Challenges and Possibilities of Memory and Reconciliation: Empirical Evidence for Colombia

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL ISSUES Revista De Estudios Sociales Pub Date : 2022-11-15 DOI:10.7440/res83.2023.08
Rosaura Arrieta-Flórez, Katleen Marún Uparela, Silvana Torres-Pacheco
{"title":"Challenges and Possibilities of Memory and Reconciliation: Empirical Evidence for Colombia","authors":"Rosaura Arrieta-Flórez, Katleen Marún Uparela, Silvana Torres-Pacheco","doi":"10.7440/res83.2023.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"| The signing of the peace agreement with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia-People’s Army (FARC-EP) deepened the debate on the reconstruction of memory as a right of the victims and a way to advance in the reconciliation of Colombian society. This article uses data from the 2019 Colombian Reconciliation Barometer of the Program of Alliances for Reconciliation of the United States Agency for International Development and ACDI/VOCA to analyze the individual and contextual factors that affect how individuals perceive the reconstruction of memory as a tool that contributes to reconciliation. We estimated a probabilistic model for which the dependent variable is the predisposition toward memory reconstruction as a predictor of reconciliation based on the context of the Colombian armed conflict, and a set of individual factors that capture the effects of community initiatives and state institutions and programs arising within the framework of transitional justice. We sought to verify whether the characteristics of individuals and their way of relating to each other in a community and municipal context shape the perception of the contribution of reconstructed memory to reconciliation. The results show that being a female victim of the armed conflict, developing empathy, residing in municipalities with the presence of Places of Memory, and trusting in the processes of transitional justice —such as clarifying the truth— increase an individual’s predisposition to consider that the reconstruction of memory contributes to reconciliation. In contrast, other policies and programs that emerged after the agreement, such as residing in municipalities with Territorially Focused Development Plans (PDET in Spanish) and the presence of Casas de Verdad (Truth Houses), operate in the opposite direction. This work suggests challenges for transitional justice by identifying the factors that condition positive outlooks toward the reconstruction of memory in reconciliation processes and opens the possibility of formulating actions with greater citizen acceptance.","PeriodicalId":46119,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Estudios Sociales","volume":"24 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Estudios Sociales","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7440/res83.2023.08","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

| The signing of the peace agreement with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia-People’s Army (FARC-EP) deepened the debate on the reconstruction of memory as a right of the victims and a way to advance in the reconciliation of Colombian society. This article uses data from the 2019 Colombian Reconciliation Barometer of the Program of Alliances for Reconciliation of the United States Agency for International Development and ACDI/VOCA to analyze the individual and contextual factors that affect how individuals perceive the reconstruction of memory as a tool that contributes to reconciliation. We estimated a probabilistic model for which the dependent variable is the predisposition toward memory reconstruction as a predictor of reconciliation based on the context of the Colombian armed conflict, and a set of individual factors that capture the effects of community initiatives and state institutions and programs arising within the framework of transitional justice. We sought to verify whether the characteristics of individuals and their way of relating to each other in a community and municipal context shape the perception of the contribution of reconstructed memory to reconciliation. The results show that being a female victim of the armed conflict, developing empathy, residing in municipalities with the presence of Places of Memory, and trusting in the processes of transitional justice —such as clarifying the truth— increase an individual’s predisposition to consider that the reconstruction of memory contributes to reconciliation. In contrast, other policies and programs that emerged after the agreement, such as residing in municipalities with Territorially Focused Development Plans (PDET in Spanish) and the presence of Casas de Verdad (Truth Houses), operate in the opposite direction. This work suggests challenges for transitional justice by identifying the factors that condition positive outlooks toward the reconstruction of memory in reconciliation processes and opens the possibility of formulating actions with greater citizen acceptance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
记忆与和解的挑战和可能性:哥伦比亚的经验证据
|与哥伦比亚革命武装力量人民军签署的和平协议加深了关于重建记忆作为受害者权利和促进哥伦比亚社会和解的一种方式的辩论。本文使用美国国际开发署和解联盟项目2019年哥伦比亚和解晴雨表和ACDI/VOCA的数据,分析了影响个人如何将记忆重建视为有助于和解的工具的个人和背景因素。根据哥伦比亚武装冲突的背景,我们估计了一个概率模型,其中因变量是记忆重建的倾向,作为和解的预测因素,以及一组个人因素,这些因素捕捉了过渡司法框架内出现的社区倡议、国家机构和计划的影响。我们试图验证个人的特征及其在社区和城市背景下相互联系的方式是否影响了重建记忆对和解的贡献。研究结果表明,作为武装冲突的女性受害者,发展同理心,居住在有记忆之地的城市,并信任过渡时期的司法过程,如澄清真相,会增加个人认为重建记忆有助于和解的倾向。相比之下,协议后出现的其他政策和计划,如居住在有以领土为重点的发展计划的市镇(西班牙语为PDET)和Casas de Verdad(真相之家),则朝着相反的方向运作。这项工作表明,过渡时期司法面临挑战,因为它确定了在和解进程中重建记忆的积极前景的因素,并为制定公民接受度更高的行动开辟了可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Estudios Sociales (rev. estud.soc.) is an indexed publication of a periodical nature, which adheres to international standards of quality, positioning, periodicity and availability on line. Its objective is to contribute to the dissemination of the research, analyses and opinions that the national and international academic community elaborates. As a social sciences journal, it publishes the results of investigations, reflections on relevant topics, theoretical revisions and reviews, which contribute to pertinent debates about sociological, historical, anthropological, cultural and gender study subjects, as well as articles on political science, philosophy, psychology and education. Is a quarterly publication (January-March, April-June, July-September, October-December) that comes out at the beginning of each of these periods, created in1998 and funded by the School of Social Sciences of the Universidad de los Andes (Colombia). All of its digital contents are of open access through its website. The printed version has a cost and may be acquired at specific outlets. The Journal publisehs articles in Spanish, English and Portuguese.
期刊最新文献
“Es que todo está vivo simultáneamente”. Memoria y perdón como rearmonización del territorio entre los pueblos que conforman el Consejo Regional Indígena del Cauca, Colombia Vivir las injusticias globales como personales: los jóvenes alteractivistas Perdón y memoria: oportunidades para la reconciliación. Una introducción Perdón y resiliencia: reflexiones desde las experiencias de víctimas del conflicto armado colombiano en San Juan Nepomuceno, Montes de María, Colombia Ciudadanos del común y construcción de paz. Creencias sociales sobre el perdón, la justicia y la reconciliación en Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1