A multi-professional survey of UK practice in the use of intra-articular corticosteroid injection for symptomatic first metatarsophalangeal joint osteoarthritis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Foot and Ankle Research Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1186/s13047-023-00672-6
Michael R Backhouse, Jill Halstead, Edward Roddy, Vivek Dhukaram, Anna Chapman, Susanne Arnold, Julie Bruce
{"title":"A multi-professional survey of UK practice in the use of intra-articular corticosteroid injection for symptomatic first metatarsophalangeal joint osteoarthritis.","authors":"Michael R Backhouse, Jill Halstead, Edward Roddy, Vivek Dhukaram, Anna Chapman, Susanne Arnold, Julie Bruce","doi":"10.1186/s13047-023-00672-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The first metatarsophalangeal joint is the most common site of osteoarthritis (OA) in the foot and ankle. Intra-articular corticosteroid injections are widely used for this condition, but little is known about their use in practice. This study explored current practice within the UK National Health Service (NHS) relating to the administration of intra-articular corticosteroids for people with painful first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) OA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey using Qualtrics online survey platform (Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA), distributed through professional bodies, special interest groups, and social media.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred forty-four healthcare professionals responded, including podiatrists (53/144; 39%), orthopaedic surgeons (28/144; 19%), podiatric surgeons (26/144; 17%) and physiotherapists (24/144; 16%). Half of respondents administered up to 25 corticosteroid injections per year (67/136; 49%) but some administered more than fifty (21/136; 15%). Injections were administered across the healthcare system but were most common in hospital settings (64/136; 44%) followed by community (38/136; 26%), with less delivered in primary care (11/136; 8%). Half of respondents routinely used image-guidance, either ultrasound or x-ray/fluoroscopy (65/136; 48%) although over one third used none (52/136; 38%). Imaging guidance was more common amongst medical professionals (21/31; 68%) compared to non-medical health professionals (45/105; 43%). Overall, methylprednisolone acetate was the most common corticosteroid used. Medical professionals mostly injected methylprednisolone acetate (n = 15/27; 56%) or triamcinolone acetonide (n = 11/27; 41%), whereas premixed methylprednisolone acetate with lidocaine hydrochloride was the most common preparation used by non-medical health professionals (41/85; 48%). When injecting non premixed steroid, lidocaine hydrochloride (15/35; 43%) was the most common choice of local anaesthetic for non-medical health professionals but medical professionals showed more variation between lidocaine hydrochloride (8/23; 35%) levobupivacaine hydrochloride (9/23; 39%) and bupivacaine hydrochloride (5/23; 22%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple professional groups regularly administer intra-articular corticosteroids for symptomatic first MTPJ OA across a range of NHS healthcare settings. Overall, methylprednisolone acetate was the most commonly administered steroid and lidocaine hydrochloride the most common local anaesthetic. There was large variation in the use of imaging guidance, type and dose of steroid, local anaesthetic, and clinical pathways used in the intra-articular injection of corticosteroids for people with first MTPJ OA.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10580568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-023-00672-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The first metatarsophalangeal joint is the most common site of osteoarthritis (OA) in the foot and ankle. Intra-articular corticosteroid injections are widely used for this condition, but little is known about their use in practice. This study explored current practice within the UK National Health Service (NHS) relating to the administration of intra-articular corticosteroids for people with painful first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) OA.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey using Qualtrics online survey platform (Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA), distributed through professional bodies, special interest groups, and social media.

