Higher education between massification and quality

Rabah Noui
{"title":"Higher education between massification and quality","authors":"Rabah Noui","doi":"10.1108/heed-04-2020-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine how the policy of massification as a characteristic of the higher education system influences the quality of education? and what higher education model can the authors adopt to reconcile flow and quality?Design/methodology/approachThe methodology adopted is based on a questionnaire survey of a population of young graduates divided between graduates with a conventional license and LMD license, either in the process of preparing for a diploma or in unemployment or work. But also, the qualitative dimension which, although secondary in this survey, the authors mobilized it through the analysis of open questions relating to the perceptions and representations that young graduates have of their situations.FindingsThe higher education reforms are perceived differently by higher education actors. The results found show that university massification has had the opposite effect by training graduates doomed to unemployment and expatriation.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample for this study is very limited, the results of this finding cannot be generalized to the entire university student as a whole.Originality/valueThis study emphasizes the duality of flow and quality in higher education. The authors have shown the different perceptions of stakeholders in higher education and that despite the multiple reforms of this system the authors still cannot find the best model.","PeriodicalId":32842,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Evaluation and Development","volume":"89 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/heed-04-2020-0008","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Evaluation and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/heed-04-2020-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine how the policy of massification as a characteristic of the higher education system influences the quality of education? and what higher education model can the authors adopt to reconcile flow and quality?Design/methodology/approachThe methodology adopted is based on a questionnaire survey of a population of young graduates divided between graduates with a conventional license and LMD license, either in the process of preparing for a diploma or in unemployment or work. But also, the qualitative dimension which, although secondary in this survey, the authors mobilized it through the analysis of open questions relating to the perceptions and representations that young graduates have of their situations.FindingsThe higher education reforms are perceived differently by higher education actors. The results found show that university massification has had the opposite effect by training graduates doomed to unemployment and expatriation.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample for this study is very limited, the results of this finding cannot be generalized to the entire university student as a whole.Originality/valueThis study emphasizes the duality of flow and quality in higher education. The authors have shown the different perceptions of stakeholders in higher education and that despite the multiple reforms of this system the authors still cannot find the best model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育在大众化与质量化之间
目的本文的目的是研究大众化政策作为高等教育系统的一个特征是如何影响教育质量的。高等教育应该采用什么样的模式来协调流程与质量?设计/方法/方法采用的方法是基于对持有传统执照和LMD执照的年轻毕业生进行问卷调查,这些毕业生要么正在准备获得文凭,要么正在失业或工作。而且,定性的维度,虽然在本次调查中是次要的,但作者通过分析与年轻毕业生对其处境的看法和表征有关的开放问题,动员了它。高等教育参与者对高等教育改革的看法不同。结果发现,大学大众化培养的毕业生注定要失业和移居国外,产生了相反的效果。研究的局限性/意义本研究的样本非常有限,本研究的结果不能推广到整个大学生。创新/价值本研究强调高等教育中流动与质量的双重性。作者展示了高等教育中利益相关者的不同看法,尽管对这一制度进行了多次改革,但作者仍然没有找到最好的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ensuring bachelor’s thesis assessment quality: a case study at one Dutch research university Internationalization of quality assurance and the international quality of higher education in Taiwan Micro-credentials and reflections on higher education Exploring the possibilities and challenges in developing the Japanese qualifications framework Commentary: New education policy: shifting gears toward the future of India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1