Comparative assessment of quality of life of patients with schizophrenia attending a community psychiatric centre and a psychiatric hospital.

Victoria I Elegbede, Adetunji Obadeji, Timothy O Adebowale, Lateef O Oluwole
{"title":"Comparative assessment of quality of life of patients with schizophrenia attending a community psychiatric centre and a psychiatric hospital.","authors":"Victoria I Elegbede, Adetunji Obadeji, Timothy O Adebowale, Lateef O Oluwole","doi":"10.4314/gmj.v53i2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the past few decades, there has been an emphasis on the de-institutionalisation of psychiatric care with a focus on community care. With Quality of Life (QoL) as an outcome measure, this study compared the QoL of patients with schizophrenia attending a psychiatric hospital and a community psychiatric centre.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study in two psychiatric facilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained through a socio-demographic and clinical questionnaire; the QoL was assessed with the WHOQOL-BREF and patient satisfaction with care with CPOSS. Total and domain scores of WHOQOL-BREF for each group were calculated and compared with each other and other group characteristics. Diagnosis of schizophrenia was based on ICD-10.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants from the two centres did not differ significantly on any of the socio-demographic characteristics measured. Similarly, there was no significant difference in their overall mean WHOQOL-BREF scores as well as the mean WHOQOL-BREF of domain scores. However, the married and females from both centres significantly had higher mean WHOQOL-BREF scores than their male counterparts. Patients in remission for more than two years or those on a single type of medication (either oral or depot preparation) from both centres significantly had higher mean WHOQOL-BREF score compared with those who had less than two years of remission or on both oral and depot preparations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall QoL of patients managed at the two centres was comparable, with similar socio-demographic as well as clinical variables influencing QoL. This suggests that patients with schizophrenia can be well managed at community psychiatric centres.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None declared.</p>","PeriodicalId":94319,"journal":{"name":"Ghana medical journal","volume":"53 2","pages":"92-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6697764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ghana medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gmj.v53i2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over the past few decades, there has been an emphasis on the de-institutionalisation of psychiatric care with a focus on community care. With Quality of Life (QoL) as an outcome measure, this study compared the QoL of patients with schizophrenia attending a psychiatric hospital and a community psychiatric centre.

Design: This was a cross-sectional study in two psychiatric facilities.

Methods: Data were obtained through a socio-demographic and clinical questionnaire; the QoL was assessed with the WHOQOL-BREF and patient satisfaction with care with CPOSS. Total and domain scores of WHOQOL-BREF for each group were calculated and compared with each other and other group characteristics. Diagnosis of schizophrenia was based on ICD-10.

Results: Participants from the two centres did not differ significantly on any of the socio-demographic characteristics measured. Similarly, there was no significant difference in their overall mean WHOQOL-BREF scores as well as the mean WHOQOL-BREF of domain scores. However, the married and females from both centres significantly had higher mean WHOQOL-BREF scores than their male counterparts. Patients in remission for more than two years or those on a single type of medication (either oral or depot preparation) from both centres significantly had higher mean WHOQOL-BREF score compared with those who had less than two years of remission or on both oral and depot preparations.

Conclusion: Overall QoL of patients managed at the two centres was comparable, with similar socio-demographic as well as clinical variables influencing QoL. This suggests that patients with schizophrenia can be well managed at community psychiatric centres.

Funding: None declared.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区精神病中心和精神病院精神分裂症患者生活质量的比较评估。
背景:在过去的几十年里,人们一直强调精神病护理的去机构化,重点是社区护理。本研究以生活质量(QoL)为结果衡量标准,比较了精神病院和社区精神病院精神分裂症患者的生活质量。设计:这是一项在两个精神病院进行的横断面研究。方法:通过社会人口学和临床问卷获得数据;用WHOQOL-BREF评估生活质量,并用CPOSS评估患者对护理的满意度。计算各组的WHOQOL-BREF总分和领域得分,并将其与其他组特征进行比较。精神分裂症的诊断基于ICD-10。结果:来自两个中心的参与者在测量的任何社会人口学特征上都没有显著差异。同样,他们的总体平均WHOQOL-BREF得分以及领域得分的平均WHOQOL-BREF没有显著差异。然而,来自这两个中心的已婚和女性的WHOQOL-BREF平均得分明显高于男性。与病情缓解期不到两年或同时服用口服和储备制剂的患者相比,两个中心的病情缓解期超过两年或服用单一药物(口服或储备制剂)的患者的平均WHOQOL-BREF评分显著更高。结论:两个中心管理的患者的总体生活质量具有可比性,影响生活质量的社会人口学和临床变量相似。这表明精神分裂症患者可以在社区精神病中心得到很好的管理。资金:未申报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Addressing the roadblocks to hypertension management in Ghana: proceedings of a roundtable discussion. Antibiotic use in surgical infections at a tertiary teaching hospital in Ghana. Comparative analysis of clinical profile, laboratory profile and outcome in COVID-19 patients with and without hypothyroidism. Equity of access to free maternal and child health services among reproductive-age women in Delta State, Nigeria. Management and associated outcomes of COVID-19 infection among Ghanaian autoimmune rheumatic disease patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1