Quantifying Bone Strength Deficits in Young Adults Born Extremely Preterm or Extremely Low Birth Weight

IF 5.1 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.1002/jbmr.4926
Thang Dao, Dale Lee Robinson, Lex W Doyle, Peter VS Lee, Joy Olsen, Ashwini Kale, Jeanie LY Cheong, John D Wark
{"title":"Quantifying Bone Strength Deficits in Young Adults Born Extremely Preterm or Extremely Low Birth Weight","authors":"Thang Dao,&nbsp;Dale Lee Robinson,&nbsp;Lex W Doyle,&nbsp;Peter VS Lee,&nbsp;Joy Olsen,&nbsp;Ashwini Kale,&nbsp;Jeanie LY Cheong,&nbsp;John D Wark","doi":"10.1002/jbmr.4926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The long-term bone health of young adults born extremely preterm (EP; &lt;28 weeks' gestation) or extremely low birth weight (ELBW; &lt;1000 g birth weight) in the post-surfactant era (since the early 1990s) is unclear. This study investigated their bone structure and estimated bone strength using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT)-based finite element modeling (pQCT-FEM). Results using this technique have been associated with bone fragility in several clinical settings. Participants comprised 161 EP/ELBW survivors (46.0% male) and 122 contemporaneous term-born (44.3% male), normal birth weight controls born in Victoria, Australia, during 1991–1992. At age 25 years, participants underwent pQCT at 4% and 66% of tibia and radius length, which was analyzed using pQCT-FEM. Groups were compared using linear regression and adjusted for height and weight. An interaction term between group and sex was added to assess group differences between sexes. Parameters measured included compressive stiffness (<i>k</i><sub><i>comp</i></sub>), torsional stiffness (<i>k</i><sub><i>torsion</i></sub>), and bending stiffness (<i>k</i><sub><i>bend</i></sub>). EP/ELBW survivors were shorter than the controls, but their weights were similar. Several unadjusted tibial pQCT-FEM parameters were lower in the EP/ELBW group. Height- and weight-adjusted <i>k</i><sub><i>torsion</i></sub> at 66% tibia remained lower in EP/ELBW (mean difference [95% confidence interval] −180 [−352, −8] Nm/deg). The evidence for group differences in <i>k</i><sub><i>torsion</i></sub> and <i>k</i><sub><i>bend</i></sub> at 66% tibia was stronger among males than females (<i>p</i><sub>interactions</sub> &lt;0.05). There was little evidence for group differences in adjusted radial models. Lower height- and weight-adjusted pQCT-FEM measures in EP/ELBW compared with controls suggest a clinically relevant increase in predicted long-term fracture risk in EP/ELBW survivors, particularly males. Future pQCT-FEM studies should utilize the tibial pQCT images because of the greater variability in the radius possibly related to lower measurement precision. © 2023 The Authors. <i>Journal of Bone and Mineral Research</i> published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).</p>","PeriodicalId":185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","volume":"38 12","pages":"1800-1808"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbmr.4926","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbmr.4926","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The long-term bone health of young adults born extremely preterm (EP; <28 weeks' gestation) or extremely low birth weight (ELBW; <1000 g birth weight) in the post-surfactant era (since the early 1990s) is unclear. This study investigated their bone structure and estimated bone strength using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT)-based finite element modeling (pQCT-FEM). Results using this technique have been associated with bone fragility in several clinical settings. Participants comprised 161 EP/ELBW survivors (46.0% male) and 122 contemporaneous term-born (44.3% male), normal birth weight controls born in Victoria, Australia, during 1991–1992. At age 25 years, participants underwent pQCT at 4% and 66% of tibia and radius length, which was analyzed using pQCT-FEM. Groups were compared using linear regression and adjusted for height and weight. An interaction term between group and sex was added to assess group differences between sexes. Parameters measured included compressive stiffness (kcomp), torsional stiffness (ktorsion), and bending stiffness (kbend). EP/ELBW survivors were shorter than the controls, but their weights were similar. Several unadjusted tibial pQCT-FEM parameters were lower in the EP/ELBW group. Height- and weight-adjusted ktorsion at 66% tibia remained lower in EP/ELBW (mean difference [95% confidence interval] −180 [−352, −8] Nm/deg). The evidence for group differences in ktorsion and kbend at 66% tibia was stronger among males than females (pinteractions <0.05). There was little evidence for group differences in adjusted radial models. Lower height- and weight-adjusted pQCT-FEM measures in EP/ELBW compared with controls suggest a clinically relevant increase in predicted long-term fracture risk in EP/ELBW survivors, particularly males. Future pQCT-FEM studies should utilize the tibial pQCT images because of the greater variability in the radius possibly related to lower measurement precision. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化极早产或极低出生体重的年轻人的骨强度缺陷。
极早产儿的长期骨骼健康(EP;comp)、扭转刚度(ktorsion)和弯曲刚度(kbend)。EP/ELBW幸存者比对照组矮,而他们的体重相似。EP/ELBW组的几个未调整的胫骨pQCT FEM参数较低。在EP/ELBW中,胫骨66%处的身高和体重调整后的ktorsion仍然较低(平均差异(95%置信区间)-180(-352,-8)Nm/deg)。在66%的胫骨上,男性的胫骨前伸和后伸存在群体差异的证据比女性更强(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
257
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (JBMR) publishes highly impactful original manuscripts, reviews, and special articles on basic, translational and clinical investigations relevant to the musculoskeletal system and mineral metabolism. Specifically, the journal is interested in original research on the biology and physiology of skeletal tissues, interdisciplinary research spanning the musculoskeletal and other systems, including but not limited to immunology, hematology, energy metabolism, cancer biology, and neurology, and systems biology topics using large scale “-omics” approaches. The journal welcomes clinical research on the pathophysiology, treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and fractures, as well as sarcopenia, disorders of bone and mineral metabolism, and rare or genetically determined bone diseases.
期刊最新文献
Long-duration type 1 diabetes is associated with deficient cortical bone mechanical behavior and altered matrix composition in human femoral bone. One day at a time: understanding how 24-hour physical activity, sedentary behavior and sleep patterns influence falls and fracture risk. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of probiotics on bone outcomes in rodent models. Vertebral fracture prevalence and risk factors for fracture in the Gambia, West Africa: the Gambian bone and muscle ageing study. Modeling of Skeletal Development and Diseases Using Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1