上的遮蔽能力。
目的:比较不同树脂水泥色调和基底颜色的单片CAD-CAM贴面的遮蔽能力。材料和方法:用四种不同的单片CAD-CAM修复材料对单板进行研磨:长石陶瓷(VMII)、二硅酸锂陶瓷(Emax-CAD)、氧化锆增强硅酸钙陶瓷(VS)和高透光性氧化锆陶瓷(YZ-XT)。使用两种不同的树脂水泥色调(白色不透明或半透明)在天然牙齿着色(ND1)或变色基底(ND3或ND5)上对单板(n=9)进行稀释。在洗脱之前和之后使用牙科分光光度计获得颜色参数。使用CIEDE2000公式计算色差(ΔE00),并将其与可感知性(P=0.81ΔE00单位)和可接受性(AT=1.77ΔE00单元)视觉阈值进行比较。使用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U检验和Bonferroni-Holm校正(α=0.05)对颜色变化数据进行统计分析。结果:放置在变色基底上的VMII组获得的ΔE00值最高,其次是Emax-CAD、YZ-XT和VS组。当单板使用半透明树脂水泥在变色基底上稀释时,材料类型对ΔE00值的影响显著(结论:修复材料类型、基底颜色和树脂水泥阴影影响单片CAD-CAM单板的掩蔽能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Level of Evidence and Research Directions in Digital Complete Dentures: A Metrics-Based Perspective. Micro-Computed Tomography Evaluation of Partial Indirect Adhesive Restorations: A Proof-Of-Concept Study on the Effect of Preparations and Traditional or Additive Cam Workflow. Retention, Stability, and Accuracy Of 3D Printed Reduction Guides for Removable Partial Dentures. Perceived Influence of Social Media Among Specialist Dentists: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study. Sleep, Awake, or Combined Sleep/Awake Bruxism Against Temporomandibular Joint and/or Temporal Pain, Depression, Anxiety, Stress, and Sleep Quality: The Brigada Militar Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1