biomArker-guided Duration of Antibiotic treatment in hospitalised Patients with suspecTed Sepsis (ADAPT-Sepsis): A protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of the Intensive Care Society Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-25 DOI:10.1177/17511437231169193
Paul Dark, Gavin D Perkins, Ronan McMullan, Danny McAuley, Anthony C Gordon, Jonathan Clayton, Dipesh Mistry, Keith Young, Scott Regan, Nicola McGowan, Matt Stevenson, Simon Gates, Gordon L Carlson, Tim Walsh, Nazir I Lone, Paul R Mouncey, Mervyn Singer, Peter Wilson, Tim Felton, Kay Marshall, Anower M Hossain, Ranjit Lall
{"title":"biomArker-guided Duration of Antibiotic treatment in hospitalised Patients with suspecTed Sepsis (ADAPT-Sepsis): A protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Paul Dark, Gavin D Perkins, Ronan McMullan, Danny McAuley, Anthony C Gordon, Jonathan Clayton, Dipesh Mistry, Keith Young, Scott Regan, Nicola McGowan, Matt Stevenson, Simon Gates, Gordon L Carlson, Tim Walsh, Nazir I Lone, Paul R Mouncey, Mervyn Singer, Peter Wilson, Tim Felton, Kay Marshall, Anower M Hossain, Ranjit Lall","doi":"10.1177/17511437231169193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe the protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to determine whether treatment protocols monitoring daily CRP (C-reactive protein) or PCT (procalcitonin) safely allow a reduction in duration of antibiotic therapy in hospitalised adult patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicentre three-arm randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>UK NHS hospitals.</p><p><strong>Target population: </strong>Hospitalised critically ill adults who have been commenced on intravenous antibiotics for sepsis.</p><p><strong>Health technology: </strong>Three protocols for guiding antibiotic discontinuation will be compared: (a) standard care; (b) standard care + daily CRP monitoring; (c) standard care + daily PCT monitoring. Standard care will be based on routine sepsis management and antibiotic stewardship. Measurement of outcomes and costs. Outcomes will be assessed to 28 days. The primary outcomes are total duration of antibiotics and safety outcome of all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes include: escalation of care/re-admission; infection re-lapse/recurrence; antibiotic dose; length and level of critical care stay and length of hospital stay. Ninety-day all-cause mortality rates will also be collected. An assessment of cost effectiveness will be performed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the setting of routine NHS care, if this trial finds that a treatment protocol based on monitoring CRP or PCT safely allows a reduction in duration of antibiotic therapy, and is cost effective, then this has the potential to change clinical practice for critically ill patients with sepsis. Moreover, if a biomarker-guided protocol is not found to be effective, then it will be important to avoid its use in sepsis and prevent ineffective technology becoming widely adopted in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"24 4","pages":"427-434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10572477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437231169193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To describe the protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to determine whether treatment protocols monitoring daily CRP (C-reactive protein) or PCT (procalcitonin) safely allow a reduction in duration of antibiotic therapy in hospitalised adult patients with sepsis.

Design: Multicentre three-arm randomised controlled trial.

Setting: UK NHS hospitals.

Target population: Hospitalised critically ill adults who have been commenced on intravenous antibiotics for sepsis.

Health technology: Three protocols for guiding antibiotic discontinuation will be compared: (a) standard care; (b) standard care + daily CRP monitoring; (c) standard care + daily PCT monitoring. Standard care will be based on routine sepsis management and antibiotic stewardship. Measurement of outcomes and costs. Outcomes will be assessed to 28 days. The primary outcomes are total duration of antibiotics and safety outcome of all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes include: escalation of care/re-admission; infection re-lapse/recurrence; antibiotic dose; length and level of critical care stay and length of hospital stay. Ninety-day all-cause mortality rates will also be collected. An assessment of cost effectiveness will be performed.

Conclusion: In the setting of routine NHS care, if this trial finds that a treatment protocol based on monitoring CRP or PCT safely allows a reduction in duration of antibiotic therapy, and is cost effective, then this has the potential to change clinical practice for critically ill patients with sepsis. Moreover, if a biomarker-guided protocol is not found to be effective, then it will be important to avoid its use in sepsis and prevent ineffective technology becoming widely adopted in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物标志物指导的疑似脓毒症住院患者抗生素治疗持续时间:一项多中心随机对照试验的方案。
目的:描述一项多中心随机对照试验的方案,以确定监测每日CRP(C反应蛋白)或PCT(降钙素原)的治疗方案是否可以安全地缩短败血症住院成年患者的抗生素治疗时间。设计:多中心三组随机对照试验。背景:英国国家医疗服务体系医院。目标人群:已开始静脉注射抗生素治疗败血症的住院危重成年人。卫生技术:将比较指导抗生素停用的三个方案:(a)标准护理;(b) 标准护理+每日CRP监测;(c) 标准护理+每日PCT监测。标准护理将以常规败血症管理和抗生素管理为基础。成果和成本的衡量。结果将评估为28 天。主要结果是抗生素的总持续时间和全因死亡率的安全性结果。次要结果包括:护理升级/再次入院;感染复发;抗生素剂量;重症监护住院时间和水平以及住院时间。还将收集90天全因死亡率。将对成本效益进行评估。结论:在常规NHS护理的环境中,如果该试验发现基于监测CRP或PCT的治疗方案可以安全地缩短抗生素治疗的持续时间,并且具有成本效益,那么这有可能改变败血症危重患者的临床实践。此外,如果生物标志物引导的方案没有被发现是有效的,那么重要的是避免其在败血症中的使用,并防止无效技术在临床实践中被广泛采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
期刊最新文献
Delivery of evidence-based critical care practices across the United Kingdom: A UK-wide multi-site service evaluation in adult units. In vivo assessment of a modification of a domiciliary ventilator which reduces oxygen consumption in mechanically ventilated patients. Management of adult mechanically ventilated patients: A UK-wide survey. Small volume fluid resuscitation and supplementation with 20% albumin versus buffered crystalloids in adults with septic shock: A protocol for a randomised feasibility trial. Should viscoelastic testing be a standard point-of-care test on all intensive care units?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1