How history can inform corporate responsibility: the statutory rule of profit allocation

IF 0.9 Q4 MANAGEMENT Journal of Management History Pub Date : 2022-04-18 DOI:10.1108/jmh-10-2021-0054
Emilie Bonhoure
{"title":"How history can inform corporate responsibility: the statutory rule of profit allocation","authors":"Emilie Bonhoure","doi":"10.1108/jmh-10-2021-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to present how a historical governance mechanism (a statutory rule of profit allocation) could answer the practical question of profit allocation, thereby proposing a methodology to enhance future quantitative studies.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe rule sets profit allocations to a predetermined set of stakeholders in corporate charters. It could be seen as a tool used by historical organisations to enact corporate social responsibility (CSR). The authors propose a straightforward way to calculate the payout ratios promised by this rule to each stakeholder. This methodology was applied to shareholders and used to calculate the promised dividend payout ratios.\n\n\nFindings\nThis rule constitutes a natural experiment from which modern organisations could learn to implement the most relevant profit-allocation schemes given their CSR strategy. The authors propose calculating a promised payout ratio that would allow scholars to empirically examine the rule and its effects and provide accurate recommendations to these organisations.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis mechanism allows the study of profit allocations made to stakeholders (not limited to shareholders or employees like it is usually done). The promised payout ratio makes future quantitative investigations possible.\n\n\nPractical implications\nModern organisations could use the CSR mechanism to allocate profits continuously in formats that would best fit their strategy and environment.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first article to examine the statutory rule of profit allocation per se, which proposes a new methodology to calculate payout ratios promised by the rule. The idea is to investigate their impact and provide recommendations for modern organisations to adapt.\n","PeriodicalId":45819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management History","volume":"72 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmh-10-2021-0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to present how a historical governance mechanism (a statutory rule of profit allocation) could answer the practical question of profit allocation, thereby proposing a methodology to enhance future quantitative studies. Design/methodology/approach The rule sets profit allocations to a predetermined set of stakeholders in corporate charters. It could be seen as a tool used by historical organisations to enact corporate social responsibility (CSR). The authors propose a straightforward way to calculate the payout ratios promised by this rule to each stakeholder. This methodology was applied to shareholders and used to calculate the promised dividend payout ratios. Findings This rule constitutes a natural experiment from which modern organisations could learn to implement the most relevant profit-allocation schemes given their CSR strategy. The authors propose calculating a promised payout ratio that would allow scholars to empirically examine the rule and its effects and provide accurate recommendations to these organisations. Research limitations/implications This mechanism allows the study of profit allocations made to stakeholders (not limited to shareholders or employees like it is usually done). The promised payout ratio makes future quantitative investigations possible. Practical implications Modern organisations could use the CSR mechanism to allocate profits continuously in formats that would best fit their strategy and environment. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first article to examine the statutory rule of profit allocation per se, which proposes a new methodology to calculate payout ratios promised by the rule. The idea is to investigate their impact and provide recommendations for modern organisations to adapt.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史如何告知企业责任:利润分配的法定规则
本研究旨在探讨历史治理机制(利润分配的法定规则)如何回答利润分配的实际问题,从而提出一种方法,以加强未来的定量研究。设计/方法/方法该规则将利润分配给公司章程中预先确定的一组利益相关者。它可以被视为历史悠久的组织用来制定企业社会责任(CSR)的工具。作者提出了一种简单的方法来计算该规则向每个利益相关者承诺的支付比率。这种方法适用于股东,并用于计算承诺的股息支付比率。这条规则构成了一个自然的实验,现代组织可以从中学习实施最相关的利润分配方案,以满足其企业社会责任战略。作者建议计算一个承诺的支付比率,这将使学者们能够实证地检验该规则及其影响,并向这些组织提供准确的建议。研究局限/启示这种机制允许研究利益相关者的利润分配(不限于股东或员工,就像它通常做的那样)。承诺的支付比率使未来的定量调查成为可能。现代组织可以利用企业社会责任机制,以最适合其战略和环境的形式持续分配利润。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一篇研究利润分配法定规则本身的文章,它提出了一种新的方法来计算该规则所承诺的派息率。其目的是调查它们的影响,并为现代组织提供适应建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the intellectual nexus between Peirce’s synechism and Goldratt’s theory of constraints: insights for management and organization studies Back to roots! The singular introduction of statutory auditing in France, Germany and Great Britain (1844–1935) Rooting firm responsibility in social-ecological systems through ancient Nahua thought: rethinking the logic model in the global reporting initiative The troubled establishment of the Tourist Hotel Corporation of New Zealand Boundary spanning activities and resource orchestration as microfoundations of dynamic capability: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1