The contribution of macroprudential policies to banks' resilience: Lessons from the systemic crises and the COVID-19 pandemic shock

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Finance Pub Date : 2023-07-15 DOI:10.1111/irfi.12424
Tiago F. A. Matos, João C. A. Teixeira, Tiago M. Dutra
{"title":"The contribution of macroprudential policies to banks' resilience: Lessons from the systemic crises and the COVID-19 pandemic shock","authors":"Tiago F. A. Matos,&nbsp;João C. A. Teixeira,&nbsp;Tiago M. Dutra","doi":"10.1111/irfi.12424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines the effectiveness of macroprudential policies in reducing the banks' risk during the COVID-19 pandemic and compares these results with the systemic banking crises years. Based on a sample of 624 banks across 40 countries during the period 2006–2020, we find that loosening capital-aimed macroprudential policies effectively reduced banks' risk during the COVID-19 pandemic, while this behavior led to increased risk during the systemic crises years. In contrast, tightening the remaining macroprudential policies during the systemic crises years and during the pandemic proved effective in reducing banks' risk. Furthermore, we show that the magnitude of the impact of macroprudential policies was stronger during the systemic crisis than that during the pandemic. Finally, we show that the results are driven by the capital requirement prudential policy, both during the systemic crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic, although the conservation buffer and the leverage limit also contributes to the ineffectiveness of these policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. The banks' leverage and loan growth also play an enhancing role of the effects of the macroprudential policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46664,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Finance","volume":"23 4","pages":"794-830"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irfi.12424","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of macroprudential policies in reducing the banks' risk during the COVID-19 pandemic and compares these results with the systemic banking crises years. Based on a sample of 624 banks across 40 countries during the period 2006–2020, we find that loosening capital-aimed macroprudential policies effectively reduced banks' risk during the COVID-19 pandemic, while this behavior led to increased risk during the systemic crises years. In contrast, tightening the remaining macroprudential policies during the systemic crises years and during the pandemic proved effective in reducing banks' risk. Furthermore, we show that the magnitude of the impact of macroprudential policies was stronger during the systemic crisis than that during the pandemic. Finally, we show that the results are driven by the capital requirement prudential policy, both during the systemic crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic, although the conservation buffer and the leverage limit also contributes to the ineffectiveness of these policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. The banks' leverage and loan growth also play an enhancing role of the effects of the macroprudential policies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宏观审慎政策对银行韧性的贡献:系统性危机和COVID - 19大流行冲击的教训
本研究考察了宏观审慎政策在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间降低银行风险方面的有效性,并将这些结果与系统性银行危机年份进行了比较。基于2006-2020年期间40个国家624家银行的样本,我们发现放松以资本为目标的宏观审慎政策有效降低了银行在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的风险,而这种行为导致系统性危机时期的风险增加。相比之下,在系统性危机时期和大流行期间,收紧剩余的宏观审慎政策被证明对降低银行风险是有效的。此外,我们表明宏观审慎政策的影响程度在系统性危机期间比在大流行期间更强。最后,我们表明,在系统性危机和COVID-19大流行期间,这一结果都受到资本要求审慎政策的推动,尽管保护性缓冲和杠杆限制也导致了这些政策在COVID-19大流行期间的无效。银行杠杆率和贷款增长对宏观审慎政策的效果也有增强作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Review of Finance
International Review of Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The International Review of Finance (IRF) publishes high-quality research on all aspects of financial economics, including traditional areas such as asset pricing, corporate finance, market microstructure, financial intermediation and regulation, financial econometrics, financial engineering and risk management, as well as new areas such as markets and institutions of emerging market economies, especially those in the Asia-Pacific region. In addition, the Letters Section in IRF is a premium outlet of letter-length research in all fields of finance. The length of the articles in the Letters Section is limited to a maximum of eight journal pages.
期刊最新文献
The impact of country level investor protection on economic policy uncertainty and corporate investment link Issue Information Trust in the retirement system and investment decisions of property investors Do passive investors influence corporate social responsibility? A risk‐management perspective The impact of democracy on liquidity and information asymmetry for NYSE cross‐listed stocks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1