Preferences on Delivery of Cancer Rehabilitation Services for Cancer-Related Disability Among Older Individuals Surviving Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

IF 1 Q4 ONCOLOGY Rehabilitation Oncology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-12 DOI:10.1097/01.reo.0000000000000341
Rachelle Brick, Kathleen Doyle Lyons, Catherine Bender, Rachel Eilers, Robert Ferguson, Mackenzi Pergolotti, Pamela Toto, Elizabeth Skidmore, Natalie E Leland
{"title":"Preferences on Delivery of Cancer Rehabilitation Services for Cancer-Related Disability Among Older Individuals Surviving Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Rachelle Brick, Kathleen Doyle Lyons, Catherine Bender, Rachel Eilers, Robert Ferguson, Mackenzi Pergolotti, Pamela Toto, Elizabeth Skidmore, Natalie E Leland","doi":"10.1097/01.reo.0000000000000341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older individuals surviving breast cancer often encounter cancer-related disability as a short-term or long-term effect of cancer and related treatment. Cancer rehabilitation interventions have the potential to prevent, mitigate, or remediate cancer-related disability. However, use of these services remains limited. Understanding the priorities and perspectives of older individuals surviving breast cancer is key to developing effective and implementable cancer rehabilitation interventions. This qualitative descriptive study examined individuals' preferred and valued methods of cancer rehabilitation intervention delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a qualitative descriptive design, older individuals surviving breast cancer (n=14) completed a single telephone-based semi-structure interview. Interviews explored survivors' preferences for cancer rehabilitation service delivery. Interview transcriptions were thematically analyzed. Open codes were inductively generated and reviewed for agreement by an independent reviewer. The codes were deductively organized. Differences were resolved through consensus meetings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed preferred intervention delivery characteristics for intervention setting, mode of delivery, format, and timing. Participants predominantly preferred interventions delivered in community-based settings, with both in-person and remote components. Participants also appeared to value one-on-one interventions and those delivered post-treatment. Survivors' overarching preferences were based on desire for patient-centric care, one-on-one therapist time, complex medical schedules, and financial concerns.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Study findings provide guidance on the modification of existing and creation of new cancer rehabilitation interventions addressing cancer-related disability in older individuals surviving breast cancer. Adoption of stakeholder-driven intervention delivery characteristics may improve value and acceptability of interventions. Future intervention research should incorporate and test these characteristics to ensure their effectiveness in real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54153,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Oncology","volume":"41 3","pages":"139-148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10574708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.reo.0000000000000341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older individuals surviving breast cancer often encounter cancer-related disability as a short-term or long-term effect of cancer and related treatment. Cancer rehabilitation interventions have the potential to prevent, mitigate, or remediate cancer-related disability. However, use of these services remains limited. Understanding the priorities and perspectives of older individuals surviving breast cancer is key to developing effective and implementable cancer rehabilitation interventions. This qualitative descriptive study examined individuals' preferred and valued methods of cancer rehabilitation intervention delivery.

Methods: Using a qualitative descriptive design, older individuals surviving breast cancer (n=14) completed a single telephone-based semi-structure interview. Interviews explored survivors' preferences for cancer rehabilitation service delivery. Interview transcriptions were thematically analyzed. Open codes were inductively generated and reviewed for agreement by an independent reviewer. The codes were deductively organized. Differences were resolved through consensus meetings.

Results: Findings revealed preferred intervention delivery characteristics for intervention setting, mode of delivery, format, and timing. Participants predominantly preferred interventions delivered in community-based settings, with both in-person and remote components. Participants also appeared to value one-on-one interventions and those delivered post-treatment. Survivors' overarching preferences were based on desire for patient-centric care, one-on-one therapist time, complex medical schedules, and financial concerns.

Discussion: Study findings provide guidance on the modification of existing and creation of new cancer rehabilitation interventions addressing cancer-related disability in older individuals surviving breast cancer. Adoption of stakeholder-driven intervention delivery characteristics may improve value and acceptability of interventions. Future intervention research should incorporate and test these characteristics to ensure their effectiveness in real-world settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症老年人癌症相关残疾癌症康复服务的选择:一项定性研究。
背景:患有癌症的老年人通常会遇到癌症相关残疾,这是癌症和相关治疗的短期或长期影响。癌症康复干预有可能预防、减轻或补救癌症相关残疾。然而,这些服务的使用仍然有限。了解患有癌症的老年人的优先事项和观点是制定有效和可实施的癌症康复干预措施的关键。这项定性描述性研究考察了个体对癌症康复干预提供的首选和有价值的方法。方法:采用定性描述性设计,癌症幸存的老年人(n=14)完成了一次基于电话的半结构访谈。访谈探讨了幸存者对癌症康复服务提供的偏好。对访谈录进行主题分析。开放代码是归纳生成的,并由独立评审员进行评审以达成一致。代码是演绎式组织的。分歧通过协商一致会议得到解决。结果:研究结果揭示了干预设置、提供方式、形式和时间的首选干预提供特征。参与者主要倾向于在社区环境中提供干预措施,包括亲自干预和远程干预。参与者似乎也重视一对一干预和那些提供治疗后的干预。幸存者的总体偏好是基于对以患者为中心的护理、一对一治疗师时间、复杂的医疗时间表和财务问题的渴望。讨论:研究结果为修改现有和创建新的癌症康复干预措施提供了指导,以解决癌症老年患者癌症相关残疾问题。采用利益相关者驱动的干预措施实施特征可以提高干预措施的价值和可接受性。未来的干预研究应该结合并测试这些特征,以确保它们在现实世界中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Assessment of rehabilitation practices during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the United States: a survey. Indocyanine Green Lymphography in Conservative Lymphedema Therapy: A Scoping Review A Review of Late Effects in Pediatric Cancer: Implications for Rehabilitation The Psychological and Biological Benefits of Mind-Body Therapy Interventions for Informal Caregivers of Individuals With Cancer: A Systematic Review The Effect of Inspiratory Muscle Training in Patients With Lung Cancer After Surgery: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1