Impact of acute geriatric services for nursing home residents on emergency department presentation and hospitalisation

S. L. Ling, Chia-Ti Cheng, Frank, Liu, D. Irwanto, F. Kohler, Matthew Smith, D. Chan
{"title":"Impact of acute geriatric services for nursing home residents on emergency department presentation and hospitalisation","authors":"S. L. Ling, Chia-Ti Cheng, Frank, Liu, D. Irwanto, F. Kohler, Matthew Smith, D. Chan","doi":"10.12809/ajgg-2017-276-oa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Prior to May 2015, our hospital provided only non-urgent geriatric services for nursing home residents. Thereafter, the Connecting Care Programme was introduced to provide acute geriatric services, including administration of intravenous antibiotics and fluids and a variety of other procedures. This audit aimed to investigate the impact of acute geriatric services for nursing home residents on emergency department presentation and hospitalisation. Methods. Medical records of nursing home residents who presented to the Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital before (from May to August 2014) and after (from May to August 2015) the Connecting Care Programme were retrospectively reviewed. The two groups were compared in terms of emergency department presentation and discharge rates. Results. Respectively for the group before and after the programme, of all presentations to the emergency department, 276 and 318 involved nursing home residents (6.1% vs 7.1%, p=0.056). Of these, 106 and 167 were discharged from the emergency department (38.4% vs 52.5%, odds ratio=1.76, 95% confidence interval=1.2-2.4, p=0.0008). The Connecting Care Programme increased the discharge rate in those with a diagnosis of fall without fracture (70% vs 88%, p=0.021), respiratory (11% vs 31%, p=0.020), gastrointestinal (34% vs 50%, p=0.025), or cardiovascular (24% vs 60%, p=0.010) complaints. Conclusion. The Connecting Care Programme resulted in an increased discharge rate and decreased hospital admission rate for nursing home residents who presented with fall without fracture, respiratory, gastrointestinal, or cardiovascular complaints. The programme may enable better utilisation of healthcare resources.","PeriodicalId":38338,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics","volume":"6 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12809/ajgg-2017-276-oa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background. Prior to May 2015, our hospital provided only non-urgent geriatric services for nursing home residents. Thereafter, the Connecting Care Programme was introduced to provide acute geriatric services, including administration of intravenous antibiotics and fluids and a variety of other procedures. This audit aimed to investigate the impact of acute geriatric services for nursing home residents on emergency department presentation and hospitalisation. Methods. Medical records of nursing home residents who presented to the Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital before (from May to August 2014) and after (from May to August 2015) the Connecting Care Programme were retrospectively reviewed. The two groups were compared in terms of emergency department presentation and discharge rates. Results. Respectively for the group before and after the programme, of all presentations to the emergency department, 276 and 318 involved nursing home residents (6.1% vs 7.1%, p=0.056). Of these, 106 and 167 were discharged from the emergency department (38.4% vs 52.5%, odds ratio=1.76, 95% confidence interval=1.2-2.4, p=0.0008). The Connecting Care Programme increased the discharge rate in those with a diagnosis of fall without fracture (70% vs 88%, p=0.021), respiratory (11% vs 31%, p=0.020), gastrointestinal (34% vs 50%, p=0.025), or cardiovascular (24% vs 60%, p=0.010) complaints. Conclusion. The Connecting Care Programme resulted in an increased discharge rate and decreased hospital admission rate for nursing home residents who presented with fall without fracture, respiratory, gastrointestinal, or cardiovascular complaints. The programme may enable better utilisation of healthcare resources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年急症护理服务对急诊科表现及住院的影响
背景。2015年5月之前,我院仅为养老院居民提供非紧急老年服务。此后,实施了连接护理方案,以提供急性老年服务,包括静脉注射抗生素和液体以及各种其他程序。本审计旨在调查急性老年护理服务对急诊科表现和住院的影响。方法。回顾性回顾了在连接护理计划之前(2014年5月至8月)和之后(2015年5月至8月)到bankown - lidcombe医院就诊的养老院居民的医疗记录。比较两组在急诊科的表现和出院率。结果。在计划之前和之后的小组中,所有到急诊科的报告中,276和318涉及养老院居民(6.1%对7.1%,p=0.056)。其中106例和167例从急诊科出院(38.4% vs 52.5%,优势比=1.76,95%可信区间=1.2 ~ 2.4,p=0.0008)。连接护理计划提高了诊断为跌倒无骨折的患者的出院率(70%对88%,p=0.021)、呼吸道疾病(11%对31%,p=0.020)、胃肠道疾病(34%对50%,p=0.025)或心血管疾病(24%对60%,p=0.010)。结论。“连接护理计划”提高了养老院居民的出院率,降低了住院率,这些人出现了跌倒,但没有骨折、呼吸系统、胃肠道或心血管疾病。该方案可使医疗资源得到更好的利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Asian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mortality and enrolment rates in end-of-life service for older adults in residential care homes Root caries prevalence among older adults in Miraj, India: a cross-sectional study Associations of length of stay with frailty status and COVID-19 disease severity among older adults at a community treatment facility in Singapore Occult hip fractures: should magnetic resonance imaging be the first-line investigation following negative radiographs? A case report Deep vein thrombosis secondary to May-Thurner syndrome in a 91-year-old woman: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1