Masking Ability of Monolithic CAD/CAM Laminate Veneers Over Different Resin Cement Shades and Substrate Colors.

Nazmiye Sen, Bulent Sermet
{"title":"Masking Ability of Monolithic CAD/CAM Laminate Veneers Over Different Resin Cement Shades and Substrate Colors.","authors":"Nazmiye Sen, Bulent Sermet","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the masking ability of monolithic CAD/CAM veneers placed over different resin cement shades and substrate colors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Veneers were milled from four different monolithic CAD/CAM restorative materials: feldspathic ceramic (VMII), lithium disilicate ceramic (Emax CAD), zirconiareinforced lithium silicate ceramic (VS), and high-translucency zirconia ceramic (YZ-XT). Veneers were luted on natural tooth-colored (ND1) or discolored substrates (ND3 or ND5) using two different resin cement shades (opaque white or translucent). Each CAD/CAM material, resin cement shade, and substrate combination comprised 9 sample veneers (N &#61; 216). Color parameters were obtained using a dental spectrophotometer before and after luting. Color differences (ΔE00) were calculated using CIEDE2000 formula and compared to perceptibility (P &#61; .81 ΔE00 units) and acceptability (AT &#61; 1.77 ΔE00 units) visual thresholds. Color variation data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni-Holm correction (α &#61; .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest ΔE00 value was obtained in the VMII group placed over a discolored substrate, followed by the Emax CAD, YZ-XT, and VS groups. The effect of material types on ΔE00 values was significantly observed when the veneers were luted on discolored substrates using translucent resin cement (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Restorative material type, substrate color, and resin cement shade affect the masking ability of monolithic CAD/CAM laminate veneers.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the masking ability of monolithic CAD/CAM veneers placed over different resin cement shades and substrate colors.

Materials and methods: Veneers were milled from four different monolithic CAD/CAM restorative materials: feldspathic ceramic (VMII), lithium disilicate ceramic (Emax CAD), zirconiareinforced lithium silicate ceramic (VS), and high-translucency zirconia ceramic (YZ-XT). Veneers were luted on natural tooth-colored (ND1) or discolored substrates (ND3 or ND5) using two different resin cement shades (opaque white or translucent). Each CAD/CAM material, resin cement shade, and substrate combination comprised 9 sample veneers (N = 216). Color parameters were obtained using a dental spectrophotometer before and after luting. Color differences (ΔE00) were calculated using CIEDE2000 formula and compared to perceptibility (P = .81 ΔE00 units) and acceptability (AT = 1.77 ΔE00 units) visual thresholds. Color variation data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni-Holm correction (α = .05).

Results: The highest ΔE00 value was obtained in the VMII group placed over a discolored substrate, followed by the Emax CAD, YZ-XT, and VS groups. The effect of material types on ΔE00 values was significantly observed when the veneers were luted on discolored substrates using translucent resin cement (P < .05).

Conclusions: Restorative material type, substrate color, and resin cement shade affect the masking ability of monolithic CAD/CAM laminate veneers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单片CAD-CAM层压板在不同树脂水泥色调和基底颜色上的遮蔽能力。
目的:比较不同树脂水泥色调和基底颜色的单片CAD-CAM贴面的遮蔽能力。材料和方法:用四种不同的单片CAD-CAM修复材料对单板进行研磨:长石陶瓷(VMII)、二硅酸锂陶瓷(Emax-CAD)、氧化锆增强硅酸钙陶瓷(VS)和高透光性氧化锆陶瓷(YZ-XT)。使用两种不同的树脂水泥色调(白色不透明或半透明)在天然牙齿着色(ND1)或变色基底(ND3或ND5)上对单板(n=9)进行稀释。在洗脱之前和之后使用牙科分光光度计获得颜色参数。使用CIEDE2000公式计算色差(ΔE00),并将其与可感知性(P=0.81ΔE00单位)和可接受性(AT=1.77ΔE00单元)视觉阈值进行比较。使用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U检验和Bonferroni-Holm校正(α=0.05)对颜色变化数据进行统计分析。结果:放置在变色基底上的VMII组获得的ΔE00值最高,其次是Emax-CAD、YZ-XT和VS组。当单板使用半透明树脂水泥在变色基底上稀释时,材料类型对ΔE00值的影响显著(结论:修复材料类型、基底颜色和树脂水泥阴影影响单片CAD-CAM单板的掩蔽能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IN VITRO SURVIVAL AND FRACTURE FORCE OF LITHIUM DISILICATE HYBRID ABUTMENT CROWNS. Influence of Implant ScanBody Material and Intraoral Scanners on the Accuracy of Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impressions. A Cross-Sectional Study of Temporomandibular Disorders Among Postgraduate Students. Translucency Parameters and Masking Abilities of Monolithic CAD/CAM Ceramics. A Comparison of Occlusal Schemes with Condylar Inclination and Anterior Guidance in Dentate Individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1