Implicit Gender Bias, Engagement, and Protective Factors in STEM Faculty

Cheryl L. Dickter
{"title":"Implicit Gender Bias, Engagement, and Protective Factors in STEM Faculty","authors":"Cheryl L. Dickter","doi":"10.5399/OSU/ADVJRNL.1.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study assessed implicit gender bias and job engagement among STEM faculty at a mid-size liberal arts university. Forty-nine faculty in each of the departments of natural and social sciences were assessed for implicit gender bias and job engagement. We found that men had greater implicit gender bias than women in the natural sciences. In addition, women in natural science departments felt marginally less engaged than women in social science departments. Women’s disengagement was positively associated with imposter phenomenon and perceived lack of control in departmental decisions. However, women who actively participated in a women’s organization or had an advocate had more positive psychological outcomes. These findings suggest that although women STEM faculty, particularly in the natural sciences, experience challenges, support provided by women’s organizations or advocates may be an important strategy to reduce the effects of these challenges.","PeriodicalId":93512,"journal":{"name":"Advance journal (Corvallis, Ore.)","volume":"402 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advance journal (Corvallis, Ore.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5399/OSU/ADVJRNL.1.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study assessed implicit gender bias and job engagement among STEM faculty at a mid-size liberal arts university. Forty-nine faculty in each of the departments of natural and social sciences were assessed for implicit gender bias and job engagement. We found that men had greater implicit gender bias than women in the natural sciences. In addition, women in natural science departments felt marginally less engaged than women in social science departments. Women’s disengagement was positively associated with imposter phenomenon and perceived lack of control in departmental decisions. However, women who actively participated in a women’s organization or had an advocate had more positive psychological outcomes. These findings suggest that although women STEM faculty, particularly in the natural sciences, experience challenges, support provided by women’s organizations or advocates may be an important strategy to reduce the effects of these challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
STEM教师的内隐性别偏见、参与和保护因素
本研究评估了一所中等规模文科大学STEM教师的隐性性别偏见和工作参与度。对自然科学系和社会科学系的49名教师进行了隐性性别偏见和工作参与度评估。我们发现,在自然科学领域,男性比女性有更大的隐性性别偏见。此外,自然科学系的女性参与感略低于社会科学系的妇女。妇女的脱离与冒名顶替现象和部门决策缺乏控制呈正相关。然而,积极参与妇女组织或有倡导者的妇女有更积极的心理结果。这些发现表明,尽管女性STEM教师,特别是自然科学教师,经历了挑战,但女性组织或倡导者提供的支持可能是减少这些挑战影响的重要策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Just Hit Me Already: Obscured Workplace Abuse and Discrimination Institutional Betrayal Poetry When Enough Became Too Much: Institutional Betrayal, Resignation, & Institutional Courage for Change The Men Not in the Room A Systematic Review of Cultural Betrayal Trauma Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1