Salvage of failed direct lateral sacroiliac joint fixation using a new percutaneous lateral-oblique transfixation technique with two variable-threaded screws: a multicenter case report of three cases.

Q1 Medicine Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.21037/jss-23-43
Kingsley R Chin, Richard R Francis, William M Costigan, Erik Spayde, Chidubem Ike, Yujin Jeong, Deepak K Pandey, Jason A Seale
{"title":"Salvage of failed direct lateral sacroiliac joint fixation using a new percutaneous lateral-oblique transfixation technique with two variable-threaded screws: a multicenter case report of three cases.","authors":"Kingsley R Chin,&nbsp;Richard R Francis,&nbsp;William M Costigan,&nbsp;Erik Spayde,&nbsp;Chidubem Ike,&nbsp;Yujin Jeong,&nbsp;Deepak K Pandey,&nbsp;Jason A Seale","doi":"10.21037/jss-23-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The direct lateral trans-gluteal muscle splitting transiliac approach was popularized to fixate the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) using three cannulated triangular titanium implants (TTIs) wedges. Publications support efficacy of the direct lateral approach but a paucity of literature to help surgeons revise these implants when they fail. Intuitively the implants can be removed but require an open incision and dissection through the gluteal muscles and scar tissue which can lead to muscle and neurovascular injuries. Our objective was to evaluate the clinical outcome, measured by patient-reported Visual Analog Score (VAS), of three patients who had failed direct lateral SIJ fusions each using three implants and describe a revision technique using a new percutaneous lateral-oblique transfixation technique with two variable-threaded screws while preserving the original implants.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>Two separate orthopedic spine surgeons at different hospitals performed the technique using two SacroFuse<sup>®</sup> screws for SIJ revision fusion in three patients who had clinical symptoms and radiographic findings of SIJ pseudoarthrosis after direct lateral approach. One 61 years old male patient had a previous surgery with three lateral threaded screw implants. Two females with ages 47 and 40 years old had three TTI wedges. Follow-up from 10 to 26 months. Patients discharged home the same day. Mean procedure time of 20 minutes with blood loss less than five cc. Incision size was approximately 1 inch. Each patient had a 12 mm × 60 mm and a 12 mm × 50 mm screw filled with NanoFuse Biologics synthetic bioactive glass and demineralized bone matrix. Prior implants were left in place. There was an 89% decrease in mean VAS score of 9.5 to 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is a clinically valuable report because until now there was no reconstructive surgery to revise direct lateral implants other than removal with potential neurovascular risks. This is the first article to demonstrate a lateral-oblique transfixation technique with two variable-threaded screws for successful salvage of SIJ pseudoarthrosis after direct lateral fixation without implant removal. The Sacrix technique achieved immediate stability and long-term fusion documented on computed tomography (CT) scan as early as 6 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"9 3","pages":"348-356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/74/29/jss-09-03-348.PMC10570639.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-23-43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The direct lateral trans-gluteal muscle splitting transiliac approach was popularized to fixate the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) using three cannulated triangular titanium implants (TTIs) wedges. Publications support efficacy of the direct lateral approach but a paucity of literature to help surgeons revise these implants when they fail. Intuitively the implants can be removed but require an open incision and dissection through the gluteal muscles and scar tissue which can lead to muscle and neurovascular injuries. Our objective was to evaluate the clinical outcome, measured by patient-reported Visual Analog Score (VAS), of three patients who had failed direct lateral SIJ fusions each using three implants and describe a revision technique using a new percutaneous lateral-oblique transfixation technique with two variable-threaded screws while preserving the original implants.

Case description: Two separate orthopedic spine surgeons at different hospitals performed the technique using two SacroFuse® screws for SIJ revision fusion in three patients who had clinical symptoms and radiographic findings of SIJ pseudoarthrosis after direct lateral approach. One 61 years old male patient had a previous surgery with three lateral threaded screw implants. Two females with ages 47 and 40 years old had three TTI wedges. Follow-up from 10 to 26 months. Patients discharged home the same day. Mean procedure time of 20 minutes with blood loss less than five cc. Incision size was approximately 1 inch. Each patient had a 12 mm × 60 mm and a 12 mm × 50 mm screw filled with NanoFuse Biologics synthetic bioactive glass and demineralized bone matrix. Prior implants were left in place. There was an 89% decrease in mean VAS score of 9.5 to 1.

Conclusions: This is a clinically valuable report because until now there was no reconstructive surgery to revise direct lateral implants other than removal with potential neurovascular risks. This is the first article to demonstrate a lateral-oblique transfixation technique with two variable-threaded screws for successful salvage of SIJ pseudoarthrosis after direct lateral fixation without implant removal. The Sacrix technique achieved immediate stability and long-term fusion documented on computed tomography (CT) scan as early as 6 months.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用一种新的经皮外侧斜置两颗可变螺纹螺钉固定骶髂关节直接内固定失败:一例多中心病例报告,共3例。
背景:采用三个带套管的三角形钛植入物(TTI)楔,采用经臀肌外侧直接劈裂经髂内入路固定骶髂关节(SIJ)。出版物支持直接侧向入路的有效性,但缺乏文献帮助外科医生在植入失败时对其进行修正。直观地说,植入物可以移除,但需要切开并解剖臀肌和疤痕组织,这可能导致肌肉和神经血管损伤。我们的目的是通过患者报告的视觉模拟评分(VAS)来评估三名患者的临床结果,这三名患者分别使用三个植入物进行了直接外侧SIJ融合失败,并描述了一种在保留原始植入物的同时使用两个可变螺纹螺钉的新型经皮外侧倾斜穿刺技术的翻修技术。病例描述:不同医院的两名骨科医生使用两颗SacroFuse®螺钉对三名患者进行了SIJ翻修融合术,这些患者在直接外侧入路后出现了SIJ假关节病的临床症状和放射学表现。一名61岁的男性患者曾接受过三次侧螺纹螺钉植入手术。两名年龄分别为47岁和40岁的女性有三个TTI楔。随访10至26个月。病人当天出院回家。平均手术时间为20分钟,出血量小于5毫升。切口尺寸约为1英寸。每个患者都有一个12 mm×60 mm和一个12毫米×50 mm的螺钉,螺钉内填充NanoFuse Biologics合成生物活性玻璃和软化骨基质。之前的植入物留在原位。平均VAS评分从9.5分下降到1分,下降了89%。结论:这是一份有临床价值的报告,因为到目前为止,除了有潜在神经血管风险的移除外,还没有任何重建手术来修正直接侧移植物。这是第一篇证明使用两个可变螺纹螺钉的侧向倾斜穿刺技术在不移除植入物的情况下直接侧向固定后成功挽救SIJ假关节病的文章。早在6个月前,计算机断层扫描(CT)就记录了Sacrix技术实现了即时稳定和长期融合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Non-instrumented management of traumatic atlanto-axial rotatory subluxation: surgical technique. A case series in vertebral body tethering results in improvement in coronal Cobb angle but deterioration in axial rotation: a 3-dimensional analysis. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: patient selection and workup. Osseointegration and fixation opportunities of sacroiliac instrumentation: a preclinical evaluation in a large animal model. Artificial intelligence in spine care: a paradigm shift in diagnosis, surgery, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1