Blood-brain barrier permeability and electroconvulsive therapy: a systematic review.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Acta Neuropsychiatrica Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1017/neu.2023.48
Christoffer C Lundsgaard, Krzysztof Gbyl, Poul Videbech
{"title":"Blood-brain barrier permeability and electroconvulsive therapy: a systematic review.","authors":"Christoffer C Lundsgaard, Krzysztof Gbyl, Poul Videbech","doi":"10.1017/neu.2023.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The cause of cognitive side effects after electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is largely unknown. Alterations in the blood-brain barrier (BBB) have been considered in several recent ECT studies. We therefore found it worthwhile to perform a systematic review of the literature to examine if electrically induced seizures affect the permeability of the BBB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase were searched 16 November 2022. Studies with a direct measurement of BBB permeability in animals treated with modified electroconvulsive stimulation (ECS) and in humans treated with ECT were included. Synthesis of results was narrative due to the low number of studies and differences in study designs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four animal and two human (31 participants) studies were included. In animals, two studies found increased BBB permeability to some smaller molecules after modified ECS, while the two other studies found marginally increased or unchanged permeability to albumin after treatment. In contrast, the human studies did not find increased BBB permeability to smaller molecules or albumin after ECT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Animal but not human studies support increased BBB permeability to some smaller molecules after electrically induced seizures. However, this conclusion is confined by the low number of studies and the lack of studies applying state-of-the-art methods. More studies using modern approaches to measuring of BBB permeability are warranted.</p><p><strong>Funding and registration: </strong>The study was founded by <i>Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark</i> (grant number 61151-05) and was registered on PROSPERO before data extraction was initiated (CRD42022331385).</p>","PeriodicalId":48964,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2023.48","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The cause of cognitive side effects after electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is largely unknown. Alterations in the blood-brain barrier (BBB) have been considered in several recent ECT studies. We therefore found it worthwhile to perform a systematic review of the literature to examine if electrically induced seizures affect the permeability of the BBB.

Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase were searched 16 November 2022. Studies with a direct measurement of BBB permeability in animals treated with modified electroconvulsive stimulation (ECS) and in humans treated with ECT were included. Synthesis of results was narrative due to the low number of studies and differences in study designs.

Results: Four animal and two human (31 participants) studies were included. In animals, two studies found increased BBB permeability to some smaller molecules after modified ECS, while the two other studies found marginally increased or unchanged permeability to albumin after treatment. In contrast, the human studies did not find increased BBB permeability to smaller molecules or albumin after ECT.

Conclusion: Animal but not human studies support increased BBB permeability to some smaller molecules after electrically induced seizures. However, this conclusion is confined by the low number of studies and the lack of studies applying state-of-the-art methods. More studies using modern approaches to measuring of BBB permeability are warranted.

Funding and registration: The study was founded by Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark (grant number 61151-05) and was registered on PROSPERO before data extraction was initiated (CRD42022331385).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血脑屏障通透性与电休克治疗——系统综述。
目的:电休克治疗(ECT)后认知副作用的原因在很大程度上是未知的。在最近的几项ECT研究中已经考虑了血脑屏障(BBB)的改变。因此,我们发现有必要对文献进行系统回顾,以检查电诱导癫痫发作是否会影响血脑屏障的通透性。方法:PubMed/MEDLINE和Embase于2022年11月16日检索。包括用改良电惊厥刺激(ECS)治疗的动物和用ECT治疗的人类血脑屏障通透性的直接测量研究。由于研究数量少和研究设计的差异,结果的综合是叙述性的。结果:包括4项动物和2项人类(31名参与者)研究。在动物中,两项研究发现改良ECS后血脑屏障对一些较小分子的通透性增加,而另外两项研究则发现治疗后对白蛋白的通透性略有增加或不变。相反,人体研究没有发现ECT后血脑屏障对小分子或白蛋白的通透性增加。然而,这一结论受到研究数量少和缺乏应用最先进方法的研究的限制。有必要使用现代方法对血脑屏障通透性进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
Acta Neuropsychiatrica NEUROSCIENCES-PSYCHIATRY
自引率
5.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Acta Neuropsychiatrica is an international journal focussing on translational neuropsychiatry. It publishes high-quality original research papers and reviews. The Journal''s scope specifically highlights the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health that can be viewed broadly as the spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health.
期刊最新文献
Bradykinin actions in the central nervous system: historical overview and psychiatric implications. Dysfunction of circulating endothelial progenitor cells in major depressive disorder. Moderating effects of diagnosis and gender on the influence of age on electroconvulsive therapy outcome. On hallucinations and memory: the relationship between hallucinations and autobiographical overgenerality in Alzheimer's Disease. Missed conceptions about paediatric bipolar disorder: a reply and discussion of DMDD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1