Feeding and developmental outcomes after neonatal seizures—A prospective observational study

Katelyn H. Roberts, John D. E. Barks, Hannah C. Glass, Janet S. Soul, Taeun Chang, Courtney J. Wusthoff, Catherine J. Chu, Shavonne L. Massey, Nicholas S. Abend, Monica E. Lemmon, Cameron Thomas, Ronnie Guillet, Elizabeth E. Rogers, Linda S. Franck, Harlan McCaffery, Yi Li, Charles E. McCulloch, Renée A. Shellhaas
{"title":"Feeding and developmental outcomes after neonatal seizures—A prospective observational study","authors":"Katelyn H. Roberts,&nbsp;John D. E. Barks,&nbsp;Hannah C. Glass,&nbsp;Janet S. Soul,&nbsp;Taeun Chang,&nbsp;Courtney J. Wusthoff,&nbsp;Catherine J. Chu,&nbsp;Shavonne L. Massey,&nbsp;Nicholas S. Abend,&nbsp;Monica E. Lemmon,&nbsp;Cameron Thomas,&nbsp;Ronnie Guillet,&nbsp;Elizabeth E. Rogers,&nbsp;Linda S. Franck,&nbsp;Harlan McCaffery,&nbsp;Yi Li,&nbsp;Charles E. McCulloch,&nbsp;Renée A. Shellhaas","doi":"10.1002/cns3.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Among neonates with acute symptomatic seizures, we evaluated whether the inability to take full feeds at the time of hospital discharge from neonatal seizure admission is associated with worse neurodevelopmental outcomes, after adjusting for relevant clinical variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective, nine-center study of the Neonatal Seizure Registry (NSR) assessed characteristics of infants with seizures, including evidence of brainstem injury on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), mode of feeding upon discharge, and developmental outcomes at 12, 18, and 24 months. The inability to take oral feeds was identified through a review of medical records. Brainstem injury was identified through a central review of neonatal MRIs. Developmental outcomes were assessed with the Warner Initial Developmental Evaluation of Adaptive and Functional Skills (WIDEA-FS) at 12, 18, and 24 months corrected age.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 276 infants, inability to achieve full oral feeds was associated with lower total WIDEA-FS scores (160.2 ± 25.5 for full oral feeds vs. 121.8 ± 42.9 for some/no oral feeds at 24 months, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). At 12 months, a gastrostomy tube was required for 23 of the 49 (47%) infants who did not achieve full oral feeds, compared with 2 of the 221 (1%) who took full feeds at discharge (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The inability to take full oral feeds upon hospital discharge is an objective clinical sign that can identify infants with acute symptomatic neonatal seizures who are at high risk for impaired development at 24 months.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72232,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Child Neurology Society","volume":"1 3","pages":"209-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cns3.6","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Child Neurology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cns3.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

Among neonates with acute symptomatic seizures, we evaluated whether the inability to take full feeds at the time of hospital discharge from neonatal seizure admission is associated with worse neurodevelopmental outcomes, after adjusting for relevant clinical variables.

Methods

This prospective, nine-center study of the Neonatal Seizure Registry (NSR) assessed characteristics of infants with seizures, including evidence of brainstem injury on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), mode of feeding upon discharge, and developmental outcomes at 12, 18, and 24 months. The inability to take oral feeds was identified through a review of medical records. Brainstem injury was identified through a central review of neonatal MRIs. Developmental outcomes were assessed with the Warner Initial Developmental Evaluation of Adaptive and Functional Skills (WIDEA-FS) at 12, 18, and 24 months corrected age.

Results

Among 276 infants, inability to achieve full oral feeds was associated with lower total WIDEA-FS scores (160.2 ± 25.5 for full oral feeds vs. 121.8 ± 42.9 for some/no oral feeds at 24 months, p < 0.001). At 12 months, a gastrostomy tube was required for 23 of the 49 (47%) infants who did not achieve full oral feeds, compared with 2 of the 221 (1%) who took full feeds at discharge (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The inability to take full oral feeds upon hospital discharge is an objective clinical sign that can identify infants with acute symptomatic neonatal seizures who are at high risk for impaired development at 24 months.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿癫痫后的喂养和发育结果——一项前瞻性观察性研究。
目的:在患有急性症状性癫痫的新生儿中,我们评估了在对相关临床变量进行调整后,新生儿癫痫入院出院时无法进食是否与更差的神经发育结果有关。方法:这项新生儿癫痫发作登记处(NSR)的前瞻性9中心研究评估了癫痫发作婴儿的特征,包括:MRI上脑干损伤的证据、出院后的喂养模式以及12、18和24个月时的发育结果。通过对医疗记录的审查,确定了无法口服饲料的情况。脑干损伤是通过新生儿核磁共振成像的中心审查确定的。在12个月、18个月和24个月校正年龄时,使用华纳适应和功能技能初始发展评估(WIDEA-FS)评估发展结果。结果:276例婴儿中,无法完全口服与WIDEA-FS总分较低有关(全口喂养160.2±25.5,24个月时部分/无口喂养121.8±42.9,P结论:出院后不能全口喂养是一个客观的临床症状,可以识别出患有急性症状性新生儿癫痫的婴儿,这些婴儿在24个月后发育受损的风险很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Postconcussive symptom severity, risk factors for prolonged recovery, and mental health history: Pathways of influence in a diverse pediatric sample GRIN1-related epilepsy in a neonate with response to memantine and vigabatrin Exaggerated T-wave alternans in children with Angelman syndrome Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1