Enhancing or impeding? The influence of digital systems on interprofessional practice and person-centred care in nutrition care systems across rehabilitation units.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition & Dietetics Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.1111/1747-0080.12846
Hannah T Olufson, Ella Ottrey, Theresa L Green, Adrienne M Young
{"title":"Enhancing or impeding? The influence of digital systems on interprofessional practice and person-centred care in nutrition care systems across rehabilitation units.","authors":"Hannah T Olufson,&nbsp;Ella Ottrey,&nbsp;Theresa L Green,&nbsp;Adrienne M Young","doi":"10.1111/1747-0080.12846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Digital health transformation may enhance or impede person-centred care and interprofessional practice, and thus the provision of high-quality rehabilitation and nutrition services. We aimed to understand how different elements and factors within existing digital nutrition and health systems in subacute rehabilitation units influence person-centred and/or interprofessional nutrition and mealtime care practices through the lens of complexity science.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our ethnographic study was completed through an interpretivist paradigm. Data were collected from observation and interviews with patients, support persons and staff. Overall, 58 h of ethnographic field work led to observing 125 participants and interviewing 77 participants, totalling 165 unique participants. We used reflexive thematic analysis to analyse the data with consideration of complexity science.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We developed four themes: (1) the interplay of local context and technology use in nutrition care systems; (2) digitalisation affects staff participation in nutrition and mealtime care; (3) embracing technology to support nutrition and food service flexibility; and (4) the (in)visibility of digitally enabled nutrition care systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While digital systems enhance the visibility and flexibility of nutrition care systems in some instances, they may also reduce the ability to customise nutrition and mealtime care and lead to siloing of nutrition-related activities. Our findings highlight that the introduction of digital systems alone may be insufficient to enable interprofessional practice and person-centred care within nutrition and mealtime care and thus should be accompanied by local processes and workflows to maximise digital potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":19368,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12846","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Digital health transformation may enhance or impede person-centred care and interprofessional practice, and thus the provision of high-quality rehabilitation and nutrition services. We aimed to understand how different elements and factors within existing digital nutrition and health systems in subacute rehabilitation units influence person-centred and/or interprofessional nutrition and mealtime care practices through the lens of complexity science.

Methods: Our ethnographic study was completed through an interpretivist paradigm. Data were collected from observation and interviews with patients, support persons and staff. Overall, 58 h of ethnographic field work led to observing 125 participants and interviewing 77 participants, totalling 165 unique participants. We used reflexive thematic analysis to analyse the data with consideration of complexity science.

Results: We developed four themes: (1) the interplay of local context and technology use in nutrition care systems; (2) digitalisation affects staff participation in nutrition and mealtime care; (3) embracing technology to support nutrition and food service flexibility; and (4) the (in)visibility of digitally enabled nutrition care systems.

Conclusions: While digital systems enhance the visibility and flexibility of nutrition care systems in some instances, they may also reduce the ability to customise nutrition and mealtime care and lead to siloing of nutrition-related activities. Our findings highlight that the introduction of digital systems alone may be insufficient to enable interprofessional practice and person-centred care within nutrition and mealtime care and thus should be accompanied by local processes and workflows to maximise digital potential.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增强还是阻碍?数字系统对康复单位营养护理系统中跨专业实践和以人为中心的护理的影响。
目标:数字化健康转型可能会加强或阻碍以人为中心的护理和跨专业实践,从而提供高质量的康复和营养服务。我们旨在通过复杂性科学的视角,了解亚急性康复单位现有数字营养和健康系统中的不同元素和因素如何影响以人为中心和/或跨专业的营养和用餐护理实践。方法:我们的民族志研究是通过解释主义范式完成的。数据来自对患者、支持人员和工作人员的观察和访谈。总体而言,58 h的民族志实地工作导致观察了125名参与者,采访了77名参与者,共有165名独特的参与者。我们采用自反主题分析法,结合复杂性科学对数据进行分析。结果:我们提出了四个主题:(1)营养护理系统中当地环境和技术使用的相互作用;(2) 数字化影响员工参与营养和用餐护理;(3) 采用技术支持营养和食品服务的灵活性;以及(4)数字化营养护理系统的可视性。结论:虽然数字系统在某些情况下提高了营养护理系统的可见性和灵活性,但它们也可能降低定制营养和用餐时间护理的能力,并导致营养相关活动的孤立。我们的研究结果强调,仅引入数字系统可能不足以在营养和用餐时间护理中实现跨专业实践和以人为中心的护理,因此应结合当地流程和工作流程,以最大限度地发挥数字潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition & Dietetics
Nutrition & Dietetics 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Dietetics is the official journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. Covering all aspects of food, nutrition and dietetics, the Journal provides a forum for the reporting, discussion and development of scientifically credible knowledge related to human nutrition and dietetics. Widely respected in Australia and around the world, Nutrition & Dietetics publishes original research, methodology analyses, research reviews and much more. The Journal aims to keep health professionals abreast of current knowledge on human nutrition and diet, and accepts contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
How do plant-based milks compare to cow's milk nutritionally? An audit of the plant-based milk products available in Australia. Food intake in an Australian Aboriginal rural community facing food and water security challenges: A cross-sectional survey. The test-retest reliability and validity of food photography and food diary analyses. What have equity and human rights got to do with dietetics? Foodservice strategies for reducing athlete illness at the Olympic and Paralympic Games.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1