Markowitz Portfolios with Graham Bands in the Accumulation Phase

P. Hagelstein, I. Lackner, J. Otto, A. Perona, R. Piziak
{"title":"Markowitz Portfolios with Graham Bands in the Accumulation Phase","authors":"P. Hagelstein, I. Lackner, J. Otto, A. Perona, R. Piziak","doi":"10.3905/jwm.2019.1.084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the authors consider historical real returns of tax-exempt portfolios consisting of equities and short-term bonds over 90 different 30-year time periods from 1900 to 2018, in which fixed real contributions were made to the portfolios annually. Two main types of portfolios are considered. The first is a “Markowitz portfolio” in which the investor annually contributed evenly between equities and bonds and never rebalanced the portfolio. The second is a “Markowitz portfolio with Graham bands,” in which the investor annually contributed evenly between equities and bonds but rebalanced the portfolio to an overall 50/50 allocation whenever the equity or the bond portion of the portfolio exceeded 75% of the overall portfolio value. The authors also consider analogous results when short-term bonds were replaced by less-liquid guaranteed income instruments, such as TIAA Traditional, providing higher yields. These results are intended to provide useful historical data to assist investors in the accumulation phase and their advisors in asset allocation decisions. TOPICS: Portfolio theory, portfolio construction, equity portfolio management Key Findings • Historically, investors in a thirty-year accumulation phase have done well by contributing half of their investments in an index fund modeling the S&P 500 and the other half in short-term government securities; never rebalancing. In this article, such a portfolio is called a “Markowitz portfolio.” • Investors in a thirty-year accumulation phase have also historically done well by contributing half of their investments to an S&P index fund and the other half to short-term government securities; rebalancing the portfolio back to a 50/50 allocation whenever either the equity or the bond portion of the portfolio exceeded 75% of the overall value. Such an investment strategy is consistent with one advocated by Benjamin Graham. However, such rebalancing has had a historical tendency to provide portfolio returns lower than that of the Markowitz portfolio indicated above. • Since 1900, investors implementing either of the above two strategies, when contributing annually a constant real value to their portfolios, never had in the accumulation phase the bond portion exceed 75% of the overall portfolio value. Hence, investors sympathetic to either of the above allocations might wish to consider placing the bond portion of their portfolios into less-liquid instruments typically providing a higher yield. Historically, such investment modification has provided improved returns.","PeriodicalId":39998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wealth Management","volume":"111 15","pages":"41 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wealth Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2019.1.084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, the authors consider historical real returns of tax-exempt portfolios consisting of equities and short-term bonds over 90 different 30-year time periods from 1900 to 2018, in which fixed real contributions were made to the portfolios annually. Two main types of portfolios are considered. The first is a “Markowitz portfolio” in which the investor annually contributed evenly between equities and bonds and never rebalanced the portfolio. The second is a “Markowitz portfolio with Graham bands,” in which the investor annually contributed evenly between equities and bonds but rebalanced the portfolio to an overall 50/50 allocation whenever the equity or the bond portion of the portfolio exceeded 75% of the overall portfolio value. The authors also consider analogous results when short-term bonds were replaced by less-liquid guaranteed income instruments, such as TIAA Traditional, providing higher yields. These results are intended to provide useful historical data to assist investors in the accumulation phase and their advisors in asset allocation decisions. TOPICS: Portfolio theory, portfolio construction, equity portfolio management Key Findings • Historically, investors in a thirty-year accumulation phase have done well by contributing half of their investments in an index fund modeling the S&P 500 and the other half in short-term government securities; never rebalancing. In this article, such a portfolio is called a “Markowitz portfolio.” • Investors in a thirty-year accumulation phase have also historically done well by contributing half of their investments to an S&P index fund and the other half to short-term government securities; rebalancing the portfolio back to a 50/50 allocation whenever either the equity or the bond portion of the portfolio exceeded 75% of the overall value. Such an investment strategy is consistent with one advocated by Benjamin Graham. However, such rebalancing has had a historical tendency to provide portfolio returns lower than that of the Markowitz portfolio indicated above. • Since 1900, investors implementing either of the above two strategies, when contributing annually a constant real value to their portfolios, never had in the accumulation phase the bond portion exceed 75% of the overall portfolio value. Hence, investors sympathetic to either of the above allocations might wish to consider placing the bond portion of their portfolios into less-liquid instruments typically providing a higher yield. Historically, such investment modification has provided improved returns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Markowitz与Graham Bands在积累阶段的投资组合
在这篇文章中,作者考虑了1900年至2018年90个不同的30年时间段内由股票和短期债券组成的免税投资组合的历史实际回报,其中每年对投资组合的实际贡献是固定的。主要考虑两种类型的投资组合。第一种是“马科维茨投资组合”,投资者每年在股票和债券之间平均投资,从不重新平衡投资组合。第二种是“马科维茨格雷厄姆波段投资组合”,在这种投资组合中,投资者每年在股票和债券之间平均投资,但当投资组合中的股票或债券部分超过总投资组合价值的75%时,就会重新平衡投资组合,使其整体配置达到50/50。作者还考虑了当短期债券被流动性较差的保证收益工具(如TIAA Traditional)取代时的类似结果,这些工具提供了更高的收益率。这些结果旨在提供有用的历史数据,以帮助投资者在积累阶段和他们的顾问在资产配置决策。•从历史上看,在30年的积累阶段,投资者通过将一半的投资投入标准普尔500指数基金,另一半投资于短期政府证券,取得了很好的成绩;永远不会再平衡。在本文中,这样的投资组合被称为“马科维茨投资组合”。•在30年累积阶段的投资者,将一半投资于标准普尔指数基金,另一半投资于短期政府证券,从历史上看,他们的表现也不错;当投资组合中的股票或债券部分超过整体价值的75%时,将投资组合重新调整为50/50分配。这种投资策略与本杰明•格雷厄姆(Benjamin Graham)所倡导的策略是一致的。然而,这种再平衡的历史趋势是提供的投资组合回报低于上述马科维茨投资组合。•自1900年以来,实施上述两种策略中的任何一种的投资者,当每年为其投资组合贡献恒定的实际价值时,在累积阶段,债券部分从未超过整体投资组合价值的75%。因此,支持上述配置的投资者可能希望考虑将其投资组合中的债券部分投资于流动性较差的工具,这些工具通常提供更高的收益率。从历史上看,这种投资调整提供了更高的回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wealth Management
Journal of Wealth Management Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
The Safe-Haven and Hedging Properties of Agricultural Commodities Editor’s Letter Adding Art to Your Portfolio: A New Risk Assessment Framework Corporate Ownership of Fine Art: Firm Valuation, Societal Impacts, and Philanthropy Asset Allocation—Commodities or Commodity Stocks?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1