Influence of Different Surface Finishing Protocols on the Wear Behavior of Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramics.

Katia R Weber, Megha Satpathy, Susana Salazar Marocho, Jason A Griggs, Márcia Borba
{"title":"Influence of Different Surface Finishing Protocols on the Wear Behavior of Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramics.","authors":"Katia R Weber, Megha Satpathy, Susana Salazar Marocho, Jason A Griggs, Márcia Borba","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of different finishing protocols on the wear behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics (LD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Specimens were produced from LD prefabricated CAD/CAM blocks and divided into three groups according to the surface treatment (n = 8): control, polishing, and glaze. Ceramic specimens were subjected to wear testing using a dual-axis chewing simulator. A 49-N load was applied in the axial direction combined with a lateral movement (1-mm path) using an LD spherical piston for a total of 106 cycles. Qualitative analysis of the wear surface was performed using an optical microscope. Quantitative analysis of surface roughness and volume loss was performed using a confocal microscope and a 3D-image editing software, respectively. Surface roughness and volume loss data were analyzed using Friedman's nonparametric statistical test for repeated measures and the Student-Newman-Keuls test (α = .050).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were statistical differences for surface roughness and volume loss of LD specimens in the different experimental conditions (P < .001). The control and polishing groups showed similar surface roughness and volume loss values for all testing times. The glaze group had greater wear volume after 103, 104, and 105 cycles. After 106 cycles, surface roughness and volume loss were similar in all groups. For the piston, surface roughness was similar over time and among groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A distinct wear behavior was found for glazed glass-ceramic specimens compared to control and polished specimens. At the end of the simulation, the surface roughness and volume loss was similar for the groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"293-299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different finishing protocols on the wear behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics (LD).

Materials and methods: Specimens were produced from LD prefabricated CAD/CAM blocks and divided into three groups according to the surface treatment (n = 8): control, polishing, and glaze. Ceramic specimens were subjected to wear testing using a dual-axis chewing simulator. A 49-N load was applied in the axial direction combined with a lateral movement (1-mm path) using an LD spherical piston for a total of 106 cycles. Qualitative analysis of the wear surface was performed using an optical microscope. Quantitative analysis of surface roughness and volume loss was performed using a confocal microscope and a 3D-image editing software, respectively. Surface roughness and volume loss data were analyzed using Friedman's nonparametric statistical test for repeated measures and the Student-Newman-Keuls test (α = .050).

Results: There were statistical differences for surface roughness and volume loss of LD specimens in the different experimental conditions (P < .001). The control and polishing groups showed similar surface roughness and volume loss values for all testing times. The glaze group had greater wear volume after 103, 104, and 105 cycles. After 106 cycles, surface roughness and volume loss were similar in all groups. For the piston, surface roughness was similar over time and among groups.

Conclusions: A distinct wear behavior was found for glazed glass-ceramic specimens compared to control and polished specimens. At the end of the simulation, the surface roughness and volume loss was similar for the groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同表面处理方案对二硅酸锂微晶玻璃磨损行为的影响。
目的:本研究旨在评估不同整理方案对二硅酸锂微晶玻璃磨损行为的影响。材料和方法:样品由二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷预制CAD/CAM块制成,并根据表面处理(n=8)分为三组:对照组;抛光;釉使用双轴咀嚼模拟器对陶瓷样品进行磨损试验。使用二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷球形活塞在轴向方向上施加49N的载荷,并结合横向移动(1mm路径),总共106个循环。使用光学显微镜对磨损表面进行定性分析。分别使用共聚焦显微镜和3D图像编辑软件对表面粗糙度和体积损失进行定量分析。使用重复测量的Friedman非参数统计检验和Student Newman-Keuls检验(α=0.050)分析了表面粗糙度和体积损失数据所有测试时间的表面粗糙度和体积损失值。釉料组在103、104和105次循环后具有更大的磨损量。106次循环后,各组的表面粗糙度和体积损失相似。对于活塞,表面粗糙度随时间和组间相似。结论:与对照样品和抛光样品相比,上釉玻璃陶瓷样品具有明显的磨损行为。模拟结束时,各组的表面粗糙度和体积损失相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Food-Simulating Liquids on Hydrolytic Behavior of Resin Matrix Ceramics. A Pilot Study to Predict Lifetime of Resin-Based Materials for Denture: Presentation of an In Vitro Thermally-Accelerated Ageing Method. In Vitro Comparison of Surface Characteristics and Bacterial Adhesion in Composite Resin-Based Materials for Additive, Subtractive, and Conventional Manufacturing. Reference CAD-CAM Samples for Dental Shade Communication for Successful Aesthetic Outcome. An Investigation of Stress Distribution Between Two Different Implant Concept in Implant-Supported Maxillary Prostheses with Different Framework Materials: A Finite Element Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1