Rehabilitation after lumbar spine surgery in adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1186/s40945-023-00175-4
Tiziana Manni, Nicola Ferri, Carla Vanti, Silvano Ferrari, Ilaria Cuoghi, Claudia Gaeta, Isabella Sgaravatti, Paolo Pillastrini
{"title":"Rehabilitation after lumbar spine surgery in adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Tiziana Manni, Nicola Ferri, Carla Vanti, Silvano Ferrari, Ilaria Cuoghi, Claudia Gaeta, Isabella Sgaravatti, Paolo Pillastrini","doi":"10.1186/s40945-023-00175-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of rehabilitation after surgery in patients with low back pain is well recognized. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and update the existing evidence according to the type of clinical condition and rehabilitation approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review included RCTs on the effectiveness of rehabilitation after surgery for lumbar disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and spondylolisthesis. We searched the literature for randomized controlled trials indexed in MEDLINE, Embase, CINHAL, CENTRAL, Scopus, PEDro, and Web of Science databases, up to April 15, 2023. We used Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool to assess each study. We conducted a quantitative synthesis when population, intervention, control, and outcome were sufficiently homogeneous; otherwise, we conducted a qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five studies (3.036 subjects) were included and analyzed according to the population considered: lumbar stenosis (1 trial), spondylolisthesis (3 trials), and disc herniation (41 trials). Regarding lumbar stenosis, a supervised active exercise program appears to improve outcomes related to pain, disability, and quality of life both in the short- and mid-term (1 study, n = 60). Concerning spondylolisthesis, kinesiophobia is reduced in the home exercises group compared to usual care, at 3-months follow-up (3 studies, n = 98). For disk herniation, supervised exercises are better than non-supervised exercises to reduce pain (MD -1.14; 95% CIs -1.65, -0.62; 5 trials, n = 250) and disability (SMD -0.70; 95% CIs -1.14, -0.26; 4 trials, n = 175). Supervised exercises are better than advice in reducing pain (SMD -0.91; 95% CIs -1.61, -0.21; 5 trials, n = 341) and disability (SMD -0.80; 95% CIs -1.59, -0.01; 4 trials, n = 261), in the short-term. Supervised exercises are equal to no treatment in reducing pain and disability, at 3 and 6 months after intervention (2 trials, n = 166). These results are supported by a very low to low quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our research suggests that supervised exercise may be effective in improving patient's pain and disability after lumbar surgery, but RCTs regarding lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar spondylolisthesis are still scarce, with significant heterogeneity of proposed interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578022/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-023-00175-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The role of rehabilitation after surgery in patients with low back pain is well recognized. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and update the existing evidence according to the type of clinical condition and rehabilitation approach.

Methods: This systematic review included RCTs on the effectiveness of rehabilitation after surgery for lumbar disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and spondylolisthesis. We searched the literature for randomized controlled trials indexed in MEDLINE, Embase, CINHAL, CENTRAL, Scopus, PEDro, and Web of Science databases, up to April 15, 2023. We used Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool to assess each study. We conducted a quantitative synthesis when population, intervention, control, and outcome were sufficiently homogeneous; otherwise, we conducted a qualitative analysis.

Results: Forty-five studies (3.036 subjects) were included and analyzed according to the population considered: lumbar stenosis (1 trial), spondylolisthesis (3 trials), and disc herniation (41 trials). Regarding lumbar stenosis, a supervised active exercise program appears to improve outcomes related to pain, disability, and quality of life both in the short- and mid-term (1 study, n = 60). Concerning spondylolisthesis, kinesiophobia is reduced in the home exercises group compared to usual care, at 3-months follow-up (3 studies, n = 98). For disk herniation, supervised exercises are better than non-supervised exercises to reduce pain (MD -1.14; 95% CIs -1.65, -0.62; 5 trials, n = 250) and disability (SMD -0.70; 95% CIs -1.14, -0.26; 4 trials, n = 175). Supervised exercises are better than advice in reducing pain (SMD -0.91; 95% CIs -1.61, -0.21; 5 trials, n = 341) and disability (SMD -0.80; 95% CIs -1.59, -0.01; 4 trials, n = 261), in the short-term. Supervised exercises are equal to no treatment in reducing pain and disability, at 3 and 6 months after intervention (2 trials, n = 166). These results are supported by a very low to low quality of evidence.

Conclusions: Our research suggests that supervised exercise may be effective in improving patient's pain and disability after lumbar surgery, but RCTs regarding lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar spondylolisthesis are still scarce, with significant heterogeneity of proposed interventions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人腰椎手术后的康复:一项荟萃分析系统综述。
背景:术后康复在腰痛患者中的作用是公认的。本系统综述的目的是根据临床状况的类型和康复方法总结和更新现有证据。方法:本系统综述包括对腰椎间盘突出症、椎管狭窄和脊椎滑脱术后康复效果的随机对照试验。截至2023年4月15日,我们在MEDLINE、Embase、CINHAL、CENTRAL、Scopus、PEDro和Web of Science数据库中检索了随机对照试验的文献。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险2.0工具来评估每项研究。当人群、干预、控制和结果足够均匀时,我们进行了定量综合;除此之外,我们进行了定性分析。结果:纳入45项研究(3.036名受试者),并根据所考虑的人群进行分析:腰椎管狭窄症(1项试验)、脊椎滑脱症(3项试验)和椎间盘突出症(41项试验)。关于腰椎管狭窄症,在短期和中期,有监督的积极锻炼计划似乎可以改善与疼痛、残疾和生活质量相关的结果(1项研究,n = 60)。关于脊椎滑脱,在3个月的随访中,与常规护理相比,家庭锻炼组的运动恐惧症有所减少(3项研究,n = 98)。对于椎间盘突出症,有监督的运动比无监督的运动更好地减轻疼痛(MD-1.14;95%CI-1.65,-0.62;5项试验,n = 250)和残疾(SMD-0.70;95%置信区间-1.14,-0.26;4项试验,n = 175)。有监督的运动在减轻疼痛方面优于建议(SMD-0.91;95%置信区间-1.61,-0.21;5项试验,n = 341)和残疾(SMD-0.80;95%置信区间-1.59,-0.01;4项试验,n = 261)。在干预后的3个月和6个月,有监督的锻炼在减轻疼痛和残疾方面等于没有治疗(2项试验,n = 166)。这些结果得到了非常低到低质量的证据的支持。结论:我们的研究表明,有监督的运动可能有效地改善患者在腰椎手术后的疼痛和残疾,但关于腰椎管狭窄症和腰椎滑脱症的随机对照试验仍然很少,所提出的干预措施具有显著的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hip microinstability and its association with femoroacetabular impingement: A scoping review. Impact of direct access on the quality of primary care musculoskeletal physiotherapy: a scoping review from a patient, provider, and societal perspective. The psychometric properties of the modified fear of falling avoidance behavior questionnaire in Parkinson's disease and older adults. Pragmatism in manual therapy trials for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Implementation of community physiotherapy in primary care: one-year results of an on-call physiotherapy service.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1