Methods for determining clinical utility

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical biochemistry Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.110674
Francis Bowling , Tony Badrick
{"title":"Methods for determining clinical utility","authors":"Francis Bowling ,&nbsp;Tony Badrick","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.110674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Measuring the clinical utility of a diagnostic test involves evaluating its impact on patient outcomes, clinical decision-making, and healthcare resource utilization. Determining clinical utility requires accessing patient medical history and outcomes data. These studies involve enrolling patients undergoing diagnostic tests and tracking their clinical outcomes. Researchers can determine the test's clinical utility by comparing the outcomes of patients who receive the diagnostic test to those who do not. These outcomes include benefits and harm. The highest level of evidence to support clinical utility determinations may be obtained from clinical trials. However, clinical laboratories are often not involved in clinical trials, and laboratory specialists may not be experienced in conducting such trials. Many established laboratory tests have never had clinical utility determined. Prospective studies assessing a diagnostic test's impact on clinical outcomes may require long-term patient monitoring, which is problematic.</p><p>This paper presents methods that may be used to assess clinical utility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10172,"journal":{"name":"Clinical biochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912023002023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measuring the clinical utility of a diagnostic test involves evaluating its impact on patient outcomes, clinical decision-making, and healthcare resource utilization. Determining clinical utility requires accessing patient medical history and outcomes data. These studies involve enrolling patients undergoing diagnostic tests and tracking their clinical outcomes. Researchers can determine the test's clinical utility by comparing the outcomes of patients who receive the diagnostic test to those who do not. These outcomes include benefits and harm. The highest level of evidence to support clinical utility determinations may be obtained from clinical trials. However, clinical laboratories are often not involved in clinical trials, and laboratory specialists may not be experienced in conducting such trials. Many established laboratory tests have never had clinical utility determined. Prospective studies assessing a diagnostic test's impact on clinical outcomes may require long-term patient monitoring, which is problematic.

This paper presents methods that may be used to assess clinical utility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定临床效用的方法。
衡量诊断测试的临床效用包括评估其对患者结果、临床决策和医疗资源利用率的影响。确定临床效用需要访问患者的病史和结果数据。这些研究包括招募接受诊断测试的患者并跟踪他们的临床结果。研究人员可以通过比较接受诊断测试的患者和未接受诊断测试患者的结果来确定该测试的临床效用。这些结果包括好处和坏处。支持临床效用测定的最高水平的证据可以从临床试验中获得。然而,临床实验室通常不参与临床试验,实验室专家可能没有进行此类试验的经验。许多已建立的实验室测试从未确定其临床效用。评估诊断测试对临床结果影响的前瞻性研究可能需要长期的患者监测,这是有问题的。本文介绍了可用于评估临床效用的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical biochemistry
Clinical biochemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Biochemistry publishes articles relating to clinical chemistry, molecular biology and genetics, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory immunology and laboratory medicine in general, with the focus on analytical and clinical investigation of laboratory tests in humans used for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapy, and monitoring of disease.
期刊最新文献
Deteriorated thiol-disulphide and oxidized-reduced glutathione status in blood in Alzheimer’s disease Editorial Board In vivo and in vitro relationship between ionized magnesium and ionized calcium Heart failure biomarkers and prediction of early left ventricle remodeling after acute coronary syndromes Serum glucose mediated association of serum lactate with acute kidney injury among AIS patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1