Reducing antibiotic prescribing in general practice in Australia: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a multimodal intervention.

Minyon L Avent, Lisa Hall, Mieke van Driel, Annette Dobson, Laura Deckx, Mahmoud Galal, Malene Plejdrup Hansen, Charles Gilks
{"title":"Reducing antibiotic prescribing in general practice in Australia: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a multimodal intervention.","authors":"Minyon L Avent, Lisa Hall, Mieke van Driel, Annette Dobson, Laura Deckx, Mahmoud Galal, Malene Plejdrup Hansen, Charles Gilks","doi":"10.1071/PY23024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The health and economic burden of antimicrobial resistance (in Australia is significant. Interventions that help guide and improve appropriate prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in the community represent an opportunity to slow the spread of resistant bacteria. Clinicians who work in primary care are potentially the most influential health care professionals to address the problem of antimicrobial resistance, because this is where most antibiotics are prescribed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cluster randomised trial was conducted comparing two parallel groups of 27 urban general practices in Queensland, Australia: 13 intervention and 14 control practices, with 56 and 54 general practitioners (GPs), respectively. This study evaluated an integrated, multifaceted evidence-based package of interventions implemented over a 6-month period. The evaluation included quantitative and qualitative components, and an economic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A multimodal package of interventions resulted in a reduction of 3.81 prescriptions per GP per month. This equates to 1280.16 prescriptions for the 56GPs in the intervention practices over the 6-month period. The cost per prescription avoided was A$148. The qualitative feedback showed that the interventions were well received by the GPs and did not impact on consultation time. Providing GPs with a choice of tools might enhance their uptake and support for antimicrobial stewardship in the community.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A multimodal package of interventions to enhance rational prescribing of antibiotics is effective, feasible and acceptable in general practice. Investment in antimicrobial stewardship strategies in primary care may ultimately provide the important returns for public health into the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":" ","pages":"NULL"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY23024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The health and economic burden of antimicrobial resistance (in Australia is significant. Interventions that help guide and improve appropriate prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in the community represent an opportunity to slow the spread of resistant bacteria. Clinicians who work in primary care are potentially the most influential health care professionals to address the problem of antimicrobial resistance, because this is where most antibiotics are prescribed.

Methods: A cluster randomised trial was conducted comparing two parallel groups of 27 urban general practices in Queensland, Australia: 13 intervention and 14 control practices, with 56 and 54 general practitioners (GPs), respectively. This study evaluated an integrated, multifaceted evidence-based package of interventions implemented over a 6-month period. The evaluation included quantitative and qualitative components, and an economic analysis.

Results: A multimodal package of interventions resulted in a reduction of 3.81 prescriptions per GP per month. This equates to 1280.16 prescriptions for the 56GPs in the intervention practices over the 6-month period. The cost per prescription avoided was A$148. The qualitative feedback showed that the interventions were well received by the GPs and did not impact on consultation time. Providing GPs with a choice of tools might enhance their uptake and support for antimicrobial stewardship in the community.

Conclusions: A multimodal package of interventions to enhance rational prescribing of antibiotics is effective, feasible and acceptable in general practice. Investment in antimicrobial stewardship strategies in primary care may ultimately provide the important returns for public health into the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少澳大利亚全科医学中的抗生素处方:一项多模式干预的集群随机对照试验。
背景:抗微生物耐药性的健康和经济负担(在澳大利亚意义重大。有助于指导和改进社区中急性呼吸道感染的适当处方的干预措施代表了减缓耐药细菌传播的机会。从事初级保健工作的临床医生可能是解决抗微生物耐药性问题最具影响力的卫生保健专业人员,因为这是大多数人胫骨是处方药。方法:进行了一项集群随机试验,比较了澳大利亚昆士兰27个城市全科医生的两个平行组:13个干预组和14个对照组,分别与56个和54个全科医生(GP)。这项研究评估了在6个月内实施的综合、多方面的循证干预措施。评估包括定量和定性部分以及经济分析。结果:多模式一揽子干预措施使每个全科医生每月减少3.81张处方。这相当于在6个月的干预实践中为56名全科医生开出了1280.16张处方。每个处方的费用是148澳元。定性反馈显示,干预措施受到全科医生的好评,不会影响咨询时间。为全科医生提供工具选择可能会增强他们对社区抗菌药物管理的吸收和支持。结论:加强抗生素合理处方的多模式一揽子干预措施在全科医学中是有效、可行和可接受的。对初级保健抗菌药物管理策略的投资可能最终为未来的公共卫生带来重要回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Views of nurses and midwives working in primary healthcare services on intimate partner violence against women. The perspectives of people living with dementia and their carers on the role of the general practice nurse in dementia care provision: a qualitative study. Attitudes towards models of abortion care in sexual and reproductive health: perspectives of Australian health professionals. Investigating behaviours and attitudes regarding recommended vaccination in adults 50 years and above in Australia. Providing a localised cervical cancer screening course for general practice nurses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1