Service trends among non-obstetrics/gynecology providers in the U.S.: Long-acting reversible contraception insertions, removals, and re-insertions

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100919
Kyle J. Moon , Kathryn A. Hasenstab , Ian Bryant , Lenisa V. Chang , Eric E. Seiber , Alison H. Norris , Saira Nawaz
{"title":"Service trends among non-obstetrics/gynecology providers in the U.S.: Long-acting reversible contraception insertions, removals, and re-insertions","authors":"Kyle J. Moon ,&nbsp;Kathryn A. Hasenstab ,&nbsp;Ian Bryant ,&nbsp;Lenisa V. Chang ,&nbsp;Eric E. Seiber ,&nbsp;Alison H. Norris ,&nbsp;Saira Nawaz","doi":"10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study evaluates trends in long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) services among obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) and non-OB/GYNs in the U.S. during 2012–2018. Using public and private insurance claims from the Symphony Health database, we calculated the percentage of LARC insertions, removals, and reinsertions performed by OB/GYNs and non-OB/GYNs. We then assessed time trends with linear regression. The proportion of LARC services that were performed by non-OBGYNs increased modestly between 2012 and 2018. Increases were similar for insertions, removals, and reinsertions. Further research is needed to understand trends in LARC service provision within primary care to better tailor medical training and policy interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54199,"journal":{"name":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187757562300109X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates trends in long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) services among obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) and non-OB/GYNs in the U.S. during 2012–2018. Using public and private insurance claims from the Symphony Health database, we calculated the percentage of LARC insertions, removals, and reinsertions performed by OB/GYNs and non-OB/GYNs. We then assessed time trends with linear regression. The proportion of LARC services that were performed by non-OBGYNs increased modestly between 2012 and 2018. Increases were similar for insertions, removals, and reinsertions. Further research is needed to understand trends in LARC service provision within primary care to better tailor medical training and policy interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国非产科/妇科提供者的服务趋势:长效可逆避孕插入、移除和再插入。
本研究评估了2012-2018年美国妇产科医生和非妇产科医生长效可逆避孕(LARC)服务的趋势。使用Symphony Health数据库中的公共和私人保险索赔,我们计算了妇产科医生和非妇产科医生进行LARC插入、移除和重新插入的百分比。然后,我们用线性回归来评估时间趋势。2012年至2018年间,非妇产科医生提供的LARC服务比例略有上升。插入、移除和重新插入的增幅相似。需要进一步研究,以了解初级保健中LARC服务提供的趋势,从而更好地调整医疗培训和政策干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
73
审稿时长
45 days
期刊最新文献
Investigating the associations between early labour onset symptoms and self-diagnosed labour onset in a cohort study of primiparas Overuse of intrapartum CTG monitoring in low-risk women in Norway Editorial Board The conclusion of CTG overuse is not justified Hysterectomy and medical financial hardship among U.S. women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1