Results: One hundred forty-four healthcare professionals responded, including podiatrists (53/144; 39%), orthopaedic surgeons (28/144; 19%), podiatric surgeons (26/144; 17%) and physiotherapists (24/144; 16%). Half of respondents administered up to 25 corticosteroid injections per year (67/136; 49%) but some administered more than fifty (21/136; 15%). Injections were administered across the healthcare system but were most common in hospital settings (64/136; 44%) followed by community (38/136; 26%), with less delivered in primary care (11/136; 8%). Half of respondents routinely used image-guidance, either ultrasound or x-ray/fluoroscopy (65/136; 48%) although over one third used none (52/136; 38%). Imaging guidance was more common amongst medical professionals (21/31; 68%) compared to non-medical health professionals (45/105; 43%). Overall, methylprednisolone acetate was the most common corticosteroid used. Medical professionals mostly injected methylprednisolone acetate (n = 15/27; 56%) or triamcinolone acetonide (n = 11/27; 41%), whereas premixed methylprednisolone acetate with lidocaine hydrochloride was the most common preparation used by non-medical health professionals (41/85; 48%). When injecting non premixed steroid, lidocaine hydrochloride (15/35; 43%) was the most common choice of local anaesthetic for non-medical health professionals but medical professionals showed more variation between lidocaine hydrochloride (8/23; 35%) levobupivacaine hydrochloride (9/23; 39%) and bupivacaine hydrochloride (5/23; 22%).

Conclusions: Multiple professional groups regularly administer intra-articular corticosteroids for symptomatic first MTPJ OA across a range of NHS healthcare settings. Overall, methylprednisolone acetate was the most commonly administered steroid and lidocaine hydrochloride the most common local anaesthetic. There was large variation in the use of imaging guidance, type and dose of steroid, local anaesthetic, and clinical pathways used in the intra-articular injection of corticosteroids for people with first MTPJ OA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项关于英国使用关节内皮质类固醇注射治疗症状性第一跖趾关节骨关节炎的多专业调查。
背景:第一跖趾关节是足部和脚踝骨关节炎(OA)最常见的部位。关节内皮质类固醇注射被广泛用于治疗这种疾病,但对其在实践中的应用知之甚少。本研究探讨了英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)目前对疼痛的第一跖趾关节(MTPJ)OA患者使用关节内皮质类固醇的做法。方法:使用Qualtrics在线调查平台(Qualtrics,Provo,UT,USA)进行的横断面调查,通过专业机构、特殊兴趣团体和社交媒体进行分发。结果:一百四十四名医疗保健专业人员做出了回应,包括足科医生(53/144;39%)、整形外科医生(28/144;19%)、足科外科医生(26/144;17%)和理疗师(24/144;16%)。一半的受访者每年注射25次皮质类固醇(67/136;49%),但也有一些人注射了50多次(21/136;15%)。注射在整个医疗系统中进行,但在医院最常见(64/136;44%),其次是社区(38/136;26%),在初级保健中注射较少(11/136;8%)。一半的受访者经常使用图像引导,无论是超声波还是x射线/荧光镜检查(65/136;48%),尽管超过三分之一的受访者没有使用图像引导(52/136;38%)。与非医疗卫生专业人员(45/105;43%)相比,成像指导在医疗专业人员中更常见(21/31;68%)。总的来说,醋酸甲基强的松龙是最常用的皮质类固醇。医疗专业人员大多注射醋酸甲基强的松龙(n = 15/27;56%)或曲安奈德(n = 11/27;41%),而醋酸甲基强的松龙与盐酸利多卡因的预混制剂是非医疗卫生专业人员使用的最常见的制剂(41/85;48%)。当注射非预混类固醇时,盐酸利多卡因(15/35;43%)是非医疗卫生专业人员最常见的局部麻醉剂选择,但医疗专业人员显示,盐酸利多卡因(8/23;35%)左布比卡因盐酸盐(9/23;39%)和布比卡因盐酸(5/23;22%)之间的差异更大在一系列NHS医疗机构中出现症状的第一例MTPJ OA。总的来说,醋酸甲基强的松龙是最常用的类固醇,盐酸利多卡因是最常见的局部麻醉剂。首次MTPJ OA患者关节内注射皮质类固醇的影像学指导、类固醇类型和剂量、局部麻醉和临床途径的使用存在很大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care. The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care. The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.
期刊最新文献
Association between clinical and MRI-detected imaging findings for people with midfoot pain, a cross-sectional study. Measurement of plantar pressure differences in the contralateral limb when using offloading modalities for diabetic foot ulcerations. Anatomical dissection influences emotions of podiatry students. Harnessing the drucebo effect: A new frontier in podiatric patient care. Implementation of a clinical pathway for diabetes-related foot ulcers reduced the number of amputations and shortened hospital stay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1