Immunoglobulin-G Antibodies against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome – Coronavirus-2 among Health-Care Workers: A Serosurveillance Study from India

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_516_21
Om Prakash, Bhavin Solanki, J. Sheth, H. Acharya, Swati Acharya, M. Vinzuda, Hari Patani
{"title":"Immunoglobulin-G Antibodies against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome – Coronavirus-2 among Health-Care Workers: A Serosurveillance Study from India","authors":"Om Prakash, Bhavin Solanki, J. Sheth, H. Acharya, Swati Acharya, M. Vinzuda, Hari Patani","doi":"10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_516_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Seropositivity among health-care workers (HCWs) may help in better understanding of the immune response after COVID-19 infection. Objectives: To estimate seropositivity among HCWs and to compare available variables with seropositivity to understand the factors affecting seropositivity. Materials and Methods: A serosurveillance among HCWs was carried out using population proportion sampling during the second half of October 2020 in the city of Ahmedabad using the Covid-Kavach (immunoglobulin G [IgG] ELISA Antibody testing kit). Simple proportions and appropriate statistical tests were used as needed. Results: As on October' 2020, HCWs in Ahmedabad demonstrated a seropositivity of 20.84% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.00–22.81%). Seropositivity among HCWs was lower than that of the general population (24.20%) which was estimated as part of the same study. Female HCWs had higher seropositivity 22.14% (95% CI 19.74–24.74%) as compared to 18.82% (95% CI 16.06–21.93%) among male HCWs and the difference was statistically not significant (Z = 1.66, P = 0.097). Age groups with increasing age show increasing trend in the seropositivity among HCWs. Conclusion: As on October 2020, with 20.84% seropositivity among HCWs in Ahmedabad, one in every five HCW already demonstrate IgG antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome– coronavirus-2. Further scientific studies on seropositivity and the factors affecting the seropositivity may be carried out to uncover more details of immune reaction after COVID-19 infection.","PeriodicalId":13727,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","volume":"18 19","pages":"18 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_516_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Seropositivity among health-care workers (HCWs) may help in better understanding of the immune response after COVID-19 infection. Objectives: To estimate seropositivity among HCWs and to compare available variables with seropositivity to understand the factors affecting seropositivity. Materials and Methods: A serosurveillance among HCWs was carried out using population proportion sampling during the second half of October 2020 in the city of Ahmedabad using the Covid-Kavach (immunoglobulin G [IgG] ELISA Antibody testing kit). Simple proportions and appropriate statistical tests were used as needed. Results: As on October' 2020, HCWs in Ahmedabad demonstrated a seropositivity of 20.84% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.00–22.81%). Seropositivity among HCWs was lower than that of the general population (24.20%) which was estimated as part of the same study. Female HCWs had higher seropositivity 22.14% (95% CI 19.74–24.74%) as compared to 18.82% (95% CI 16.06–21.93%) among male HCWs and the difference was statistically not significant (Z = 1.66, P = 0.097). Age groups with increasing age show increasing trend in the seropositivity among HCWs. Conclusion: As on October 2020, with 20.84% seropositivity among HCWs in Ahmedabad, one in every five HCW already demonstrate IgG antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome– coronavirus-2. Further scientific studies on seropositivity and the factors affecting the seropositivity may be carried out to uncover more details of immune reaction after COVID-19 infection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生保健工作者中抗严重急性呼吸综合征-冠状病毒-2的免疫球蛋白g抗体:来自印度的血清监测研究
背景:医护人员(HCW)的血清阳性可能有助于更好地了解新冠肺炎感染后的免疫反应。目的:评估HCW的血清阳性率,并将可用变量与血清阳性率进行比较,以了解影响血清阳性率的因素。材料和方法:2020年10月下半月,在艾哈迈达巴德市使用Covid-Kavach(免疫球蛋白G〔IgG〕ELISA抗体检测试剂盒),使用人口比例抽样对HCW进行血清监测。根据需要使用简单的比例和适当的统计检验。结果:截至2020年10月,艾哈迈达巴德的HCW血清阳性率为20.84%(95%置信区间[CI]19.00-22.81%)。HCW的血清阳性率低于同一研究中估计的普通人群(24.20%)。女性HCW的血清阳性率为22.14%(95%CI 19.74–24.74%),而男性HCW的阳性率为18.82%(95%CI 16.06–21.93%),差异无统计学意义(Z=1.66,P=0.097)。随着年龄的增长,年龄组的HCW血清阳性率呈上升趋势。结论:截至2020年10月,艾哈迈达巴德的HCW血清阳性率为20.84%,每五名HCW中就有一人已经表现出针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型的IgG抗体。可以对血清阳性率和影响血清阳性率的因素进行进一步的科学研究,以揭示新冠肺炎感染后免疫反应的更多细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Acquisition of Certifiable Competencies in Undergraduate Medical Curriculum of National Medical Commission: Role of Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice. Adapting a Longitudinal Structured Program to Enhance Research Skills in Undergraduate Medical Students: A Key Advancement in Competency-Based Medical Education. Assessing the Effectiveness of Student-generated Scenario-based Questions as a Tool for Active Learning. Challenges in Implementing Competency-based Medical Education in India - Stakeholders' Perspective: A Mixed-method Analysis. Comparative Analysis of Impact of Different Skill-training Methods among Medical Students: A Cross-sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1