Progress of disaster mitigation against tropical cyclones and storm surges: a comparative study of Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Japan

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Coastal Engineering Journal Pub Date : 2022-07-17 DOI:10.1080/21664250.2022.2100179
H. Takagi, LeDuc Anh, Rezuanul Islam, Tajnova Tanha Hossain
{"title":"Progress of disaster mitigation against tropical cyclones and storm surges: a comparative study of Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Japan","authors":"H. Takagi, LeDuc Anh, Rezuanul Islam, Tajnova Tanha Hossain","doi":"10.1080/21664250.2022.2100179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study reviews the progress of disaster mitigation measures against tropical cyclones (TCs) in three Asian countries with different historical, social, and economic backgrounds: Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Japan. In Bangladesh, an average of 6,600 people was killed by a single TC in the 1960s, but this number had decreased to 30 in the 2010s; this reduction was due to a clear improvement in soft measures, such as weather forecasting, warning systems, and mass evacuation coordinated by volunteers. In Vietnam, several strong TCs have recently made landfall, leading to improvements in national disaster management. Although Vietnam's current disaster management budget is smaller than those of the two other countries, large-scale evacuation by local authorities is believed to have minimized casualties. In Japan, shortly after Typhoon Vera in 1959, a comprehensive law on disaster prevention was enacted, and coastal dikes were constructed nationwide, resulting in a considerable reduction in fatalities due to TCs. However, the disaster prevention facilities built in this period are now deteriorating, while Japan’s budget for disaster management is projected to be decreasing. The three countries have advanced their disaster preparedness in response to past TCs and storm surges, but new challenges have also arisen.","PeriodicalId":50673,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Engineering Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21664250.2022.2100179","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study reviews the progress of disaster mitigation measures against tropical cyclones (TCs) in three Asian countries with different historical, social, and economic backgrounds: Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Japan. In Bangladesh, an average of 6,600 people was killed by a single TC in the 1960s, but this number had decreased to 30 in the 2010s; this reduction was due to a clear improvement in soft measures, such as weather forecasting, warning systems, and mass evacuation coordinated by volunteers. In Vietnam, several strong TCs have recently made landfall, leading to improvements in national disaster management. Although Vietnam's current disaster management budget is smaller than those of the two other countries, large-scale evacuation by local authorities is believed to have minimized casualties. In Japan, shortly after Typhoon Vera in 1959, a comprehensive law on disaster prevention was enacted, and coastal dikes were constructed nationwide, resulting in a considerable reduction in fatalities due to TCs. However, the disaster prevention facilities built in this period are now deteriorating, while Japan’s budget for disaster management is projected to be decreasing. The three countries have advanced their disaster preparedness in response to past TCs and storm surges, but new challenges have also arisen.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热带气旋和风暴潮减灾的进展:孟加拉国、越南和日本的比较研究
摘要:本研究综述了孟加拉国、越南和日本这三个具有不同历史、社会和经济背景的亚洲国家在热带气旋减灾措施方面的进展。在孟加拉国,20世纪60年代,平均有6600人死于一种TC,但这一数字在2010年代已降至30人;这一减少是由于软措施的明显改善,例如天气预报、预警系统和志愿者协调的大规模疏散。在越南,几次强台风最近登陆,导致国家灾害管理得到改善。虽然越南目前的灾害管理预算比另外两个国家要少,但据信,地方当局的大规模疏散将伤亡降到最低。1959年“维拉”台风发生后不久,日本就制定了全面的防灾法,在全国范围内修建了海岸堤坝,使台风造成的死亡人数大大减少。然而,在此期间建造的防灾设施现在正在恶化,而日本用于灾害管理的预算预计将减少。为应对过去的台风和风暴潮,这三个国家已经提高了备灾能力,但新的挑战也出现了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Coastal Engineering Journal
Coastal Engineering Journal 工程技术-工程:大洋
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Coastal Engineering Journal is a peer-reviewed medium for the publication of research achievements and engineering practices in the fields of coastal, harbor and offshore engineering. The CEJ editors welcome original papers and comprehensive reviews on waves and currents, sediment motion and morphodynamics, as well as on structures and facilities. Reports on conceptual developments and predictive methods of environmental processes are also published. Topics also include hard and soft technologies related to coastal zone development, shore protection, and prevention or mitigation of coastal disasters. The journal is intended to cover not only fundamental studies on analytical models, numerical computation and laboratory experiments, but also results of field measurements and case studies of real projects.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of climate change and climate variability impacts on coastal storms induced by extratropical cyclones: a case study of the August 2015 storm in central Chile Millennial and contemporary dynamics of the barrier estuary entrance at Moruya, SE Australia An automatic shoreline extraction method from SAR imagery using DeepLab-v3+ and its versatility Long-term erosion at the north of Hatiya Island in the Lower Meghna Estuary, Bangladesh Performance Evaluation of XBeach for Seawater-Aquifer Interaction Simulation in Swash Zone of Gravel Beach: An Attempt to Reduce the Phase Errors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1