Atheism, Social Networks and Health: A Review and Theoretical Model

IF 1.7 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Secularism & Nonreligion Pub Date : 2019-10-16 DOI:10.5334/snr.101
Kevin McCaffree
{"title":"Atheism, Social Networks and Health: A Review and Theoretical Model","authors":"Kevin McCaffree","doi":"10.5334/snr.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite accumulating evidence of the importance of social capital in predicting health outcomes, no work has yet systematically investigated the structural differences between the social networks of god-believers and atheists. This is an especially important gap in the religion/secularism research because religiosity appears to be declining throughout the Western world (Zuckerman, Galen & Pasquale, 2016). Despite stereotypes of atheists as atomized, psychologically unhealthy and anti-social (e.g., Bainbridge, 2005), a growing body of evidence suggests that strongly-identified atheists are more likely to join secular social clubs as well as benefit from better mental and physical health compared to less affirmatively-identified secular individuals. As a step toward developing this line of research, the present article operationalizes social network structure within the study of secularism, discusses the available research with a focus on atheism in particular, and integrates this research into a schematic theoretical model of atheist self-identity, network structure and health.","PeriodicalId":42349,"journal":{"name":"Secularism & Nonreligion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Secularism & Nonreligion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Despite accumulating evidence of the importance of social capital in predicting health outcomes, no work has yet systematically investigated the structural differences between the social networks of god-believers and atheists. This is an especially important gap in the religion/secularism research because religiosity appears to be declining throughout the Western world (Zuckerman, Galen & Pasquale, 2016). Despite stereotypes of atheists as atomized, psychologically unhealthy and anti-social (e.g., Bainbridge, 2005), a growing body of evidence suggests that strongly-identified atheists are more likely to join secular social clubs as well as benefit from better mental and physical health compared to less affirmatively-identified secular individuals. As a step toward developing this line of research, the present article operationalizes social network structure within the study of secularism, discusses the available research with a focus on atheism in particular, and integrates this research into a schematic theoretical model of atheist self-identity, network structure and health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无神论、社会网络与健康:回顾与理论模型
尽管越来越多的证据表明社会资本在预测健康结果方面的重要性,但还没有任何工作系统地调查信仰上帝的人和无神论者的社会网络之间的结构差异。这是宗教/世俗主义研究中一个特别重要的差距,因为宗教信仰在整个西方世界似乎都在下降(Zuckerman,Galen&Pasquale,2016)。尽管人们对无神论者的刻板印象是原子化的、心理不健康的和反社会的(例如,Bainbridge,2005),但越来越多的证据表明,与身份不那么确定的世俗个人相比,身份坚定的无神论者更有可能加入世俗社交俱乐部,并从更好的身心健康中受益。作为发展这一研究路线的一步,本文在世俗主义研究中操作社会网络结构,特别是以无神论为重点讨论现有的研究,并将这一研究纳入无神论者自我认同、网络结构和健康的示意性理论模型中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
3
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Dreaming On: Dying Behaviour and the Romantic-Individualist Ethos The Social Imaginary of Science and Nonreligion: Narrating the Connection in the Anglophone West Seeing is Believing: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of the Experiences of the ‘Spiritual But Not Religious’ in Britain Advancing the Study of Nonreligion through Feminist Methods Is Secularism Too Western? Disputes Around Offending Pictures of Muhammad and the Virgin Mary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1