The Common European Investment Policy and Its Perspectives in the Context of the Achmea Case Law

Daniela Nováčková, T. Peráček
{"title":"The Common European Investment Policy and Its Perspectives in the Context of the Achmea Case Law","authors":"Daniela Nováčková, T. Peráček","doi":"10.2478/bjes-2021-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Current developments in the field of international investment relations are influenced by the ruling of the Court of Justice in the Achmea case, when de facto European law became superior to international law. The verdict of the Court of Justice changes the usual legal procedures and customs in the field of bilateral investment agreements. However, the impact of this court decision is an almost unexplored area due to the lack of interest of legal theorists, and it is relatively difficult to find answers to the ambiguities and problems that have arisen. The scientific study analyses the current process of introducing new rules in the field of investment policy within the European Union, which means the end of bilateral investment agreements within the European Union. It also examines the European Union’s activities in the field of foreign direct investment and the development of a stable European investment policy. Determining the goal of the scientific study is based directly on current needs and emerging practical problems in practice. Their correct understanding and application has a fundamental impact on the possibilities of rules in the field of investment policy. Due to the nature of the researched topic, we applied selected qualitative methods suitable for recognising the law. However, we also analysed scientific literature, case-law and the analogy of law, thus providing qualified answers to the application pitfalls of legal practice.","PeriodicalId":29836,"journal":{"name":"TalTech Journal of European Studies","volume":"30 5","pages":"153 - 169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TalTech Journal of European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Current developments in the field of international investment relations are influenced by the ruling of the Court of Justice in the Achmea case, when de facto European law became superior to international law. The verdict of the Court of Justice changes the usual legal procedures and customs in the field of bilateral investment agreements. However, the impact of this court decision is an almost unexplored area due to the lack of interest of legal theorists, and it is relatively difficult to find answers to the ambiguities and problems that have arisen. The scientific study analyses the current process of introducing new rules in the field of investment policy within the European Union, which means the end of bilateral investment agreements within the European Union. It also examines the European Union’s activities in the field of foreign direct investment and the development of a stable European investment policy. Determining the goal of the scientific study is based directly on current needs and emerging practical problems in practice. Their correct understanding and application has a fundamental impact on the possibilities of rules in the field of investment policy. Due to the nature of the researched topic, we applied selected qualitative methods suitable for recognising the law. However, we also analysed scientific literature, case-law and the analogy of law, thus providing qualified answers to the application pitfalls of legal practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Achmea判例法背景下的欧洲共同投资政策及其展望
国际投资关系领域的当前发展受到法院在阿赫梅亚案中裁决的影响,当时事实上的欧洲法优于国际法。法院的判决改变了双边投资协定领域的通常法律程序和惯例。然而,由于法律理论家缺乏兴趣,这一法院判决的影响几乎是一个未被探索的领域,对于已经出现的歧义和问题,找到答案相对困难。这项科学研究分析了目前在欧盟投资政策领域引入新规则的过程,这意味着欧盟内部双边投资协定的结束。报告还审查了欧洲联盟在外国直接投资领域的活动和制定稳定的欧洲投资政策的情况。科学研究目标的确定直接基于当前的需求和实践中出现的实际问题。它们的正确理解和应用对投资政策领域规则的可能性具有根本性的影响。由于研究课题的性质,我们选择了适合识别规律的定性方法。然而,我们也分析了科学文献、判例法和法律类比,从而为法律实践中的适用陷阱提供了合格的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
62.50%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Threats to Diversity of Opinion and Freedom of Expression via Social Media Selected Legal Issues in Online Adult Education: Compliance of Online Learning and Teaching Process with GDPR Evolution of the European Union Development Policy towards India Divorce at the Notary: Protection of Creditors’ Interests Evolution of the Digital Economy and Society Index in the European Union: Α Socioeconomic Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1