Quantifying the Zero-Price Effect in the Field: Evidence from Swedish Prescription Drug Choices

IF 2.1 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of the Association for Consumer Research Pub Date : 2021-12-10 DOI:10.1086/718460
Andrew T. Ching, David Granlund, David Sundström
{"title":"Quantifying the Zero-Price Effect in the Field: Evidence from Swedish Prescription Drug Choices","authors":"Andrew T. Ching, David Granlund, David Sundström","doi":"10.1086/718460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use Swedish data on consumer choices of therapeutically equivalent drugs to measure the zero-price effect. The Swedish benefit scheme for prescription drugs is a tier system, where each patient’s copay share is a step function of his/her qualified accumulated expenditure and can ultimately drop to zero. The copay tier a patient falls into is exogenously determined by his/her health and drug needs. In any given month, a patient pays the copay share of the lowest priced drug, plus the price difference between the chosen drug and the lowest priced drug in the same therapeutically equivalent exchange group. Therefore, when consumers cross the threshold of the zero-copay tier, the net price for the lowest priced drug will switch from a small positive amount to zero. This unique quasi-random environment allows us to apply the regression discontinuity design to quantify the zero-price effect. We do so for the full sample, as well as for two subsamples that should be less affected by state dependence. Based on a linear (quadratic) specification, the estimated zero-price effect reduces choice shares of the noncheapest alternatives by 12% (13%), 39% (48%), and 23% (25%) in the full sample, new diagnoses sample, and switchers sample, respectively.","PeriodicalId":36388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research","volume":"1133 1","pages":"175 - 185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/718460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

We use Swedish data on consumer choices of therapeutically equivalent drugs to measure the zero-price effect. The Swedish benefit scheme for prescription drugs is a tier system, where each patient’s copay share is a step function of his/her qualified accumulated expenditure and can ultimately drop to zero. The copay tier a patient falls into is exogenously determined by his/her health and drug needs. In any given month, a patient pays the copay share of the lowest priced drug, plus the price difference between the chosen drug and the lowest priced drug in the same therapeutically equivalent exchange group. Therefore, when consumers cross the threshold of the zero-copay tier, the net price for the lowest priced drug will switch from a small positive amount to zero. This unique quasi-random environment allows us to apply the regression discontinuity design to quantify the zero-price effect. We do so for the full sample, as well as for two subsamples that should be less affected by state dependence. Based on a linear (quadratic) specification, the estimated zero-price effect reduces choice shares of the noncheapest alternatives by 12% (13%), 39% (48%), and 23% (25%) in the full sample, new diagnoses sample, and switchers sample, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化该领域的零价格效应:来自瑞典处方药选择的证据
我们使用瑞典关于消费者选择治疗等效药物的数据来衡量零价格效应。瑞典的处方药福利计划是一种分级制度,每个患者的自付垫底费份额是他/她的合格累计支出的阶跃函数,最终可能降至零。患者的自付垫底是由他/她的健康和药物需求决定的。在任何一个月,患者支付最低价格药物的自付额份额,加上所选药物与同一治疗等效交换组中最低价格药物之间的差价。因此,当消费者跨过零自付垫底的门槛时,价格最低的药物的净价将从一个小的正数转变为零。这种独特的准随机环境使我们能够应用回归不连续性设计来量化零价格效应。我们对全样本以及受状态依赖性影响较小的两个子样本都这样做。基于线性(二次)规范,在全样本、新诊断样本和切换者样本中,估计的零价格效应分别使非堆积备选方案的选择份额减少了12%(13%)、39%(48%)和23%(25%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Priming Young Minds – The Appeal of Gambling Advertising to Children and Young People. Mathematics is Good for the Mind and Body: Children Make Better Food Choices After Solving Math Problems Understanding the Past and Preparing for Tomorrow: Children and Adolescent Consumer Behavior Insights from Research in Our Field EDUCATING FOR ADOLESCENT WELL-BEING: IS IT TIME FOR MARKETPLACE LITERACY? The Effects of Social Media Consumption on Adolescent Psychological Well-Being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1