Traditional agroforestry on forested land: a comprehensive analysis of its distribution pattern in the 19th century

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Agroforestry Systems Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1007/s10457-023-00894-4
Péter Szabó, Écio Souza Diniz, Jakub Houška
{"title":"Traditional agroforestry on forested land: a comprehensive analysis of its distribution pattern in the 19th century","authors":"Péter Szabó,&nbsp;Écio Souza Diniz,&nbsp;Jakub Houška","doi":"10.1007/s10457-023-00894-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Traditional agroforestry on agricultural land was common in the past in Central Europe. However, much less is known about agroforestry on forested land, especially because it was often banned by forestry authorities during the 20th century. We used data from the so-called stable cadastre to map the occurrence of agroforestry uses (litter raking, hay cutting and forest grazing) on forested land in the mid-19th century in Moravia (eastern part of the Czech Republic, ca. 27,000 km<sup>2</sup>) in high spatial resolution. We combined machine learning algorithms and logistic models to reveal which environmental, land use and forest management factors could be linked to the occurrence of individual agroforestry uses. Results showed that agroforestry on forested land was very common in the 19th century: only 9.2% of townships with forests had no agroforestry uses. The distribution of agroforestry uses was clearly connected to environmental factors and to the availability of agricultural products that agroforestry uses were meant to supplement (e.g. hay cutting in forests was the most common in townships with large forests and few grasslands). However, the ubiquity of some uses (especially litter raking) made it more difficult to arrive at straightforward conclusions. In addition, we discussed the limitations inherent in the stable cadastre and how these might influence the interpretation of the results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"98 1","pages":"115 - 127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-023-00894-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional agroforestry on agricultural land was common in the past in Central Europe. However, much less is known about agroforestry on forested land, especially because it was often banned by forestry authorities during the 20th century. We used data from the so-called stable cadastre to map the occurrence of agroforestry uses (litter raking, hay cutting and forest grazing) on forested land in the mid-19th century in Moravia (eastern part of the Czech Republic, ca. 27,000 km2) in high spatial resolution. We combined machine learning algorithms and logistic models to reveal which environmental, land use and forest management factors could be linked to the occurrence of individual agroforestry uses. Results showed that agroforestry on forested land was very common in the 19th century: only 9.2% of townships with forests had no agroforestry uses. The distribution of agroforestry uses was clearly connected to environmental factors and to the availability of agricultural products that agroforestry uses were meant to supplement (e.g. hay cutting in forests was the most common in townships with large forests and few grasslands). However, the ubiquity of some uses (especially litter raking) made it more difficult to arrive at straightforward conclusions. In addition, we discussed the limitations inherent in the stable cadastre and how these might influence the interpretation of the results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统林地农林业:19世纪林地农林业分布格局综合分析
在过去的中欧,农田上的传统农林业很常见。然而,人们对林地上的农林业却知之甚少,特别是因为在 20 世纪,林地上的农林业经常被林业当局禁止。我们利用所谓的稳定地籍数据,以高空间分辨率绘制了 19 世纪中期摩拉维亚(捷克共和国东部,约 2.7 万平方公里)林地上农林业用途(耙地、割草和森林放牧)的分布图。我们将机器学习算法和逻辑模型相结合,揭示了哪些环境、土地利用和森林管理因素可能与个别农林业用途的发生有关。结果表明,在 19 世纪,林地上的农林业非常普遍:只有 9.2% 有森林的乡镇没有农林业用途。农林业用途的分布显然与环境因素和农林业用途所要补充的农产品的可获得性有关(例如,在森林面积大、草地少的乡镇,在森林中割草最为普遍)。然而,某些用途(尤其是耙垃圾)的普遍性使得得出直接结论变得更加困难。此外,我们还讨论了稳定地籍所固有的局限性,以及这些局限性会如何影响对结果的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
期刊最新文献
Current trends in silvopastoral systems Correction: Botanical composition gradients in silvopastoral systems on temperate native grasslands of Uruguay Correction: Silvopastoral transitions in Latin America: toward diverse perennial systems Designing silvopastoral systems: a simulation model approach Silvopastoral systems as a strategy to attenuate the negative effects of heat stress on productivity of beef cows grazing natural grassland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1