Book Review

IF 0.6 Q2 AREA STUDIES Japan Forum Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI:10.1080/09555803.2022.2140181
Christopher P. Hood
{"title":"Book Review","authors":"Christopher P. Hood","doi":"10.1080/09555803.2022.2140181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For many of us, we can remember exactly where we were on 11 March 2011. Whether we were in Japan or elsewhere, within minutes of the mega earthquake striking, images of what was occurring were being broadcast globally. We watched, shocked, unable to find the right words as the tsunami rolled into and over the coastline. Over the ensuing hours, we tried to learn more about what had happened, in general terms, but also, often, at a micro level to those we knew. As the day went on, so the initial disaster seemed to have peaked, and attention could largely start turning to thinking about survival and recovery. But, of course, the disaster was not over. The third element was still building to its explosive contribution to the Great East Japan Earthquake and Disaster the following day in the form of the events at the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant. In the days, months, and years, many of us grappled to understand what had really happened during the days, weeks, and longer of the disaster. For the disaster did not even end on 12 March. Indeed, it is questionable whether it has ended even now in 2022. While disaster studies had remained an ominously under-studied area of Japanese studies prior to 2011, in the years that followed, many academic studies have been published. Without doubt, as someone who had been working on disasters prior to the events of 2011, Aldrich’s expertise and contribution to this body of literature is a useful addition in the form of this book. But this conclusion comes with caveats. Returning to the first paragraph of this review, as noted, many of us remember the events of 2011. But, for more and more students, amongst others, the memories are not so clear and there may be little or knowledge of the events. Outside Japanese Studies, the problem may be even greater. In that respect, Aldrich’s study will be extremely useful. However, I wonder whether they will even find the study. The main title of the book is ‘Black Wave’, a term which resonates so much with us who watched the images of the tsunami as it poured over walls, roads, and fields. Without that knowledge, however, it sounds more like a cultural counterpart to the ‘Korean Wave’. While the subtitle helps, beyond the Japanese Studies community, ‘3/11’ is not wellknown, so I fear that it may not reach those who would benefit from reading it. Further, the image of a crane and","PeriodicalId":44495,"journal":{"name":"Japan Forum","volume":"8 4","pages":"242 - 244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2022.2140181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For many of us, we can remember exactly where we were on 11 March 2011. Whether we were in Japan or elsewhere, within minutes of the mega earthquake striking, images of what was occurring were being broadcast globally. We watched, shocked, unable to find the right words as the tsunami rolled into and over the coastline. Over the ensuing hours, we tried to learn more about what had happened, in general terms, but also, often, at a micro level to those we knew. As the day went on, so the initial disaster seemed to have peaked, and attention could largely start turning to thinking about survival and recovery. But, of course, the disaster was not over. The third element was still building to its explosive contribution to the Great East Japan Earthquake and Disaster the following day in the form of the events at the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant. In the days, months, and years, many of us grappled to understand what had really happened during the days, weeks, and longer of the disaster. For the disaster did not even end on 12 March. Indeed, it is questionable whether it has ended even now in 2022. While disaster studies had remained an ominously under-studied area of Japanese studies prior to 2011, in the years that followed, many academic studies have been published. Without doubt, as someone who had been working on disasters prior to the events of 2011, Aldrich’s expertise and contribution to this body of literature is a useful addition in the form of this book. But this conclusion comes with caveats. Returning to the first paragraph of this review, as noted, many of us remember the events of 2011. But, for more and more students, amongst others, the memories are not so clear and there may be little or knowledge of the events. Outside Japanese Studies, the problem may be even greater. In that respect, Aldrich’s study will be extremely useful. However, I wonder whether they will even find the study. The main title of the book is ‘Black Wave’, a term which resonates so much with us who watched the images of the tsunami as it poured over walls, roads, and fields. Without that knowledge, however, it sounds more like a cultural counterpart to the ‘Korean Wave’. While the subtitle helps, beyond the Japanese Studies community, ‘3/11’ is not wellknown, so I fear that it may not reach those who would benefit from reading it. Further, the image of a crane and
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评
对于我们中的许多人来说,我们都能准确地记得2011年3月11日那天我们在哪里。无论我们是在日本还是其他地方,在大地震发生的几分钟内,正在发生的图像就在全球范围内播出。当海啸席卷海岸线时,我们震惊地看着,找不到合适的语言。在接下来的几个小时里,我们试图从总体上了解更多发生的事情,但也经常在微观层面上了解我们认识的人。随着时间的推移,最初的灾难似乎达到了顶峰,人们的注意力开始转向思考生存和恢复。当然,灾难还没有结束。第三个因素仍在以第二天福岛第一核电站事件的形式对东日本大地震和灾难做出爆炸性贡献。在几天、几个月、几年的时间里,我们中的许多人都在努力理解灾难发生后的几天、几周甚至更长时间里到底发生了什么。因为灾难甚至没有在3月12日结束。事实上,即使到了2022年,它是否已经结束也值得怀疑。虽然在2011年之前,灾难研究在日本研究中仍然是一个研究不足的领域,但在随后的几年里,许多学术研究已经发表。毫无疑问,作为一个在2011年之前就一直从事灾难研究的人,奥尔德里奇的专业知识和对这一文学体系的贡献对这本书来说是一个有益的补充。但这个结论也有一些需要注意的地方。回到回顾的第一段,如前所述,我们中的许多人都记得2011年发生的事件。但是,对于越来越多的学生来说,他们的记忆并不那么清晰,对这些事件可能知之甚少。在日本研究之外,问题可能更大。在这方面,奥尔德里奇的研究将非常有用。然而,我怀疑他们是否会找到这项研究。这本书的主要标题是“黑色浪潮”,当我们看到海啸淹没墙壁、道路和田野时,这个词与我们产生了很大的共鸣。然而,如果没有这些知识,它听起来更像是“韩流”的文化对应。虽然副标题有所帮助,但在日本研究界之外,“3/11”并不为人所知,所以我担心它可能不会触及那些想从阅读中受益的人。此外,起重机的形象和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Japan Forum
Japan Forum AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Hey! Say Ishin: Ōmae Ken’ichi’s and Hashimoto Tōru’s policy entrepreneurship and the neoliberal reorientation of contemporary Ishin politics Shakaijin, shadow education, & the entrepreneurial self: fabricating personhood in neoliberal Japan Eight Dogs, or Hakkenden, Part Two—His Master’s Blade The Work of Gender: Service, Performance and Fantasy in Contemporary Japan Tokyo Jazz Joints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1