Holistic Approach to Enhance Airborne Infection Control Practices in Health Care Facilities Involved in the Management of Tuberculosis in a Metropolitan City in India - An Implementation Research.

Daniel Bella Devaleenal, Lavanya Jeyapal, Kannan Thiruvengadam, Prathiksha Giridharan, Banurekha Velayudham, Rajendran Krishnan, Abinaya Baskaran, Hephzibah Mercy, Baskaran Dhanaraj, Padmapriyadarsini Chandrasekaran
{"title":"Holistic Approach to Enhance Airborne Infection Control Practices in Health Care Facilities Involved in the Management of Tuberculosis in a Metropolitan City in India - An Implementation Research.","authors":"Daniel Bella Devaleenal,&nbsp;Lavanya Jeyapal,&nbsp;Kannan Thiruvengadam,&nbsp;Prathiksha Giridharan,&nbsp;Banurekha Velayudham,&nbsp;Rajendran Krishnan,&nbsp;Abinaya Baskaran,&nbsp;Hephzibah Mercy,&nbsp;Baskaran Dhanaraj,&nbsp;Padmapriyadarsini Chandrasekaran","doi":"10.4103/WHO-SEAJPH.WHO-SEAJPH_128_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Airborne infection control (AIC) is a less focused aspect of tuberculosis (TB) prevention. We describe AIC practices in primary health care centres, awareness and practices of AIC among health care providers (HCPs) and TB patients. We implemented a package of interventions to improve awareness and practices among them and assessed its impact.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study used a quasi-experimental study design. A semi-structured checklist was used for health facility assessment and a self-administered questionnaire of HCPs. Pre- and postintervention assessments were made in urban primary health centers (UPHCs), HCPs, and patients. Interventions included sharing facility-specific recommendations, AIC plans and guidelines, HCP training, and patient education. Statistical difference between the two time periods was assessed using the Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 and 25 UPHCs were included for pre- and postintervention assessments. All 25 centers participated in interventions. Open areas were >20% of ground area in all facilities. No AIC committee was present in any of the facilities at both pre- and postintervention. Of all HCPs, 7% (23/337) versus 65% (202/310) had undergone AIC training. Good awareness improved from 24% (81/337) to 71% (220/310) after intervention (P < 0.001). Appropriate cough hygiene was known to 20% (51/262) versus 58% (152/263) patients at two assessments (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comprehensive intervention, including supportive supervision of health centers, training of HCPs, and patient education, can improve AIC practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":37393,"journal":{"name":"WHO South-East Asia journal of public health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WHO South-East Asia journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/WHO-SEAJPH.WHO-SEAJPH_128_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Airborne infection control (AIC) is a less focused aspect of tuberculosis (TB) prevention. We describe AIC practices in primary health care centres, awareness and practices of AIC among health care providers (HCPs) and TB patients. We implemented a package of interventions to improve awareness and practices among them and assessed its impact.

Methodology: The study used a quasi-experimental study design. A semi-structured checklist was used for health facility assessment and a self-administered questionnaire of HCPs. Pre- and postintervention assessments were made in urban primary health centers (UPHCs), HCPs, and patients. Interventions included sharing facility-specific recommendations, AIC plans and guidelines, HCP training, and patient education. Statistical difference between the two time periods was assessed using the Chi-square test.

Results: A total of 23 and 25 UPHCs were included for pre- and postintervention assessments. All 25 centers participated in interventions. Open areas were >20% of ground area in all facilities. No AIC committee was present in any of the facilities at both pre- and postintervention. Of all HCPs, 7% (23/337) versus 65% (202/310) had undergone AIC training. Good awareness improved from 24% (81/337) to 71% (220/310) after intervention (P < 0.001). Appropriate cough hygiene was known to 20% (51/262) versus 58% (152/263) patients at two assessments (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Comprehensive intervention, including supportive supervision of health centers, training of HCPs, and patient education, can improve AIC practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在印度一个大都市参与结核病管理的医疗机构中加强空气传播感染控制实践的整体方法——一项实施研究。
背景:空气传播感染控制(AIC)是肺结核(TB)预防的一个不太关注的方面。我们描述了初级卫生保健中心的AIC实践,以及卫生保健提供者(HCP)和结核病患者对AIC的认识和实践。我们实施了一系列干预措施,以提高他们的认识和做法,并评估了其影响。方法:本研究采用准实验研究设计。半结构化检查表用于卫生设施评估和HCP的自填问卷。对城市初级卫生中心(UPHC)、HCP和患者进行干预前和干预后评估。干预措施包括分享设施具体建议、AIC计划和指南、HCP培训和患者教育。使用卡方检验评估两个时间段之间的统计差异。结果:共有23个和25个UPHC被纳入干预前和干预后评估。所有25个中心都参与了干预。开放区域占所有设施地面面积的20%以上。在干预前后,没有AIC委员会出现在任何设施中。在所有HCP中,7%(23/337)和65%(202/310)接受过AIC培训。良好的意识在干预后从24%(81/337)提高到71%(220/310)(P<0.001)。在两次评估中,20%(51/262)的患者知道适当的咳嗽卫生,而58%(152/263)的患者则知道(P=0.001)。结论:综合干预,包括卫生中心的支持性监督、HCP的培训和患者教育,可以改善AIC实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Public Health, Epidemiology, primary health care, epidemiology, health administration, health systems, health economics, health promotion, public health nutrition, communicable and non-communicable diseases, maternal and child health, occupational and environmental health, social and preventive medicine. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
期刊最新文献
"OpenWHO" SEARO NCD PEN-HEARTS Courses: Training 10000 Health Care Providers in 100 Countries in 100 Days. Locating "Community" in Antimicrobial Resistance Governance. Managing Health-care Workers and Strengthening Our Infrastructure. Perception and Disposal Practices of Toddler Feces by Mothers in Suburban Area of Kendari, Indonesia. Prevalence of Current Areca Nut Use and Its Associated Factors among Bhutanese Aged 15-69 Years: Analysis of the Nationally Representative STEPS Survey 2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1