Reorienting Ozu: A Master and His Influence ed. by Jinhee Choi (review)

Q4 Arts and Humanities Film and History Pub Date : 2022-01-03 DOI:10.1353/flm.2021.0014
J. McGuire
{"title":"Reorienting Ozu: A Master and His Influence ed. by Jinhee Choi (review)","authors":"J. McGuire","doi":"10.1353/flm.2021.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like other historical figures, filmmakers tend to be slotted into perhaps restrictive historiographical niches. Yasujiro Ozu now stands as one of the most acclaimed writer-directors of the twentieth century, with his 1953 film Tokyo Story (Tokyo monogatari) safely nestled in the top five of Sight & Sound’s influential “The Greatest Films of All Time” survey. Yet his overall work seems to suffer from categorical oversimplification; his famous “tatami shot” films are said to embody a Flaubertian filmic representation of domestic familial life, as contrasted to the grandiose, more Tolstoyian interpretation of the world, as exhibited by Ozu’s Japanese contemporary, Akira Kurosawa. A closer look at both filmmakers’ work, however, reveals a more protean reality: Ozu also made comedies, while Kurosawa diversified with literary adaptations (The Idiot) and crime dramas (Drunken Angel). This book tries to remedy this situation through its multifarious viewpoints of Ozu, and it mostly succeeds. Reorienting Ozu is divided into three parts: “Branding Ozu,” which encompasses contemporary theoretical and discursive frameworks about the Japanese filmmaker; “Historicizing Ozu,” which examines overlooked films in Ozu’s oeuvre; and “Tracking Ozu,” which identifies his influence on contemporary filmmakers. The first section represents the weakest part in reorienting its subject. While the first four chapters, which explain the recent examinations of Ozu’s work by Japanese critic Shigehiko Hasumi and the conscious homage in Taiwanese filmmaker Hsaio-hsien Hou’s Café Lumiere (2003), demonstrate that an overemphasis on","PeriodicalId":53571,"journal":{"name":"Film and History","volume":"233 ","pages":"50 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Film and History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/flm.2021.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Like other historical figures, filmmakers tend to be slotted into perhaps restrictive historiographical niches. Yasujiro Ozu now stands as one of the most acclaimed writer-directors of the twentieth century, with his 1953 film Tokyo Story (Tokyo monogatari) safely nestled in the top five of Sight & Sound’s influential “The Greatest Films of All Time” survey. Yet his overall work seems to suffer from categorical oversimplification; his famous “tatami shot” films are said to embody a Flaubertian filmic representation of domestic familial life, as contrasted to the grandiose, more Tolstoyian interpretation of the world, as exhibited by Ozu’s Japanese contemporary, Akira Kurosawa. A closer look at both filmmakers’ work, however, reveals a more protean reality: Ozu also made comedies, while Kurosawa diversified with literary adaptations (The Idiot) and crime dramas (Drunken Angel). This book tries to remedy this situation through its multifarious viewpoints of Ozu, and it mostly succeeds. Reorienting Ozu is divided into three parts: “Branding Ozu,” which encompasses contemporary theoretical and discursive frameworks about the Japanese filmmaker; “Historicizing Ozu,” which examines overlooked films in Ozu’s oeuvre; and “Tracking Ozu,” which identifies his influence on contemporary filmmakers. The first section represents the weakest part in reorienting its subject. While the first four chapters, which explain the recent examinations of Ozu’s work by Japanese critic Shigehiko Hasumi and the conscious homage in Taiwanese filmmaker Hsaio-hsien Hou’s Café Lumiere (2003), demonstrate that an overemphasis on
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新定位小津:一个大师和他的影响,崔镇熙主编(评论)
与其他历史人物一样,电影制作人往往被归入可能限制性的史学领域。小津康次郎(Yasujiro Ozu)现在是20世纪最受赞誉的编剧兼导演之一,他1953年的电影《东京故事》(Tokyo Story,Tokyo monoatari)在Sight&Sound颇具影响力的“有史以来最伟大的电影”调查中稳居前五。然而,他的整体作品似乎过于简单化;据说,他著名的“榻榻米镜头”电影体现了福楼拜式的家庭生活电影表现,与小津的日本同时代人黑泽明对世界的宏大、更像托尔斯泰式的诠释形成鲜明对比。然而,仔细观察这两位电影制作人的作品,就会发现一个更为多变的现实:小津也制作了喜剧,而黑泽明则通过改编文学作品(《白痴》)和犯罪剧(《醉天使》)实现了多样化。本书试图通过对小津的各种观点来弥补这种情况,并取得了很大的成功。《重新定位小津》分为三个部分:《品牌化小津》,包含了关于这位日本电影制作人的当代理论和话语框架;“小津的历史化”,它审视了小津作品中被忽视的电影;以及《追踪小津》(Tracking Ozu),该片确定了小津对当代电影制作人的影响。第一部分代表了在重新定位主题方面最薄弱的部分。前四章解释了日本评论家长须茂(Shigehiko Hasumi)最近对小津作品的审视,以及台湾电影制作人侯赛贤(Hsaio hsien Hou)的《卢米埃尔咖啡馆》(CaféLumiere,2003)中有意识的致敬,这表明过度强调
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Film and History
Film and History Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
The Private Secretary dir. by Wilhelm Thiele (review) Rescued from Amnesia: Political Afterlives of the 1980s Chicano Wave Motion Pictures and Moral Panic: The Reception of 'White Slavery' Films in New York in 1913 Ruination and Redemption in Billy Wilder's Romantic Comedies Greta Garbo: Siren of the Close-up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1